Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜肝切除术在老年患者中的获益。

Benefits of laparoscopic liver resection in elderly patients.

机构信息

Ageo Central General Hospital, Department of Surgery, Center for Advanced Treatment of HBP Diseases, 1-10-10 Kashiwaza, Ageo, Saitama, 362-8588, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5205-5214. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09986-9. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The indications of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) have expanded to high-risk patients, such as elderly people. However, to date, little evidence has been established of the safety and feasibility of LLR in elderly patients. The short-term outcomes of LLR in elderly patients as compared to non-elderly patients were investigated.

METHODS

Data of a total of 297 patients who underwent LLR were reviewed. Among these 297 patients, 181 patients were < 75 years age (non-elderly) and 116 patients were ≥ 75 years age (elderly), and the surgical outcomes were compared between the groups. In addition, we evaluated the risk factors for postoperative morbidity (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) utilizing the preoperative, operative, and postoperative variables RESULTS: The preoperative liver/renal function, frequency of anti-thrombotic drug use, number of comorbidities, and American Society of Anesthesiologists-physical status classification were more unfavorable in elderly patients than in non-elderly patients. No significant inter-group differences were observed in the operation time, blood loss, conversion rate, postoperative morbidity, or 30-day mortality. The 3-year overall survival rate was comparable between the two groups. Multivariate analysis identified anti-thrombotic drug use, operation time > 7 h, and peak serum total bilirubin > 2 mg/dl within postoperative day 3 as independent risk factors for Clavien-Dindo ≥ IIIa postoperative morbidity (P = 0.016, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

LLR in elderly patients may provide comparable short-term outcomes to those in non-elderly patients.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜肝切除术(LLR)的适应证已扩展到高危患者,如老年人。然而,迄今为止,关于 LLR 在老年患者中的安全性和可行性的证据很少。本研究旨在比较老年患者与非老年患者行 LLR 的短期结果。

方法

回顾性分析了 297 例行 LLR 患者的资料。其中 181 例患者年龄<75 岁(非老年),116 例患者年龄≥75 岁(老年),比较两组患者的手术结果。此外,利用术前、术中、术后变量评估术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo 分级≥IIIa)的危险因素。

结果

老年患者的术前肝肾功能、抗血栓药物使用频率、合并症数量和美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级均较非老年患者差。两组患者的手术时间、出血量、中转率、术后并发症发生率和 30 天死亡率无显著差异。两组患者的 3 年总生存率相当。多因素分析发现,抗血栓药物使用、手术时间>7 h 和术后第 3 天血清总胆红素峰值>2 mg/dl 是 Clavien-Dindo≥IIIa 级术后并发症的独立危险因素(P=0.016、P<0.001 和 P=0.001)。

结论

在老年患者中行 LLR 可能与非老年患者具有相似的短期结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验