• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年患者股骨远端骨折治疗中双钢板固定与股骨远端置换的比较

Double Plating Fixation vs Distal Femoral Replacement in the Management of Distal Femoral Fractures in Geriatric Patients.

作者信息

Gendya Amr Gamaleldin Mahmoud Khalil, El-Zaher El-Zaher Hassan, Zakaria Zeiad Mohamed, Awad Mohamed El Sayed, Metwaly Radwan Gamal Eldeen Abdelhamid

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic surgery, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Arthroplast Today. 2023 Mar 14;20:101113. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101113. eCollection 2023 Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.artd.2023.101113
PMID:36949829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10025122/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Distal femur fractures are considered challenging to manage, particularly in geriatric patients. Double plating (DP) is a technique that helps with earlier rehabilitation and return to preinjury level of activity. Distal femoral replacement (DFR) is an alternative technique in the management of these fractures that may help to solve problems like associated knee osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, and severely comminuted condyles. The current study compares the functional and radiological outcomes of DFR and DP in the management of these fractures among geriatric patients.

METHODS

This randomized, comparative, interventional study was performed at a university hospital. A total of 30 patients who underwent DFR or DP after distal femur fractures (AO/OTA 33 A3, 33 C) were analyzed. The primary outcome was Knee Society Score (KSS), whereas secondary outcomes included postoperative complications rate, knee range of motion, reoperation rate, and operative time.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed between DFR and DP except for the knee component of the KSS at a 12-month interval ( = .03) and knee range of motion at a 12-month interval ( = .001), both of which were in favor of DP. No significant difference in postoperative complications ( = .06), reoperation rate ( = 1.00), or operative time ( = .06) was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

DFR and DP had comparable functional (KSS) and radiological outcomes with no significant difference in postoperative complications, reoperation rate, or operative time.

摘要

背景

股骨远端骨折的治疗颇具挑战性,尤其是在老年患者中。双钢板固定(DP)是一种有助于早期康复并恢复至伤前活动水平的技术。股骨远端置换(DFR)是治疗这些骨折的另一种技术,可能有助于解决诸如相关膝关节骨关节炎、骨质疏松症和严重粉碎性髁部等问题。本研究比较了老年患者股骨远端骨折治疗中DFR和DP的功能及影像学结果。

方法

本随机、对照、干预性研究在一家大学医院进行。共分析了30例股骨远端骨折(AO/OTA 33 A3、33 C)后接受DFR或DP治疗的患者。主要结局指标为膝关节协会评分(KSS),次要结局指标包括术后并发症发生率、膝关节活动范围、再次手术率和手术时间。

结果

除12个月时KSS的膝关节部分(P = 0.03)和12个月时膝关节活动范围(P = 0.001)外,DFR和DP之间未观察到显著差异,这两项均有利于DP。术后并发症(P = 0.06)、再次手术率(P = 1.00)或手术时间(P = 0.06)方面未发现显著差异。

结论

DFR和DP具有可比的功能(KSS)和影像学结果,术后并发症、再次手术率或手术时间无显著差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/afcef2b00faa/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/83e4bef8c8b3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/c5dad2bf762c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/3fa0b8b44782/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/64f22a40008c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/3e48f00ef2b5/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/c8daeb25a849/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/a7c93ea0fca6/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/afcef2b00faa/gr8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/83e4bef8c8b3/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/c5dad2bf762c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/3fa0b8b44782/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/64f22a40008c/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/3e48f00ef2b5/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/c8daeb25a849/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/a7c93ea0fca6/gr7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a903/10025122/afcef2b00faa/gr8.jpg

