Division of Nephrology, Columbia University, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University Renal Epidemiology (CURE) group, New York, NY, USA.
Prog Transplant. 2024 Sep;34(3):70-80. doi: 10.1177/15269248241268697. Epub 2024 Aug 1.
Kidney Allocation System (KAS) was implemented by United Network for Organ Sharing in 2014 to reduce allocation disparities. Outcomes of highly sensitized patients (calculated panel reactive antibody (cPRA) ≥ 97%) before and after KAS were compared to low-risk recipients (cPRA <10%) in the post-KAS era were examined. The impact on racial disparities was determined. This was a retrospective study of national registry data. Two cohorts of adult candidates waitlisted for deceased donor transplantation during 3-year periods before and after KAS were identified. Highly sensitized patients (N = 1238 and 4687) received a deceased donor kidney transplant between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013 and between January 1, 2015 and December, 31, 2017. Racial disparity for highly sensitized patients improved, yet remained significant (P < 0.001), with Black patients comprising 40% and 41% of the highly sensitized candidates and 28% and 34% of the recipients pre- and post-KAS. While posttransplant death-censored graft failure for highly sensitized recipients was similar overall, post-KAS was associated with improved graft survival in the first year after transplant (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40-0.78). When compared to contemporaneous lowrisk recipients, both death-censored and all-cause graft failure were similar for highly sensitized recipients and was associated with increased risk for death-censored graft failure beyond the first year (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.11-1.73). The allocation system led to an increase in transplantation in highly sensitized candidates without compromising outcomes. Although KAS has led to more balanced transplant rates between highly sensitized Black and White patients, racial inequalities persist.
肾脏分配系统(KAS)于 2014 年由联合器官共享网络实施,以减少分配差距。比较了 KAS 前后高度敏感患者(计算的面板反应性抗体(cPRA)≥97%)的结果,并在 KAS 后时代检查了低危受者(cPRA <10%)的结果。确定了对种族差异的影响。这是一项全国登记数据的回顾性研究。确定了 KAS 前后 3 年期间等待已故供体移植的成年候选者的两个队列。2011 年 1 月 1 日至 2013 年 12 月 31 日和 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日之间,高度敏感的患者(N=1238 和 4687)接受了已故供体肾移植。高度敏感患者的种族差异有所改善,但仍有显著差异(P<0.001),KAS 前后黑人患者分别占高度敏感候选者的 40%和 41%,占受者的 28%和 34%。尽管高度敏感受者的移植后死亡校正移植物失败总体相似,但 KAS 后第一年的移植物存活率有所提高(HR 0.56,95%CI 0.40-0.78)。与同期低危受者相比,高度敏感受者的死亡校正和全因移植物失败相似,且 KAS 后一年以上死亡校正移植物失败的风险增加(HR 1.39,95%CI 1.11-1.73)。分配系统导致高度敏感患者的移植增加,而不会影响结果。尽管 KAS 导致高度敏感的黑人和白人患者之间的移植率更加平衡,但种族不平等仍然存在。