Didara Zrinka, Reithofer Florian, Zöttl Karina, Jürets Alexander, Kiss Izabella, Witte Angela, Klein Reinhard
Department of Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences Krems, Piaristengasse 1, 3500 Krems, Austria.
Department of Microbiology, Immunobiology, and Genetics, Max Perutz Labs, University of Vienna, Dr. Bohr-Gasse 9, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2023 Mar 3;32:48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2023.02.033. eCollection 2023 Jun 13.
DNA-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems are able to cleave dsDNA in mammalian cells. Accordingly, they have been employed to target the genomes of dsDNA viruses, mostly when present in cells in a non-replicative state with low copy numbers. However, the sheer amount of viral DNA produced within a very short time by certain lytically replicating viruses potentially brings the capacities of CRISPR-Cas systems to their limits. The accessibility of viral DNA replication sites, short time of accessibility of the DNA before encapsidation, or its complexation with shielding proteins are further potential hurdles. Adenoviruses are fast-replicating dsDNA viruses for which no approved antiviral therapy currently exists. We evaluated the potency of CRISPR-Cas9 in inhibiting the replication of human adenovirus 5 by targeting its master regulator with a set of guide RNAs and observed a decrease in infectious virus particles by up to three orders of magnitude. Target DNA cleavage also negatively impacted the amount of viral DNA accumulated during the infection cycle. This outcome was mainly caused by specific deletions, inversions, and duplications occurring between target sites, which abolished most E1A functions in most cases. Additionally, we compared two strategies for multiplex gRNA expression and obtained comparable results.
靶向DNA的CRISPR-Cas系统能够切割哺乳动物细胞中的双链DNA。因此,它们已被用于靶向双链DNA病毒的基因组,主要是当病毒以低拷贝数的非复制状态存在于细胞中时。然而,某些裂解性复制病毒在极短时间内产生的大量病毒DNA可能会使CRISPR-Cas系统的能力达到极限。病毒DNA复制位点的可及性、DNA在衣壳化之前的可及时间较短,或者其与屏蔽蛋白的复合,都是进一步的潜在障碍。腺病毒是快速复制的双链DNA病毒,目前尚无获批的抗病毒疗法。我们通过一组引导RNA靶向人类腺病毒5的主调节因子,评估了CRISPR-Cas9抑制其复制的效力,并观察到感染性病毒颗粒减少了多达三个数量级。靶向DNA切割也对感染周期中积累的病毒DNA数量产生了负面影响。这一结果主要是由靶点之间发生的特定缺失、倒位和重复引起的,在大多数情况下,这些改变消除了大多数E1A功能。此外,我们比较了两种多重gRNA表达策略,并获得了类似的结果。