Brožová Viktorie, Bolstad Johannes S, Seregin Alexey P, Eidesen Pernille B
Department of Botany, Faculty of Science University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice České Budějovice Czech Republic.
Department of Arctic Biology The University Centre in Svalbard Longyearbyen Norway.
Ecol Evol. 2023 Mar 19;13(3):e9892. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9892. eCollection 2023 Mar.
For many arctic species, the spatial (re-)colonization patterns after the last Pleistocene glaciation have been described. However, the temporal aspects of their colonization are largely missing. Did one route prevail early, while another was more important later? The high Arctic archipelago Svalbard represents a good model system to address timeframe of postglacial plant colonization. Svalbard was almost fully glaciated during last glacial maximum and (re-)colonization of vascular plants began in early Holocene. Early Holocene climatic optimum (HCO) supported an expanded establishment of a partly thermophilic vegetation. Today, we find remnants of this vegetation in sheltered regions referred to as "Arctic biodiversity hotspots". The oldest record of postglacial plant colonization to Svalbard is found in Ringhorndalen-Flatøyrdalen. Even though thermophilic species could establish also later in Holocene, only HCO was favorable for vast colonization, and only hotspots offered stable conditions for thermophilic populations throughout Holocene. Thus, these relic populations may reflect colonization patterns of HCO. We investigate whether the colonization direction of thermophilic plants (, , , , and ssp. ) in Ringhorndalen-Flatøyrdalen was uniform and different from later colonization events in other localities and non-thermophilic plants (, , , , and ). We analyzed plastid haplotypes of the 10 taxa from Ringhorndalen-Flatøyrdalen, from later-colonized localities in Svalbard, and from putative source regions outside Svalbard. Only rare and thermophilic taxa and ssp. provided results suggesting at least two colonization events from different source regions. and all the non-thermophilic plants showed no clear phylogeographically differentiation within Svalbard. Two of the thermophilic species showed no sequence variation. Based on the results, a uniform colonization direction to Svalbard in early Holocene is not probable; several source areas and dispersal directions were contemporarily involved.
对于许多北极物种,末次更新世冰川作用后的空间(重新)定殖模式已被描述。然而,它们定殖的时间方面在很大程度上仍不清楚。是否在早期有一种路径占主导,而在后期另一种路径更重要呢?北极高纬度群岛斯瓦尔巴群岛是一个很好的模型系统,可用于研究冰期后植物定殖的时间框架。在末次盛冰期期间,斯瓦尔巴群岛几乎完全被冰川覆盖,维管植物的(重新)定殖始于全新世早期。全新世早期气候适宜期(HCO)支持了部分喜温植被的广泛建立。如今,我们在被称为“北极生物多样性热点”的庇护区域发现了这种植被的残余。在灵霍恩达伦 - 弗拉托伊达伦发现了斯瓦尔巴群岛冰期后植物定殖的最古老记录。尽管喜温物种在全新世后期也能定殖,但只有气候适宜期有利于大规模定殖,并且只有热点区域在整个全新世为喜温种群提供了稳定条件。因此,这些残余种群可能反映了气候适宜期的定殖模式。我们研究了灵霍恩达伦 - 弗拉托伊达伦中喜温植物(、、、、和亚种)的定殖方向是否一致,以及是否与其他地区后期的定殖事件以及非喜温植物(、、、、和)不同。我们分析了来自灵霍恩达伦 - 弗拉托伊达伦、斯瓦尔巴群岛后期定殖地区以及斯瓦尔巴群岛以外假定源区的10个分类单元的质体单倍型。只有罕见的喜温分类单元和亚种的结果表明至少有两次来自不同源区的定殖事件。而所有非喜温植物在斯瓦尔巴群岛内均未显示出明显的系统地理学分化。其中两种喜温物种没有序列变异。基于这些结果,全新世早期向斯瓦尔巴群岛的定殖方向不太可能是一致的;同时涉及了几个源区和扩散方向。