University of Bath, United Kingdom.
University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Nov;62(11):1217-1232. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2023.02.013. Epub 2023 Mar 20.
Trauma exposure in childhood is common and can lead to a range of negative mental health outcomes, including posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). In many settings, resources to address this distress are scarce. Group-based interventions require minimal resources and training, can be delivered by non-mental health specialists, and target larger numbers of children and adolescents. This meta-analysis sought to establish whether such an approach is an effective method for targeting PTSD symptoms and to identify potential moderators of effectiveness.
PubMed, PsycNET, and PTSDPubs were searched for randomized controlled trials that used a group-based PTSD intervention with children and adolescents aged 6 to 18 years. Data were extracted for PTSD symptoms and depression symptoms. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to obtain between-group pooled effect size estimates. This study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020187214).
The initial search identified 9,650 studies, of which 42 were eligible for inclusion (N = 5,998). Children randomized to a group-based intervention had significantly lower PTSD symptoms after treatment compared with a control group, with a medium pooled effect (g = -0.55, 95% CI [-0.76, -0.35]). Group interventions were superior when compared with either active or passive controls, at follow-up, and for depression symptoms. There was a large amount of heterogeneity, but no evidence that this was explained by whether the intervention was delivered in a low- and middle-income or high-income country, included caregivers, or was universal or targeted.
Group PTSD interventions, particularly cognitive-behavioral therapy-based interventions, are effective at targeting posttrauma distress in children and adolescents. There was evidence of effectiveness when delivered in highly complex and resource-scarce settings and to a range of trauma-exposed groups, including groups exposed to war/conflict, natural disasters, and abuse.
儿童时期的创伤暴露很常见,可能导致一系列负面的心理健康后果,包括创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。在许多环境中,解决这种痛苦的资源稀缺。基于群体的干预措施所需资源和培训最少,可以由非心理健康专家提供,并针对更多的儿童和青少年。这项荟萃分析旨在确定这种方法是否是针对 PTSD 症状的有效方法,并确定有效性的潜在调节因素。
在 PubMed、PsycNET 和 PTSDPubs 中搜索了针对 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年的基于群体的 PTSD 干预的随机对照试验。提取 PTSD 症状和抑郁症状的数据。进行了随机效应荟萃分析,以获得组间汇总的效应大小估计值。这项研究已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020187214)上注册。
最初的搜索确定了 9650 项研究,其中 42 项符合纳入标准(N=5998)。与对照组相比,随机分配到基于群体的干预组的儿童在治疗后 PTSD 症状明显降低,具有中等的汇总效应(g=-0.55,95%CI[-0.76,-0.35])。与主动或被动对照组相比,在随访时,以及针对抑郁症状,群体干预都更有效。存在大量的异质性,但没有证据表明这是由于干预是在中低收入还是高收入国家进行的,是否包括照顾者,或者是普遍的还是有针对性的干预。
群体 PTSD 干预措施,特别是基于认知行为疗法的干预措施,对儿童和青少年的创伤后痛苦具有疗效。在高度复杂和资源匮乏的环境中,以及对一系列创伤暴露群体(包括暴露于战争/冲突、自然灾害和虐待的群体)中进行干预时,都有证据表明干预有效。