相似文献

1
Double Plating Fixation vs Distal Femoral Replacement in the Management of Distal Femoral Fractures in Geriatric Patients.老年患者股骨远端骨折治疗中双钢板固定与股骨远端置换的比较
Arthroplast Today. 2023 Mar 14;20:101113. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2023.101113. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
Distal femoral replacement versus ORIF for severely comminuted distal femur fractures.股骨远端置换与切开复位内固定治疗严重粉碎性股骨远端骨折。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2022 Jul;32(5):959-964. doi: 10.1007/s00590-021-03061-6. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
3
Open Reduction vs Distal Femoral Replacement Arthroplasty for Comminuted Distal Femur Fractures in the Patients 70 Years and Older.70岁及以上患者股骨远端粉碎性骨折的切开复位与股骨远端置换关节成形术对比
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):202-206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
4
Distal Femur Replacement Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.远端股骨假体置换与切开复位内固定治疗股骨假体周围远端骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Trauma. 2022 Jan 1;36(1):1-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002141.
5
Periprosthetic Fractures of the Distal Femur: Is Open Reduction and Internal Fixation or Distal Femoral Replacement Superior?股骨远端假体周围骨折:切开复位内固定与股骨远端置换术哪个更优?
J Arthroplasty. 2020 May;35(5):1402-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.12.033. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
6
Equivalent mortality and complication rates following periprosthetic distal femur fractures managed with either lateral locked plating or a distal femoral replacement.采用外侧锁定钢板或股骨远端置换治疗假体周围股骨远端骨折后的等效死亡率和并发症发生率。
Injury. 2018 Feb;49(2):392-397. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.11.040. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
7
Comparison of locking compression plate and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures: a retrospective study.锁定加压钢板与股骨远端假体置换治疗股骨假体周围远端骨折的比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Int Med Res. 2022 Oct;50(10):3000605221133012. doi: 10.1177/03000605221133012.
8
Revision knee arthroplasty using a distal femoral replacement prosthesis for periprosthetic fractures in elderly patients.使用股骨远端置换假体治疗老年患者人工关节周围骨折的膝关节翻修术。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2018 Jan;28(1):95-102. doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-2009-6. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
9
Distal Femur Replacement Versus Surgical Fixation for the Treatment of Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review.老年股骨远端骨折治疗中股骨远端置换术与手术固定的系统评价
J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jan 1;35(1):2-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001867.
10
Long-Term Results of Total Knee Arthroplasty with Contemporary Distal Femoral Replacement.当代股骨远端置换全膝关节置换的长期结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020 Jan 2;102(1):45-51. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00489.

引用本文的文献

1
Is it time to Reassess The Role of Preoperative HypoalbuminemiaAmong Geriatric Distal Femur Fracture Patients?是时候重新评估术前低白蛋白血症在老年股骨远端骨折患者中的作用了吗?
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Dec 18;145(1):66. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05725-4.
2
Double plating is a suitable option for periprosthetic distal femur fracture compared to single plate fixation and distal femoral arthroplasty.与单钢板固定和股骨远端关节成形术相比,双钢板固定是治疗人工关节周围股骨远端骨折的一种合适选择。
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Jun 12;5(6):489-498. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.56.BJO-2023-0145.R1.

本文引用的文献

1
Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures After TKA: Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry Review.全膝关节置换术后假体周围骨折的股骨远端置换:澳大利亚矫形协会全国关节置换登记研究回顾。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jul;37(7):1354-1358. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.02.115. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
Distal Femur Replacement Versus Surgical Fixation for the Treatment of Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures: A Systematic Review.老年股骨远端骨折治疗中股骨远端置换术与手术固定的系统评价
J Orthop Trauma. 2021 Jan 1;35(1):2-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001867.
3
Knee Fix or Replace Trial (KFORT): a randomized controlled feasibility study.
膝关节固定或置换试验(KFORT):一项随机对照可行性研究。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Nov;101-B(11):1408-1415. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B11.BJJ-2019-0370.R2.
4
Comparison of outcomes and analysis of risk factors for non-union in locked plating of closed periprosthetic and non-periprosthetic distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort study.回顾性队列研究中锁定钢板治疗闭合性假体周围和非假体周围股骨远端骨折不愈合的结果比较及危险因素分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 24;14(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1204-z.
5
Geriatric distal femoral fractures: A retrospective study of 30 day mortality.老年股骨远端骨折:30天死亡率的回顾性研究
Injury. 2019 Feb;50(2):444-447. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.10.035. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
6
Patient Mortality in Geriatric Distal Femur Fractures.老年股骨远端骨折患者的死亡率。
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Mar;32(3):111-115. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001078.
7
Open Reduction vs Distal Femoral Replacement Arthroplasty for Comminuted Distal Femur Fractures in the Patients 70 Years and Older.70岁及以上患者股骨远端粉碎性骨折的切开复位与股骨远端置换关节成形术对比
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jan;32(1):202-206. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
8
Distal Femoral Replacement for Acute Distal Femoral Fractures in Elderly Patients.老年患者急性股骨远端骨折的股骨远端置换术
J Orthop Trauma. 2016 Sep;30(9):503-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000600.
9
Clinical outcomes of distal femoral fractures in the geriatric population using locking plates with a minimally invasive approach.采用微创方法使用锁定钢板治疗老年人群股骨远端骨折的临床疗效。
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2013 Mar;4(1):16-20. doi: 10.1177/2151458513496254.
10
Risk factors for failure of locked plate fixation of distal femur fractures: an analysis of 335 cases.股骨远端骨折锁定钢板固定失败的危险因素:335例病例分析
J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Feb;28(2):83-9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829e6dd0.