• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Assessing alibi believability: the alibi story, presence of physical evidence and timing of disclosure.评估不在场证明的可信度:不在场证明的说法、实物证据的存在以及披露时间。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Feb 10;30(2):211-223. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.2006096. eCollection 2023.
2
Alibi believability: Corroborative evidence and contextual factors.不在场证明可信度:确证证据和情境因素。
Behav Sci Law. 2020 Jul;38(4):337-354. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2473. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
3
Children as alibi witnesses: the effect of age and confidence on mock-juror decision making.儿童作为不在场证明证人:年龄和自信对模拟陪审员决策的影响。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jul 1;25(6):957-971. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1482573. eCollection 2018.
4
The impact of developmental language disorder in a defendant's description on mock jurors' perceptions and judgements.发展性语言障碍对被告描述的影响对模拟陪审员的看法和判断的影响。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jan;58(1):189-205. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12779. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
5
Abuse Is Abuse: The Influence of Type of Abuse, Victim Age, and Defendant Age on Juror Decision Making.虐待就是虐待:虐待类型、受害者年龄和被告年龄对陪审员决策的影响。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jan;36(1-2):938-956. doi: 10.1177/0886260517731316. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
6
Emotions, Crime Seriousness, and Alibi Believability.情绪、犯罪严重性与不在场证明的可信度。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2017 Jul 20;25(1):19-31. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2017.1347938. eCollection 2018.
7
The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: the effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes.对青少年陪审团审判的裁决:被告年龄对审判结果的影响。
Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(1):63-82. doi: 10.1002/bsl.517.
8
Mock Jurors' Perceptions of Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Investigating the Role of Delayed Disclosure and Relationship to the Perpetrator.模拟陪审员对儿童性虐待案件的看法:调查延迟披露和与施害者关系的作用。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Dec;37(23-24):NP23374-NP23396. doi: 10.1177/08862605221078812. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
9
Saving damsels, sentencing deviants and selective chivalry decisions: juror decision-making in an ambiguous assault case.拯救少女、判决异类与选择性的骑士精神决策:一起模糊性袭击案件中的陪审员决策
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jun 3;25(5):724-736. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1474817. eCollection 2018.
10
Juror Decision Making and Euthanasia: Exploring the Role of Jury Nullification, Manner of Death, and Defendant-Decedent Relationship.陪审员决策与安乐死:探究陪审团废法、死亡方式及被告与死者关系的作用
Psychol Rep. 2023 Dec;126(6):3052-3070. doi: 10.1177/00332941221093244. Epub 2022 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Police perceptions of alibi accounts: the role of intergroup bias.警方对不在场证明陈述的认知:群体间偏见的作用。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Mar 11;32(2):266-275. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2296485. eCollection 2025.
2
The effect of alibi consistency, presence of physical evidence and timing of disclosure on mock juror perceptions.不在场证明的一致性、实物证据的存在以及披露时间对模拟陪审员认知的影响。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2023 Jul 2;31(4):659-670. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2206869. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality vs. quantity: the effect of relationship and number of corroborators on alibi assessments.质量与数量:旁证者的关系及数量对不在场证明评估的影响。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 May 7;27(6):973-988. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1754956.
2
Jury decision-making: the impact of engagement and perceived threat on verdict decisions.陪审团决策:参与度和感知威胁对裁决决定的影响。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Sep 10;27(3):346-365. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1793819. eCollection 2020.
3
Alibi believability: Corroborative evidence and contextual factors.不在场证明可信度:确证证据和情境因素。
Behav Sci Law. 2020 Jul;38(4):337-354. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2473. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
4
Memory Errors in Alibi Generation: How an Alibi Can Turn Against Us.编造不在场证明时的记忆错误:不在场证明如何反过来对我们不利。
Behav Sci Law. 2017 Jan;35(1):6-17. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2273. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
5
TurkPrime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences.TurkPrime.com:一个适用于行为科学的多功能众包数据采集平台。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Apr;49(2):433-442. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0727-z.
6
Effects of an alibi witness's relationship to the defendant on mock jurors' judgments.不在场证人与被告的关系对模拟陪审员判断的影响。
Law Hum Behav. 2011 Apr;35(2):127-42. doi: 10.1007/s10979-010-9225-5.
7
Race and information processing in criminal trials: does the defendant's race affect how the facts are evaluated?刑事审判中的种族与信息处理:被告的种族会影响事实的评估方式吗?
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2004 Aug;30(8):995-1008. doi: 10.1177/0146167204265741.
8
What makes a good alibi? A proposed taxonomy.怎样才算一个好的不在场证明?一种拟议的分类法。
Law Hum Behav. 2004 Apr;28(2):157-76. doi: 10.1023/b:lahu.0000022320.47112.d3.

评估不在场证明的可信度:不在场证明的说法、实物证据的存在以及披露时间。

Assessing alibi believability: the alibi story, presence of physical evidence and timing of disclosure.

作者信息

Allison Meredith, Hawes Ashlynn

机构信息

Psychology, Elon University, Elon, NC, USA.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Feb 10;30(2):211-223. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.2006096. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2021.2006096
PMID:36950193
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10026759/
Abstract

The content of the alibi story, corroborative physical evidence and timing of the alibi's disclosure may all affect alibi believability. CloudResearch workers ( = 276) read a mock case. The defendant's alibi story was scandalous (or neutral), included a receipt (or no mention), and was disclosed one day (or three weeks) later. Participants rated the alibi's believability, the defendant's character, and rendered a verdict. As expected, alibi believability ratings were higher when the alibi story was neutral versus scandalous ( < .01) Similarly, the defendant was viewed positively on all eight traits when the alibi story was neutral ( < .05). The defendant was seen as more trustworthy when he did not have a receipt than when he did ( < .05). Alibi timing had little impact on the dependent measures, but participants were more certain in their verdicts when the alibi was early versus late ( < .05).

摘要

不在场证明的内容、佐证性实物证据以及不在场证明披露的时间都可能影响不在场证明的可信度。CloudResearch的工作人员(n = 276)阅读了一个模拟案例。被告的不在场证明故事是丑闻性的(或中性的),包括一张收据(或未提及),并且在一天(或三周)后披露。参与者对不在场证明的可信度、被告的性格进行评分,并做出裁决。正如预期的那样,当不在场证明故事是中性的而非丑闻性的时候,不在场证明可信度评分更高(p <.01)。同样,当不在场证明故事是中性的时候,被告在所有八个特质上都被正面看待(p <.05)。当被告没有收据时,他被认为比有收据时更值得信赖(p <.05)。不在场证明的时间对相关测量指标影响不大,但当不在场证明披露早于晚时,参与者对他们的裁决更有信心(p <.05)。