Suppr超能文献

枕大神经阻滞治疗丛集性头痛的有效性和安全性概况:一项系统评价

Effectiveness and safety profile of greater occipital nerve blockade in cluster headache: a systematic review.

作者信息

Gordon Alexander, Roe Thomas, Villar-Martínez María Dolores, Moreno-Ajona David, Goadsby Peter J, Hoffmann Jan

机构信息

Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, UK.

出版信息

J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 14;95(1):73-85. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2023-331066.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Greater occipital nerve (GON) blockade is a short-term preventive therapy for cluster headache (CH). We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of GON blockade in patients with CH.

METHODS

On 23 October 2020, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic, PsycINFO, CINAHL, CENTRAL and Web of Science databases from their inception date. Studies included participants with a CH diagnosis who received corticosteroid and local anaesthetic suboccipital region injections. Outcomes were change in the frequency/severity/duration of attacks; proportion of participants responding to treatment, time to attack freedom from an attack, change in attack bout length and/or the presence of adverse effects after GON blockade. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias V.2.0 (RoB2)/Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS- I) tools and a specific tool for case reports/series.

RESULTS

Two RCTs, eight prospective and eight retrospective studies, and four case reports were included in the narrative synthesis. Every effectiveness study found a significant response in one or more of frequency/severity/duration of individual attacks or proportion of patients responding to treatment (47.8%-100.0%). There were five instances of potentially irreversible adverse effects. A higher injectate volume and use of concurrent prophylaxis may be associated with an increased likelihood of response. Methylprednisolone may have the best safety profile of available corticosteroids.

DISCUSSION

GON blockade is safe and effective for CH prevention. Higher injectate volumes may improve likelihood of response, and the likelihood of serious adverse events may be reduced by using methylprednisolone.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020208435.

摘要

背景

枕大神经(GON)阻滞是丛集性头痛(CH)的一种短期预防性治疗方法。我们进行了一项系统评价,以评估GON阻滞在CH患者中的有效性和安全性。

方法

2020年10月23日,我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Embase Classic、PsycINFO、CINAHL、CENTRAL和Web of Science数据库自创建以来的数据。研究纳入了被诊断为CH且接受皮质类固醇和局部麻醉剂枕下区域注射的参与者。结局指标包括发作频率/严重程度/持续时间的变化;对治疗有反应的参与者比例、无发作的时间、发作周期长度的变化和/或GON阻滞后不良反应的发生情况。使用Cochrane偏倚风险V.2.0(RoB2)/非随机干预研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS-I)工具以及针对病例报告/系列的特定工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

叙述性综合分析纳入了两项随机对照试验、八项前瞻性和八项回顾性研究以及四项病例报告。每项有效性研究均发现,在个体发作的频率/严重程度/持续时间或对治疗有反应的患者比例中的一项或多项上有显著反应(47.8%-100.0%)。有五例可能不可逆转的不良反应。较高的注射量和同时使用预防性药物可能与反应可能性增加有关。甲基强的松龙可能是现有皮质类固醇中安全性最佳的。

讨论

GON阻滞对预防CH安全有效。较高的注射量可能会提高反应可能性,使用甲基强的松龙可能会降低严重不良事件的可能性。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42020208435。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验