Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16-G019W, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Intensive Care Med. 2023 May;49(5):505-516. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07031-w. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
Some hospitals in the United States (US) use intensive care 20 times more than others. Since intensive care is lifesaving for some but potentially harmful for others, there is a need to understand factors that influence how intensive care unit (ICU) admission decisions are made.
A qualitative analysis of eight US hospitals was conducted with semi-structured, one-on-one interviews supplemented by site visits and clinical observations.
A total of 87 participants (24 nurses, 52 physicians, and 11 other staff) were interviewed, and 40 h were spent observing ICU operations across the eight hospitals. Four hospital-level factors were identified that influenced ICU admission decision-making. First, availability of intermediate care led to reallocation of patients who might otherwise be sent to an ICU. Second, participants stressed the importance of ICU nurse availability as a key modifier of ICU capacity. Patients cared for by experienced general care physicians and nurses were less likely to receive ICU care. Third, smaller or rural hospitals opted for longer emergency department patient-stays over ICU admission to expedite interhospital transfer of critically ill patients. Fourth, lack of clarity in ICU admission policies led clinicians to feel pressured to use ICU care for patients who might otherwise not have received it.
Health care systems should evaluate their use of ICU care and establish institutional patterns that ensure ICU admission decisions are patient-centered but also account for resources and constraints particular to each hospital.
美国(US)的一些医院对重症监护的使用是其他医院的 20 倍。由于重症监护对某些人是救命的,但对另一些人可能是有害的,因此有必要了解影响重症监护病房(ICU)入院决策的因素。
对美国 8 家医院进行了定性分析,采用半结构化的一对一访谈,并辅以现场访问和临床观察。
共访谈了 87 名参与者(24 名护士、52 名医生和 11 名其他工作人员),在 8 家医院观察 ICU 操作共 40 小时。确定了四个医院层面的因素影响 ICU 入院决策。首先,中级护理的可用性导致可能被送往 ICU 的患者重新分配。其次,参与者强调 ICU 护士可用性的重要性,认为这是 ICU 容量的关键调节因素。由经验丰富的普通医护人员照顾的患者不太可能接受 ICU 护理。第三,较小或农村医院选择让急诊科的患者住院时间延长,而不是 ICU 入院,以加快对危重病患者的医院间转移。第四,ICU 入院政策不明确导致临床医生感到压力,必须为那些可能不需要 ICU 护理的患者提供 ICU 护理。
医疗保健系统应评估其对 ICU 护理的使用情况,并制定机构模式,确保 ICU 入院决策以患者为中心,但也要考虑到每个医院特定的资源和限制。