Suppr超能文献

通过张力肌电图评估的肘屈肌收缩速度:公式之间的比较

Contraction Velocity of the Elbow Flexors Assessed by Tensiomyography: A Comparison Between Formulas.

作者信息

Mesquita Ricardo N O, Latella Christopher, Ruas Cassio V, Nosaka Kazunori, Taylor Janet L

机构信息

Department of Electrical Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.

School of Medical and Health Sciences, Centre for Human Performance, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2023 Oct 1;37(10):1969-1977. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000004495. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

Abstract

Mesquita, RNO, Latella, C, Ruas, CV, Nosaka, K, and Taylor, JL. Contraction velocity of the elbow flexors assessed by tensiomyography: A comparison between formulas. J Strength Cond Res 37(10): 1969-1977, 2023-Muscle contraction velocity ( Vc ) assessed by tensiomyography is a promising measure for athlete profiling. Multiple formulas are used to estimate Vc , but the most suitable method is yet to be established. Fifteen adults (2 female subjects) underwent tensiomyography assessment of biceps brachii muscle at 10, 45 and 90° of elbow flexion on 2 separate days. Vc was calculated using 6 formulas. Formulas 1 and 2 are measures of the early phase of the twitch; Formulas 3-5 are measures over a wider time-window, with Formula 5 normalizing Vc to maximal displacement ( D m); and we proposed Formula 6 as a measure of peak Vc . Test-retest reliability, the required minimum number of trials, proportional bias, and effects of joint angle were investigated. Higher reliability (coefficient of variation: 2.8-6.9%) was found for Formula 1 (0-2 mm of displacement) and Formula 5 (normalized 10-90% of D m). Overall, a minimum of 6-7 trials was required to obtain reliable estimates. For 10° only, significant positive proportional bias ( r = 0.563-0.670) was found for all formulas except Formula 5. Vc was faster ( p < 0.001) at shorter muscle lengths for all formulas except Formula 5 ( p = 0.06). Vc in the early phase of the twitch was more reliable when calculated using absolute displacement (Formula 1) than a relative threshold (Formula 2). Over a larger time-window, Formulas 3 and 4 were similarly reliable. Because they are derived from different components of the twitch and different parameters, the different formulas should not be used interchangeably. Additionally, more precise nomenclature is required to describe the information obtained from each formula.

摘要

梅斯基塔,RNO,拉泰拉,C,鲁阿斯,CV,野坂,K,以及泰勒,JL。通过张力肌电图评估肘屈肌的收缩速度:公式之间的比较。《力量与体能研究杂志》37(10): 1969 - 1977,2023年 - 通过张力肌电图评估的肌肉收缩速度(Vc)是运动员特征分析的一项有前景的指标。多种公式用于估算Vc,但最合适的方法尚未确立。15名成年人(2名女性受试者)在两个不同日期,于肘屈曲10°、45°和90°时接受了肱二头肌的张力肌电图评估。使用6种公式计算Vc。公式1和2是对抽搐早期阶段的测量;公式3 - 5是在更宽时间窗口内的测量,公式5将Vc归一化至最大位移(Dm);并且我们提出公式6作为峰值Vc的测量方法。研究了重测信度、所需的最少试验次数、比例偏差以及关节角度的影响。发现公式1(位移0 - 2毫米)和公式5(归一化Dm的10 - 90%)具有更高的信度(变异系数:2.8 - 6.9%)。总体而言,需要至少6 - 7次试验才能获得可靠的估算值。仅对于10°,除公式5外,所有公式均发现显著的正比例偏差(r = 0.563 - 0.670)。除公式5(p = 0.06)外,所有公式在较短肌肉长度时Vc更快(p < 0.001)。当使用绝对位移(公式1)而非相对阈值(公式2)计算时,抽搐早期阶段的Vc更可靠。在更大的时间窗口内,公式3和4同样可靠。由于它们源自抽搐的不同组成部分和不同参数,不同公式不应互换使用。此外,需要更精确的术语来描述从每个公式获得的信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验