Suppr超能文献

通过比较预估切除体积和实际切除体积评估使用Glissonian入路联合吲哚菁绿荧光阴性染色的腹腔镜肝单段切除术的准确性:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。

Evaluation of accuracy of laparoscopic liver mono-segmentectomy using the Glissonian approach with indocyanine green fluorescence negative staining by comparing estimated and actual resection volumes: A single-center retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Funamizu Naotake, Ozaki Takahiro, Mishima Kohei, Igarashi Kazuharu, Omura Kenji, Takada Yasutsugu, Wakabayashi Go

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo-city, Saitama prefecture, Japan.

Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Ehime University, Toon-city, Ehime prefecture, Japan.

出版信息

J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021 Dec;28(12):1060-1068. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.924. Epub 2021 Mar 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Laparoscopic liver mono-segmentectomy (LLMS) may improve patient outcomes, but it is difficult and its accuracy and safety are unknown. We evaluated the accuracy of LLMS using Glissonian approach with indocyanine green fluorescence (ICG) negative staining.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients eligible for LLMS except for segment 1 were enrolled. Preoperative three-dimensional CT-based surgical simulation was used to determine estimated liver resection volume (ELRV), which was compared with modified actual liver resection volume (ALRV) obtained from actual liver resection mass. The LLMS accuracy was also evaluated based on operator's experience (attending surgeon [AS] or trainee surgeon [TS]).

RESULTS

Estimated liver resection volumes significantly correlated with ALRVs (r = .82) in all cases. Moreover, TS-conducted LLMS also showed acceptable difference between ELRV and ALRV compared with AS-conducted LLMS. There were no intergroup differences in estimated blood loss, operation time, time of Pringle maneuver, postoperative complications, and length of postoperative hospitalization (P < .05). Moreover, R0 resection was comparable between the AS and TS groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic liver mono-segmentectomy with Glissonian approach using ICG negative imaging ensured safe and accurate procedure owing to facilitated visualization of the resection line. Our approach was effective in avoiding postoperative liver dysfunction and securing radical resection. In addition, it might be helpful in TS education of LLMS.

摘要

背景/目的:腹腔镜肝单段切除术(LLMS)可能改善患者预后,但该手术难度较大,其准确性和安全性尚不清楚。我们使用吲哚菁绿荧光(ICG)阴性染色的Glissonian入路评估了LLMS的准确性。

方法

纳入74例除第1段外适合行LLMS的患者。术前基于三维CT的手术模拟用于确定估计肝切除体积(ELRV),并与从实际肝切除标本获得的改良实际肝切除体积(ALRV)进行比较。还根据术者经验(主刀医生[AS]或实习医生[TS])评估LLMS的准确性。

结果

所有病例中,估计肝切除体积与ALRV显著相关(r = 0.82)。此外,与AS实施的LLMS相比,TS实施的LLMS在ELRV和ALRV之间也显示出可接受的差异。估计失血量、手术时间、肝门阻断时间、术后并发症及术后住院时间在组间无差异(P < 0.05)。此外,AS组和TS组的R0切除率相当。

结论

使用ICG阴性成像的Glissonian入路进行腹腔镜肝单段切除术,由于便于观察切除线,确保了手术的安全和准确。我们的方法有效地避免了术后肝功能障碍并确保了根治性切除。此外,它可能有助于LLMS的实习医生培训。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验