• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因组选择循环对小麦(T. aestivum)基因组的影响。

The effect of cycles of genomic selection on the wheat (T. aestivum) genome.

机构信息

Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, 1680 Madison Av, Wooster, OH, 446591, USA.

出版信息

Theor Appl Genet. 2023 Mar 23;136(4):70. doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04279-0.

DOI:10.1007/s00122-023-04279-0
PMID:36952091
Abstract

We documented changes in the wheat genome attributed to genomic selection including loss of diversity, and changes in population structure and linkage disequilibrium patterns. We conclude that training and prediction populations need to co-evolve instead of the use of a static training population. Genomic selection (GS) is widely used in plant breeding to shorten breeding cycles. Our objective was to assess the impact of rapid cycling GS on the wheat genome. We used 3927 markers to genotype a training population (YTP) and individuals from five cycles (YC1-YC5) of GS for grain yield. We assessed changes of allele frequency, genetic distance, population structure, and linkage disequilibrium (LD). We found 27.3% of all markers had a significant allele frequency change by YC5, 18% experienced a significant change attributed to selection, and 9.3% had a significant change due to either drift or selection. A total of 725 of 3927 markers were fixed by YC5 with selection fixing 7.3% of the 725 markers. The genetic distance between cycles increased over time. The Fst value of 0.224 between YTP and YC5 indicates their relationship was low. The number LD blocks decreased over time and the correlation between LD matrices also decreased over time. Overall, we found a reduction in genetic diversity, increased genetic differentiation of cycles from the training population, and restructuring of the LD patterns over cycles. The accuracy of GS depends on the genomic similarity of the training population and the prediction populations. Our results show that the similarity can decline rapidly over cycles of GS and compromise the predictive ability of the YTP-based model. Our results support implementing a GS scheme where the training and prediction populations co-evolve instead of the use of a static training population.

摘要

我们记录了与基因组选择相关的小麦基因组变化,包括多样性丧失,以及群体结构和连锁不平衡模式的变化。我们得出结论,训练和预测群体需要共同进化,而不是使用静态训练群体。基因组选择(GS)在植物育种中被广泛用于缩短育种周期。我们的目标是评估快速循环 GS 对小麦基因组的影响。我们使用 3927 个标记对一个训练群体(YTP)和五个 GS 循环(YC1-YC5)的个体进行了基因型分析,以评估其产量。我们评估了等位基因频率、遗传距离、群体结构和连锁不平衡(LD)的变化。我们发现,在 YC5 时,所有标记中有 27.3%的标记的等位基因频率发生了显著变化,18%的标记的变化归因于选择,9.3%的标记的变化归因于漂变或选择。在 YC5 时,共有 725 个标记固定下来,其中 7.3%的固定是由选择引起的。遗传距离随时间增加而增加。YC5 与 YTP 之间的 Fst 值为 0.224,表明它们之间的关系较低。随着时间的推移,LD 块的数量减少,LD 矩阵之间的相关性也随着时间的推移而降低。总的来说,我们发现遗传多样性减少,各循环与训练群体之间的遗传分化增加,LD 模式随循环而重构。GS 的准确性取决于训练群体和预测群体的基因组相似性。我们的结果表明,相似性在 GS 的循环中会迅速下降,从而影响基于 YTP 的模型的预测能力。我们的结果支持实施 GS 方案,其中训练和预测群体共同进化,而不是使用静态训练群体。

