Allison Meredith, Hawes Ashlynn
Psychology, Elon University, Elon, NC, USA.
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Feb 10;30(2):211-223. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.2006096. eCollection 2023.
The content of the alibi story, corroborative physical evidence and timing of the alibi's disclosure may all affect alibi believability. CloudResearch workers ( = 276) read a mock case. The defendant's alibi story was scandalous (or neutral), included a receipt (or no mention), and was disclosed one day (or three weeks) later. Participants rated the alibi's believability, the defendant's character, and rendered a verdict. As expected, alibi believability ratings were higher when the alibi story was neutral versus scandalous ( < .01) Similarly, the defendant was viewed positively on all eight traits when the alibi story was neutral ( < .05). The defendant was seen as more trustworthy when he did not have a receipt than when he did ( < .05). Alibi timing had little impact on the dependent measures, but participants were more certain in their verdicts when the alibi was early versus late ( < .05).
不在场证明的内容、佐证性实物证据以及不在场证明披露的时间都可能影响不在场证明的可信度。CloudResearch的工作人员(n = 276)阅读了一个模拟案例。被告的不在场证明故事是丑闻性的(或中性的),包括一张收据(或未提及),并且在一天(或三周)后披露。参与者对不在场证明的可信度、被告的性格进行评分,并做出裁决。正如预期的那样,当不在场证明故事是中性的而非丑闻性的时候,不在场证明可信度评分更高(p <.01)。同样,当不在场证明故事是中性的时候,被告在所有八个特质上都被正面看待(p <.05)。当被告没有收据时,他被认为比有收据时更值得信赖(p <.05)。不在场证明的时间对相关测量指标影响不大,但当不在场证明披露早于晚时,参与者对他们的裁决更有信心(p <.05)。