Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Berkeley, United States.
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Elife. 2023 Mar 23;12:e85413. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85413.
An evolutionary perspective enhances our understanding of biological mechanisms. Comparison of sex determination and X-chromosome dosage compensation mechanisms between the closely related nematode species () and () revealed that the genetic regulatory hierarchy controlling both processes is conserved, but the X-chromosome target specificity and mode of binding for the specialized condensin dosage compensation complex (DCC) controlling X expression have diverged. We identified two motifs within DCC recruitment sites that are highly enriched on X: 13 bp MEX and 30 bp MEX II. Mutating either MEX or MEX II in an endogenous recruitment site with multiple copies of one or both motifs reduced binding, but only removing all motifs eliminated binding in vivo. Hence, DCC binding to recruitment sites appears additive. In contrast, DCC binding to recruitment sites is synergistic: mutating even one motif in vivo eliminated binding. Although all X-chromosome motifs share the sequence CAGGG, they have otherwise diverged so that a motif from one species cannot function in the other. Functional divergence was demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. A single nucleotide position in MEX can determine whether DCC binds. This rapid divergence of DCC target specificity could have been an important factor in establishing reproductive isolation between nematode species and contrasts dramatically with the conservation of target specificity for X-chromosome dosage compensation across species and for transcription factors controlling developmental processes such as body-plan specification from fruit flies to mice.
从进化角度出发,我们可以更深入地理解生物学机制。对亲缘关系密切的线虫物种()和()的性别决定和 X 染色体剂量补偿机制进行比较后发现,控制这两个过程的遗传调控层次结构是保守的,但控制 X 表达的特异性 X 染色体靶标和专用浓缩物(DCC)结合模式已经出现分歧。我们在 DCC 募集位点内鉴定出两个高度富集在 X 染色体上的基序:13bp 的 MEX 和 30bp 的 MEX II。在具有一个或两个基序的多个拷贝的内源性募集位点中突变任一 MEX 或 MEX II 都会降低结合,但仅去除所有基序就会在体内消除结合。因此,DCC 与 募集位点的结合似乎是累加的。相比之下,DCC 与 募集位点的结合具有协同作用:即使在体内突变一个基序也会消除结合。尽管所有 X 染色体基序都共享序列 CAGGG,但它们已经出现分歧,以至于一个物种的基序不能在另一个物种中发挥作用。体内和体外实验都证明了功能上的分歧。MEX 中的单个核苷酸位置可以决定 DCC 是否结合。DCC 靶标特异性的这种快速分歧可能是线虫物种之间生殖隔离的重要因素,这与 X 染色体剂量补偿在物种间以及转录因子控制从果蝇到老鼠的发育过程(如身体模式指定)的靶标特异性的保守性形成鲜明对比。