Zhu Huan, Gao Bo, Peng Jia-Yi, Li Xing-Yue
Department of Health Behavior and Social Medicine, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Mar;54(2):386-392. doi: 10.12182/20230360501.
To explore the impact of socioeconomic status and productive aging on the frailty index of urban elderly population in China, and to provide reference for improving their health level.
We obtained data from the 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) and included 1890 urban elderly people aged 60 and over in the study. Multiple linear regression model was used to analyze the influencing factors of the productive aging and the frailty index of the urban elderly population in China. A structural equation model was constructed to explore the relationship between socioeconomic status, productive aging, and frailty index.
Elderly people with high socioeconomic status ( =0.082, <0.001) had higher level of productive aging. Elderly people with high socioeconomic status ( =-0.091, <0.001) and high level of productive aging ( =-0.330, <0.001) had lower frailty index. Productive aging played an intermediary role ( =-0.259, 95% : -0.380--0.181) between socioeconomic status and frailty index.
The socioeconomic status and productive aging of the elderly people are important predictors of their frailty index. The government should exert its leadership functions to encourage the elderly, especially those with low education and income levels, to actively learn knowledge and skills, and to provide support for the elderly to participate in productive activities.
探讨社会经济地位和积极老龄化对中国城市老年人口衰弱指数的影响,为提高其健康水平提供参考。
我们从2018年中国健康与养老追踪调查(CLHLS)中获取数据,研究纳入1890名60岁及以上的城市老年人。采用多重线性回归模型分析中国城市老年人口积极老龄化和衰弱指数的影响因素。构建结构方程模型以探讨社会经济地位、积极老龄化和衰弱指数之间的关系。
社会经济地位高的老年人(β = 0.082,P < 0.001)积极老龄化水平较高。社会经济地位高的老年人(β =-0.091,P < 0.001)和积极老龄化水平高的老年人(β =-0.330,P < 0.001)衰弱指数较低。积极老龄化在社会经济地位和衰弱指数之间起中介作用(β =-0.259,95%CI:-0.380--0.181)。
老年人的社会经济地位和积极老龄化是其衰弱指数的重要预测因素。政府应发挥领导作用,鼓励老年人,尤其是低教育和低收入水平的老年人积极学习知识和技能,并为老年人参与生产活动提供支持。