• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与美国肾脏移植机会健康不公平相关的因素:范围综述。

Factors associated with health inequities in access to kidney transplantation in the USA: A scoping review.

机构信息

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States of America.

Office of Medical Student Research, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, OK, United States of America.

出版信息

Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2023 Apr;37(2):100751. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2023.100751. Epub 2023 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.trre.2023.100751
PMID:36958131
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The kidney is the most needed organ for transplantation in the United States. However, demand and scarcity of this organ has caused significant inequities for historically marginalized groups. In this review, we report on the frequency of inequities in all steps of kidney transplantation from 2016 to 2022. Search criteria was based on the National Institute of Health's (NIH) 2022 list of populations who experience health inequities, which includes: race and ethnicity; sex or gender; Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer + (LGBTQ+); underserved rural communities; education level; income; and occupation status. We outline steps for future research aimed at assessing interventions and programs to improve health outcomes.

METHODS

This scoping review was developed following guidelines from the Joanna Briggs Institute and PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. In July 2022, we searched Medline (via PubMed) and Ovid Embase databases to identify articles addressing inequities in access to kidney transplantation in the United States. Articles had to address at least one of the NIH's 2022 health inequity groups.

RESULTS

Our sample of 44 studies indicate that Black race, female sex or gender, and low socioeconomic status are negatively associated with referral, evaluation, and waitlisting for kidney transplantation. Furthermore, only two studies from our sample investigated LGBTQ+ identity since the NIH's addition of SGM in 2016 regarding access to transplantation. Lastly, we found no detectable trend in studies for the four most investigated inequity groups between 2016 and 2022.

CONCLUSION

Investigations in inequities for access to kidney transplantation for the two most studied groups, race/ethnicity and sex or gender, have shown no change in frequencies. Regarding race and ethnicity, continued interventions focused on educating Black patients and staff of dialysis facilities may increase transplant rates. Studies aimed at assessing effectiveness of the Kidney Paired Donation program are highly warranted due to incompatibility problems in female patients. The sparse representation for the LGBTQ+ population may be due to a lack of standardized data collection for sexual orientation. We recommend this community be engaged via surveys and further investigations.

摘要

背景

在美国,肾脏是最需要进行移植的器官。然而,这种器官的需求和短缺导致历史上被边缘化的群体面临着严重的不平等。在本综述中,我们报告了 2016 年至 2022 年期间,肾脏移植所有阶段的不平等现象的发生频率。检索标准基于美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)2022 年列出的经历健康不平等的人群,包括:种族和民族;性别;女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿+(LGBTQ+);服务不足的农村社区;教育水平;收入;和职业地位。我们概述了未来旨在评估干预措施和方案以改善健康结果的研究步骤。

方法

本范围综述是根据 Joanna Briggs 研究所和 PRISMA 扩展用于范围综述的指南制定的。2022 年 7 月,我们检索了 Medline(通过 PubMed)和 Ovid Embase 数据库,以确定在美国解决肾脏移植机会不平等问题的文章。文章必须至少涉及 NIH 2022 年健康不平等群体中的一个。

结果

我们的 44 项研究样本表明,黑人种族、女性性别或性别以及低社会经济地位与肾脏移植的转诊、评估和等候名单呈负相关。此外,由于 NIH 自 2016 年以来将 SGM 纳入 LGBTQ+身份,我们的样本中只有两项研究调查了 LGBTQ+身份与移植机会的关系。最后,我们没有发现 2016 年至 2022 年期间,在对这四个最受调查的不平等群体进行的研究中存在任何可检测的趋势。

结论

对种族和民族以及性别或性别这两个研究最多的群体获得肾脏移植机会的不平等调查显示,其频率没有变化。关于种族,继续对黑人患者和透析设施工作人员进行教育的干预措施可能会提高移植率。由于女性患者在肾脏配对捐赠计划中存在不兼容问题,因此非常需要评估该计划效果的研究。LGBTQ+群体的代表性稀缺可能是由于缺乏标准化的性取向数据收集所致。我们建议通过调查和进一步研究让该群体参与进来。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with health inequities in access to kidney transplantation in the USA: A scoping review.与美国肾脏移植机会健康不公平相关的因素:范围综述。
Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2023 Apr;37(2):100751. doi: 10.1016/j.trre.2023.100751. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
2
The Current State of Health Inequities in COPD.COPD 中健康不平等的现状。
Respir Care. 2024 Jan 24;69(2):238-249. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10553.
3
Inequities and Research Gaps in Ophthalmology: A Scoping Review.眼科学中的不平等和研究差距:范围综述。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan 1;141(1):63-70. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.5237.
4
Health inequities in dialysis care: A scoping review.透析护理中的健康不公平现象:范围综述。
Semin Dial. 2023 Nov-Dec;36(6):430-447. doi: 10.1111/sdi.13176. Epub 2023 Sep 21.
5
Health Inequities in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery in the United States: A Scoping Review.美国矫形创伤外科中的健康不平等:范围综述。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2023 May 1;31(9):e489-e503. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-22-00710. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
6
The Impact of Generative Conversational Artificial Intelligence on the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Community: Scoping Review.生成式对话人工智能对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别和酷儿群体的影响:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 6;25:e52091. doi: 10.2196/52091.
7
Health Inequities in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Literature: A Scoping Review.冠状动脉旁路移植术文献中的健康不平等:范围综述。
Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Jun;48(6):101640. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101640. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
8
Health inequities in mammography: A scoping review.乳腺癌筛查中的健康不公平现象:范围综述。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Mar;160:110693. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110693. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
9
A scoping review of empirical research on firearms and firearm violence among sexual and gender minority populations in the United States.对美国性少数群体和性别少数群体中枪支及枪支暴力的实证研究的范围综述。
Ann Behav Med. 2025 Jan 4;59(1). doi: 10.1093/abm/kaae094.
10
What Is the Representation of Sexual and Gender Minority Identities Among Orthopaedic Professionals in the United States?美国矫形外科专业人员中的性少数群体和性别少数群体认同的代表性如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Aug 1;482(8):1313-1321. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003079. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Life on the Line: Prioritizing Equity in Kidney Transplantation for Populations Marginalized by Race and Ethnicity.生死攸关:为因种族和族裔而被边缘化的人群在肾脏移植中优先实现公平。
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2025 Apr 10;12:20543581251331076. doi: 10.1177/20543581251331076. eCollection 2025.
2
Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Outcomes After the 2014 Kidney Allocation System Change.2014 年肾脏分配系统改变后高致敏肾脏移植的结局。
Prog Transplant. 2024 Sep;34(3):70-80. doi: 10.1177/15269248241268697. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
3
Experience of Chronic Kidney Disease and Perceptions of Transplantation by Sex.
性别视角下的慢性肾脏病体验和对移植的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 1;7(7):e2424993. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24993.
4
Characterizing proximity and transfers of deceased organ donors to donor care units in the United States.描述美国器官捐献者与供者关怀单位的距离和转移情况。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Jun;24(6):983-992. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.007. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
5
Intersectional race and gender disparities in kidney transplant access in the United States: a scoping review.美国肾脏移植获取方面的交叉性种族与性别差异:一项范围综述
BMC Nephrol. 2024 Jan 25;25(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03453-2.
6
Expanding Access to Living Donor Kidney Transplants Through Social Networks.通过社交网络扩大活体供肾移植的可及性。
Kidney Med. 2023 May 6;5(6):100654. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2023.100654. eCollection 2023 Jun.