Department of Sports Sciences, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Strength, Power and Technical Sports, Institute for Applied Training Science, Leipzig, Germany.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0288806. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288806. eCollection 2023.
Tensiomyography measures the radial displacement of a muscle during an electrically evoked twitch contraction. Different concepts to determine the rate of displacement (Vc) from the maximum twitch exist, but information on their reproducibility is scarce. Further, different inter-stimuli intervals during progressive stimulation are used, but the effect of different intervals on Vc is unclear.
The first aim of this study was to investigate the within and between-day reliability of the five most frequently used Vc concepts. The second aim was to investigate the effect of different inter-stimuli intervals on Vc.
On two consecutive days, we determined Vc of the biceps femoris long head and rectus femoris of twenty-four healthy subjects. The maximum displacement was determined twice within three minutes on day one and a third time 24 h later. Also, on day two, we applied three blocks of ten consecutive stimuli at a constant intensity of 50 mA, separated by 3 min each. Inter-stimuli intervals in randomly ordered blocks were 10 s, 20 s or 30 s, respectively.
All Vc concepts displayed good to excellent relative (ICC 0.87-0.99) and generally good absolute within- and between-day reliability for both muscles. Across Vc-concepts, absolute reliability was higher for the rectus femoris (CV% 1.3-7.95%) compared to the biceps femoris (CV% 6.06-15.30%). In both muscles, Vc was generally not affected by different inter-stimuli intervals. For most Vc concepts, repeated stimulation induced an increase regardless of the inter-stimuli interval, but this effect was mainly trivial and small at most.
The reproducibility of Vc concepts was generally good but varies between different muscles. A rest interval of 10 s seems preferable to longer intervals for less time required per measurement. Following this initial study, the effect of different inter-stimuli intervals on Vc should be further investigated.
张力肌描记法测量肌肉在电诱发抽搐收缩期间的径向位移。存在确定位移速度(Vc)的不同概念,但关于其可重复性的信息很少。此外,在进行递增刺激时使用了不同的刺激间间隔,但不同间隔对 Vc 的影响尚不清楚。
本研究的第一个目的是研究五种最常用的 Vc 概念的日内和日间可靠性。第二个目的是研究不同刺激间间隔对 Vc 的影响。
在连续两天内,我们确定了 24 名健康受试者的肱二头肌长头和股直肌的 Vc。在第一天的三分钟内,最大位移被确定了两次,24 小时后又确定了第三次。此外,在第二天,我们以 50 mA 的恒定强度施加三个连续十次刺激的块,每个块之间间隔 3 分钟。刺激间间隔在随机顺序的块中分别为 10 秒、20 秒或 30 秒。
所有 Vc 概念在两种肌肉中均显示出良好至极好的相对(ICC 0.87-0.99)和一般良好的日内和日间绝对可靠性。在 Vc 概念方面,股直肌的绝对可靠性(CV% 1.3-7.95%)高于肱二头肌(CV% 6.06-15.30%)。在两种肌肉中,Vc 通常不受不同刺激间间隔的影响。对于大多数 Vc 概念,无论刺激间间隔如何,重复刺激都会引起增加,但这种影响主要是轻微和小的。
Vc 概念的可重复性通常较好,但在不同肌肉之间有所差异。对于每次测量所需的时间较少,10 秒的休息间隔似乎比更长的间隔更可取。在这项初步研究之后,应该进一步研究不同刺激间间隔对 Vc 的影响。