Suppr超能文献

方案:坎贝尔合作组织系统评价中的检索与报告:当前方法评估

PROTOCOL: Searching and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews: An assessment of current methods.

作者信息

Young Sarah, Bethel Alison, Keenan Ciara, Ghezzi-Kopel Kate, Moreton Elizabeth, Pickup David, Premji Zahra A, Rogers Morwenna, Viinholt Bjørn C A

机构信息

University Libraries Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA.

NIHR CLAHRC South West Peninsula (PenCLAHRC) University of Exeter Medical School Exeter UK.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 14;17(4):e1208. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1208. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

This is the protocol for a Campbell review. The aim of this study is to comprehensively assess the quality and nature of the search methods and reporting across Campbell systematic reviews. The search methods used in systematic reviews provide the foundation for establishing the body of literature from which conclusions are drawn and recommendations made. Searches should be comprehensive and reporting of search methods should be transparent and reproducible. Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews strive to adhere to the best methodological guidance available for this type of searching. The current work aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the quality of the search methods and reporting in Campbell Collaboration systematic reviews. Our specific objectives include the following: To examine how searches are currently conducted in Campbell systematic reviews. To identify any machine learning or automation methods used, or emerging and less commonly used approaches to web searching. To examine how search strategies, search methods and search reporting adhere to the Methodological Expectations of Campbell Collaboration Intervention Reviews (MECCIR) and PRISMA guidelines. The findings will be used to identify opportunities for advancing current practices in Campbell reviews through updated guidance, peer review processes and author training and support.

摘要

这是一项坎贝尔综述的方案。本研究的目的是全面评估坎贝尔系统综述中检索方法的质量和性质以及报告情况。系统综述中使用的检索方法为建立文献主体奠定了基础,结论和建议均基于该文献主体得出。检索应全面,检索方法的报告应透明且可重复。坎贝尔协作组织的系统综述努力遵循此类检索可用的最佳方法学指南。当前工作旨在全面评估坎贝尔协作组织系统综述中检索方法和报告的质量。我们的具体目标如下:考察坎贝尔系统综述目前是如何进行检索的。确定所使用的任何机器学习或自动化方法,或网络搜索中新兴的、较少使用的方法。考察检索策略、检索方法和检索报告如何遵循坎贝尔协作组织干预性综述的方法学期望(MECCIR)和PRISMA指南。研究结果将用于通过更新指南、同行评审流程以及作者培训与支持,找出推进坎贝尔综述当前实践的机会。

相似文献

5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

5
Transparency and Reproducibility of Meta-Analyses in Psychology: A Meta-Review.心理学中荟萃分析的透明度和可重复性:元综述
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jul;15(4):1026-1041. doi: 10.1177/1745691620906416. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
6
Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews.识别 Cochrane 综述中检索策略存在的问题。
Res Synth Methods. 2018 Sep;9(3):408-416. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1302. Epub 2018 May 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验