相似文献

1
The effect of cycles of genomic selection on the wheat (T. aestivum) genome.基因组选择循环对小麦(T. aestivum)基因组的影响。
Theor Appl Genet. 2023 Mar 23;136(4):70. doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04279-0.
2
High-throughput phenotyping platforms enhance genomic selection for wheat grain yield across populations and cycles in early stage.高通量表型平台在早期阶段增强了对小麦籽粒产量的全基因组选择在不同群体和周期中的效果。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Jun;132(6):1705-1720. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03309-0. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
3
The value of early-stage phenotyping for wheat breeding in the age of genomic selection.基因组选择时代小麦早期表型选择的价值。
Theor Appl Genet. 2020 Aug;133(8):2499-2520. doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03613-0. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
4
Genomic Prediction for Grain Yield and Yield-Related Traits in Chinese Winter Wheat.中国冬小麦产量及产量相关性状的基因组预测。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 17;21(4):1342. doi: 10.3390/ijms21041342.
5
Accuracy of Genomic Selection in a Rice Synthetic Population Developed for Recurrent Selection Breeding.用于轮回选择育种的水稻合成群体中基因组选择的准确性
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 27;10(8):e0136594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136594. eCollection 2015.
6
Phenomic selection in wheat breeding: identification and optimisation of factors influencing prediction accuracy and comparison to genomic selection.小麦育种中的表型组选择:影响预测准确性的因素的鉴定与优化以及与基因组选择的比较
Theor Appl Genet. 2022 Mar;135(3):895-914. doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-04005-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
Genome-wide variation patterns between landraces and cultivars uncover divergent selection during modern wheat breeding.在现代小麦育种过程中,地方品种和栽培品种之间的全基因组变异模式揭示了不同的选择。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Sep;132(9):2509-2523. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03367-4. Epub 2019 May 28.
8
Gains through selection for grain yield in a winter wheat breeding program.在冬小麦育种计划中,通过选择获得的谷物产量增益。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 28;15(4):e0221603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221603. eCollection 2020.
9
Optimizing Training Population Data and Validation of Genomic Selection for Economic Traits in Soft Winter Wheat.优化软质冬小麦经济性状基因组选择的训练群体数据及验证
G3 (Bethesda). 2016 Sep 8;6(9):2919-28. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.032532.
10
Training population selection and use of fixed effects to optimize genomic predictions in a historical USA winter wheat panel.训练群体选择和固定效应的使用,以优化美国历史冬小麦面板的基因组预测。
Theor Appl Genet. 2019 Apr;132(4):1247-1261. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03276-6. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic Prediction for Germplasm Improvement Through Inter-Heterotic-Group Line Crossing in Maize.通过玉米杂种优势群间系谱杂交进行种质改良的基因组预测
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 15;26(6):2662. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062662.
2
Integration of machine learning and genome-wide association study to explore the genomic prediction accuracy of agronomic trait in oats (Avena sativa L.).整合机器学习与全基因组关联研究以探究燕麦(Avena sativa L.)农艺性状的基因组预测准确性。
Plant Genome. 2025 Mar;18(1):e20549. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20549.

本文引用的文献

1
Genome-enabled prediction for sparse testing in multi-environmental wheat trials.基于基因组的预测在多环境小麦试验中的稀疏测试。
Plant Genome. 2021 Nov;14(3):e20151. doi: 10.1002/tpg2.20151. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
2
How genomic selection has increased rates of genetic gain and inbreeding in the Australian national herd, genomic information nucleus, and bulls.基因组选择如何提高澳大利亚国家牛群、基因组信息核心和公牛的遗传增益和近交率。
J Dairy Sci. 2021 Nov;104(11):11832-11849. doi: 10.3168/jds.2021-20326. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
3
Scalable Sparse Testing Genomic Selection Strategy for Early Yield Testing Stage.
用于早期产量测试阶段的可扩展稀疏测试基因组选择策略。
Front Plant Sci. 2021 Jun 22;12:658978. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.658978. eCollection 2021.
4
Genetic Variation, GWAS and Accuracy of Prediction for Host Resistance to in Farmed Gilthead Sea Bream ().养殖金头鲷对[具体病原体未提及]宿主抗性的遗传变异、全基因组关联研究及预测准确性
Front Genet. 2020 Dec 22;11:594770. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.594770. eCollection 2020.
5
Genome-Wide Association Mapping for Leaf Tip Necrosis and Pseudo-black Chaff in Relation to Durable Rust Resistance in Wheat.与小麦持久抗锈性相关的叶尖坏死和假黑颖壳的全基因组关联图谱分析
Plant Genome. 2015 Jul;8(2):eplantgenome2015.01.0002. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2015.01.0002.
6
The value of early-stage phenotyping for wheat breeding in the age of genomic selection.基因组选择时代小麦早期表型选择的价值。
Theor Appl Genet. 2020 Aug;133(8):2499-2520. doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03613-0. Epub 2020 Jun 1.
7
Effect of genomic selection on rate of inbreeding and coancestry and effective population size of Holstein and Jersey cattle populations.基因组选择对荷斯坦和泽西牛群体近交率、亲缘关系和有效群体大小的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jun;103(6):5183-5199. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-18013. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
8
: An R package for population genetic simulation and numerical analysis.一个用于群体遗传模拟和数值分析的R软件包。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Jul 1;9(14):7896-7902. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5412. eCollection 2019 Jul.
9
gpart: human genome partitioning and visualization of high-density SNP data by identifying haplotype blocks.gpart:通过识别单倍型块对高密度 SNP 数据进行人类基因组分区和可视化。
Bioinformatics. 2019 Nov 1;35(21):4419-4421. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz308.
10
Crop Biodiversity: An Unfinished Magnum Opus of Nature.作物生物多样性:大自然尚未完成的巨著。
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2019 Apr 29;70:727-751. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042817-040240.