Suppr超能文献

心血管介入在减少肝切除术中出血的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Application of cardiovascular interventions to decrease blood loss during hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, ZhongDa Hospital, Southeast University, No. 87 Dingjiaqiao, Gulou District, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, 210009, China.

Department of Immunology, Ophthalmology and ENT, School of Medicine, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Mar 22;23(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02042-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Perioperative bleeding and allogeneic blood transfusion are generally thought to affect the outcomes of patients. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the benefits and risks of several cardiovascular interventions in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, and Web of Science to February 02, 2023. RCTs focused on cardiovascular interventions aimed at reducing blood loss or blood transfusion requirements during hepatectomy were included. The primary outcomes were perioperative blood loss amount, number of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusion and overall occurrence of postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes were operating time, perioperative mortality rate, postoperative liver and kidney function and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

Seventeen RCTs were included in the analysis. A total of 841 patients who underwent hepatectomy in 10 trials were included in the comparative analysis between low central venous pressure (CVP) and control groups. The forest plots showed a low operative bleeding volume [(mean difference (MD): -409.75 mL, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -616.56 to -202.94, P < 0.001], reduced blood transfusion rate [risk ratio (RR): 0.47, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.65, P < 0.001], shortened operating time (MD: -13.42 min, 95% CI -22.59 to -4.26, P = 0.004), and fewer postoperative complications (RR: 0.76, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.99, P = 0.04) in the low CVP group than in the control group. Five and two trials compared the following interventions, respectively: 'acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) vs control' and 'autologous blood donation vs control'. ANH and autologous blood donation could not reduce the blood loss amount but greatly decreased the number of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusion. No benefits were found in the rate of mortality and length of postoperative hospital stay in any of the comparisons.

CONCLUSION

Lowering the CVP seems to be effective and safe in adult patients undergoing hepatectomy. ANH and autologous blood donation should be used as a part of blood management for suitable patients in certain circumstances.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42022314061.

摘要

背景

围手术期出血和异体输血通常被认为会影响患者的预后。本荟萃分析旨在确定几种心血管介入在肝切除术中的获益和风险。

方法

在本系统评价和荟萃分析中,于 2023 年 2 月 2 日检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、Medline、Embase 和 Web of Science 中的随机对照试验 (RCT)。纳入的 RCT 专注于旨在减少肝切除术中失血或输血需求的心血管介入。主要结局是围手术期失血量、需要异体输血的患者数量以及术后并发症的总体发生情况。次要结局是手术时间、围手术期死亡率、术后肝肾功能和住院时间。

结果

纳入了 17 项 RCT 进行分析。共有 10 项试验中 841 例接受肝切除术的患者纳入了低中心静脉压 (CVP) 与对照组之间的比较分析。森林图显示,低 CVP 组的手术出血量较低[平均差值 (MD):-409.75 mL,95%置信区间 (CI):-616.56 至 -202.94,P<0.001],输血率降低[风险比 (RR):0.47,95%CI:0.34 至 0.65,P<0.001],手术时间缩短 (MD:-13.42 min,95%CI:-22.59 至 -4.26,P=0.004),术后并发症减少(RR:0.76,95%CI:0.58 至 0.99,P=0.04)。五和两项试验分别比较了“急性等容血液稀释 (ANH) 与对照”和“自体输血与对照”的干预措施。ANH 和自体输血不能减少出血量,但大大减少了需要异体输血的患者数量。在任何比较中,死亡率和术后住院时间的长短均未发现获益。

结论

在接受肝切除术的成年患者中,降低 CVP 似乎是有效且安全的。在某些情况下,ANH 和自体输血应作为血液管理的一部分,适用于某些患者。

试验注册

PROSPERO,CRD42022314061。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1cba/10032024/f567608d8d47/12871_2023_2042_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验