• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

警方对不在场证明陈述的认知:群体间偏见的作用。

Police perceptions of alibi accounts: the role of intergroup bias.

作者信息

Rozmann Nir

机构信息

Department of Criminology, Western Galilee College, Acre, Israel.

出版信息

Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Mar 11;32(2):266-275. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2296485. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1080/13218719.2023.2296485
PMID:40406385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12096663/
Abstract

Research has revealed that ethnicity has a significant influence on police officers, potentially leading to discriminatory practices against suspects from different ethnic backgrounds. This study aimed to investigate the inclination to favor members of one's own social group, as proposed by social identity theory, when evaluating the credibility of alibi statements by Israeli police officers. The research involved 205 police officers who evaluated the credibility of alibi statements provided by suspects belonging to either the Israeli-Jewish or Israeli-Arab ethnic groups. The findings indicate that police officers were more inclined to believe the alibi when it was presented by a suspect from their own social group, thus supporting the presence of intergroup bias in assessments of alibi credibility. The implications of these findings, both practical and theoretical, are discussed.

摘要

研究表明,种族对警察有重大影响,这可能导致对来自不同种族背景的嫌疑人采取歧视性做法。本研究旨在调查以色列警察在评估不在场证明陈述的可信度时,是否如社会认同理论所提出的那样,倾向于偏袒自己社会群体的成员。该研究涉及205名警察,他们评估了属于以色列犹太或以色列阿拉伯种族群体的嫌疑人提供的不在场证明陈述的可信度。研究结果表明,当不在场证明由来自警察自己社会群体的嫌疑人提出时,警察更倾向于相信,从而支持了在不在场证明可信度评估中存在群体间偏见的观点。讨论了这些发现的实际和理论意义。

相似文献

1
Police perceptions of alibi accounts: the role of intergroup bias.警方对不在场证明陈述的认知:群体间偏见的作用。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Mar 11;32(2):266-275. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2296485. eCollection 2025.
2
Credibility assessments of alibi accounts: the role of cultural intergroup bias.不在场证明陈述的可信度评估:文化群体间偏见的作用。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Jul 19;29(4):535-548. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1938274. eCollection 2022.
3
Police Decision-Making in the Absence of Evidence-Based Guidelines: Assessment of Alcohol-Intoxicated Eyewitnesses.缺乏循证指南情况下的警方决策:对酒精中毒目击者的评估
Front Psychol. 2022 Feb 3;13:761956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.761956. eCollection 2022.
4
When do we believe experts? The power of the unorthodox view.何时我们应相信专家?非正统观点的力量。
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):729-48. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2030. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
5
Partners under Pressure: Examining the Consistency of True and False Alibi Statements.压力下的搭档:审视真假不在场证明陈述的一致性
Behav Sci Law. 2017 Jan;35(1):75-90. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2275. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
6
True and false alibis among prisoners and their detection by police detectives.囚犯中的真假不在场证明及其被警探识破的情况。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jun 26;25(6):902-921. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1482570. eCollection 2018.
7
Investigator Sensitivity to Alibi Witness Inconsistency after a Long Delay.长时间延迟后调查人员对不在场证明证人不一致性的敏感度。
Behav Sci Law. 2017 Jan;35(1):60-74. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2276. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
Ingroup Bias in Healthcare Contexts: Israeli-Jewish Perceptions of Arab and Jewish Doctors.医疗环境中的内群体偏见:以色列犹太群体对阿拉伯医生和犹太医生的看法
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 16;12:771028. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.771028. eCollection 2021.
9
The consequences of race for police officers' responses to criminal suspects.种族因素对警察应对犯罪嫌疑人的影响。
Psychol Sci. 2005 Mar;16(3):180-3. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00800.x.
10
Investigating investigators: how presentation order influences participant-investigators' interpretations of eyewitness identification and alibi evidence.调查员调查:呈现顺序如何影响目击证人辨认和不在场证据的参与者调查员的解释。
Law Hum Behav. 2009 Oct;33(5):368-80. doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9151-y. Epub 2008 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing alibi believability: the alibi story, presence of physical evidence and timing of disclosure.评估不在场证明的可信度:不在场证明的说法、实物证据的存在以及披露时间。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2022 Feb 10;30(2):211-223. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.2006096. eCollection 2023.
2
A Behavioral Analysis of Two Strategies to Eliminate Racial Bias in Police Use of Force.消除警察使用武力中种族偏见的两种策略的行为分析。
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Mar 12;15(4):1221-1231. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00551-1. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Credibility assessments of alibi accounts: the role of cultural intergroup bias.不在场证明陈述的可信度评估:文化群体间偏见的作用。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2021 Jul 19;29(4):535-548. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2021.1938274. eCollection 2022.
4
Quality vs. quantity: the effect of relationship and number of corroborators on alibi assessments.质量与数量:旁证者的关系及数量对不在场证明评估的影响。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 May 7;27(6):973-988. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1754956.
5
True and false alibis among prisoners and their detection by police detectives.囚犯中的真假不在场证明及其被警探识破的情况。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2018 Jun 26;25(6):902-921. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2018.1482570. eCollection 2018.
6
Arab Threat and Social Control: An Exploration of the Relationship Between Ethnic Attitudes and Punitiveness Among Israeli Jews.阿拉伯威胁与社会控制:以色列犹太人的种族态度与惩罚性之间关系的探究
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2020 Apr;64(5):498-521. doi: 10.1177/0306624X19895973. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
7
Attribution of Blame Toward Offenders: Victim and Offender Ethnicity, and Observer Ethnic and Religious Background.归因于罪犯的责任:受害者和罪犯的种族,以及观察者的种族和宗教背景。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Nov;36(21-22):10638-10659. doi: 10.1177/0886260519885914. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
8
Examining police officers' response bias in judging veracity.考察警察在判断真实性时的反应偏差。
Psicothema. 2017 Nov;29(4):490-495. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.357.
9
Experienced and novice officers' generalized communication suspicion and veracity judgments.经验丰富和新手警官的普遍沟通怀疑与真实性判断。
Law Hum Behav. 2016 Apr;40(2):169-81. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000169. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
10
Psychological Aspects of the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict: A Systematic Review.《巴以冲突的心理方面:系统综述》
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2017 Jul;18(3):322-338. doi: 10.1177/1524838015613774. Epub 2015 Oct 27.