Clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with poor prognosis after endoscopic resection of 10-20 mm rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a multicenter, retrospective study of 10-year experience.

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of endoscopic resection for of 10-20 mm rectal neuroendocrine tumor (NET) remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with poor prognosis after endoscopic resection of 10-20 mm rectal NET and to determine the optimal treatment.

METHODS

Patients who underwent endoscopic resection for rectal NET in four tertiary hospitals were enrolled, and data on with the clinical outcomes and risk factors related to poor prognosis were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal resection (ESD; n = 65, 61.9%), modified endoscopic mucosal resection (mEMR; n = 31, 29.5%), and conventional EMR (cEMR; n = 9, 8.6%) were enrolled. The mean follow-up period was 41.2 ± 21.9 months. In the morphologic findings, the mean diameter was 11.6 mm (range 10-19); the shape was sessile (50.5%) and mixed type (49.5%), and surface depression was observed in 41.9% of patients. In the histologic findings, 87.6% of patients had G1 and 12.4% G2 tumor grade, and 3.8% of patients had lymphovascular invasion. The overall en bloc and histologically complete (R0) resections were 99.1% and 76.2%, respectively. cEMR was a less-frequently developed R0 resection. In the univariate and multivariate analyses for R0 resection, only surface depression was significantly associated. Regional or distant organs metastasis during follow-up developed in three patients (2.9%) and was significantly associated with female sex, redness, G2 tumor grade, and non-ESD methods.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of 10-20 mm rectal NET had good prognosis; therefore, endoscopic resection can be considered as the first-line treatment, particularly for 10-14 mm rectal NET. However, the risk factors, such as female sex, redness, G2 tumor grade and non-ESD methods, were associated with regional or distant metastases during follow-up. Therefore, patients with these risk factors should be carefully monitored.