Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai First Maternity and Infant Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jiaxing Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital, College of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023 Mar 6;14:1133566. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1133566. eCollection 2023.
Embryo selection in fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) mostly relies on morphological assessment using a conventional microscope or the time-lapse monitoring system, which is not comprehensive. Inappropriate levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the fertilization medium may cause damage to gametes, eventually leading to adverse IVF outcomes. The present study aimed to identify the optimal oxidation-reduction level in the fertilization medium for IVF outcomes by measuring the static oxidation-reduction potential (sORP) using a highly accurate and sensitive MiOXSYS system. A total of 136 patients undergoing IVF following brief incubation were divided equally into 4 groups in this prospective cohort study. The sORP value in the fertilization medium was detected using the MiOXSYS system, and its relationship with IVF outcomes was analyzed. The primary outcome was pregnancy outcomes, including live birth rate (LBR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), and implantation rate (IR). The secondary outcome was embryo quality, including fertilization rate (FR), cleavage rate (CR), available embryo rate (AER), and good-quality embryo rate (GQER). Group II (sORP: 228.7-235.3 mV) showed a higher LBR, CPR, BPR, and IR compared with Group III (sORP: 235.4-242.7 mV), presented as follows: LBR (32.0% for Group II vs 3.6% for Group III, = 0.033), CPR (32.0% for Group II vs 3.6% for Group III, = 0.033), BPR (36.0% for Group II vs 3.6% for Group III, = 0.019), and IR (31.3% for Group II vs 2.7% for Group III, = 0.003). The FR in Groups I and II had lower significant differences compared with that in Groups III and IV (71.7% and 70.3% for Groups I and II vs 83.5% and 80.4% for Groups III and IV, = 0.000). The GQER in Group I to Group IV was 32.7%, 37.4%, 26.5%, and 33.3%, respectively ( = 0.056). This study indicated that the sORP value in the fertilization medium might be a potential indicator of embryo quality and pregnancy outcome.
胚胎选择在体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)中主要依赖于使用传统显微镜或时间 lapse 监测系统进行形态评估,但这种方法并不全面。受精介质中活性氧(ROS)水平不当可能会对配子造成损伤,最终导致 IVF 结局不佳。本研究旨在通过使用高精度、高灵敏度的 MiOXSYS 系统测量静态氧化还原电位(sORP),确定 IVF 结局的最佳受精介质氧化还原水平。这项前瞻性队列研究将 136 名接受短暂孵育的 IVF 患者平均分为 4 组。使用 MiOXSYS 系统检测受精介质中的 sORP 值,并分析其与 IVF 结局的关系。主要结局是妊娠结局,包括活产率(LBR)、临床妊娠率(CPR)、生化妊娠率(BPR)和种植率(IR)。次要结局是胚胎质量,包括受精率(FR)、卵裂率(CR)、可利用胚胎率(AER)和优质胚胎率(GQER)。与 Group III(sORP:235.4-242.7 mV)相比,Group II(sORP:228.7-235.3 mV)的 LBR、CPR、BPR 和 IR 更高,结果如下:LBR(Group II 为 32.0%,Group III 为 3.6%,=0.033)、CPR(Group II 为 32.0%,Group III 为 3.6%,=0.033)、BPR(Group II 为 36.0%,Group III 为 3.6%,=0.019)和 IR(Group II 为 31.3%,Group III 为 2.7%,=0.003)。Group I 和 Group II 的 FR 与 Group III 和 Group IV 相比有显著差异(Group I 和 Group II 为 71.7%和 70.3%,Group III 和 Group IV 为 83.5%和 80.4%,=0.000)。Group I 到 Group IV 的 GQER 分别为 32.7%、37.4%、26.5%和 33.3%(=0.056)。本研究表明,受精介质中的 sORP 值可能是胚胎质量和妊娠结局的潜在指标。