Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education for Intelligent Control System and Intelligent Equipment, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China.
Engineering Research Center of the Ministry of Education for Intelligent Control System and Intelligent Equipment, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao, China.
ISA Trans. 2023 Jul;138:504-520. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2023.03.015. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
The superior performance of evolutionary multitasking (EMT) algorithms is largely owing to the potential synergy between tasks. Current EMT algorithms only involve a unidirectional process of transferring individuals from the source task to the target task. This method does not consider the search preference of the target task in the process of finding transferred individuals; therefore, the potential synergy between tasks is not fully utilized. Herein, we propose a bidirectional knowledge transfer method, which refers to the search preference of the target task in the process of finding transferred individuals. These transferred individuals fit the search process well for the target task. In addition, an adaptive strategy for adjusting the intensity of the knowledge transfer is proposed. This method enables the algorithm to adjust the intensity of knowledge transfer independently according to the living conditions of the individuals to be transferred to balance the convergence of the population with the computational intensity of the algorithm. The proposed algorithm is compared with comparison algorithms on 38 multi-objective multitasking optimization benchmarks. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm is not only outperforming other comparison algorithms in more than 30 benchmarks, but also has considerable convergence efficiency.
进化多任务处理 (EMT) 算法的卓越性能在很大程度上归因于任务之间的潜在协同作用。当前的 EMT 算法仅涉及将个体从源任务单向转移到目标任务的过程。这种方法在寻找转移个体的过程中没有考虑目标任务的搜索偏好;因此,任务之间的潜在协同作用没有得到充分利用。在这里,我们提出了一种双向知识转移方法,该方法涉及在寻找转移个体的过程中目标任务的搜索偏好。这些转移个体非常适合目标任务的搜索过程。此外,还提出了一种用于调整知识转移强度的自适应策略。该方法使算法能够根据要转移的个体的生存条件独立调整知识转移的强度,以平衡种群的收敛性和算法的计算强度。将所提出的算法与 38 个多目标多任务优化基准进行了比较。实验结果表明,所提出的算法不仅在 30 多个基准测试中优于其他比较算法,而且具有相当高的收敛效率。