• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回顾社区主导的全面卫生(CLTS)方法实施后,从无露天排便(ODF)状态向露天排便(OD)转变的滑动因素。

Review of the slippage factors from open defecation-free (ODF) status towards open defecation (OD) after the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach implementation.

机构信息

Laboratoire Eau, Hydro-Systèmes et Agriculture (LEHSA), Institut International d'Ingénierie de l'Eau et de l'Environnement (2iE), 01 BP 594, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso.

Laboratoire Eau, Hydro-Systèmes et Agriculture (LEHSA), Institut International d'Ingénierie de l'Eau et de l'Environnement (2iE), 01 BP 594, Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso.

出版信息

Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023 May;250:114160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114160. Epub 2023 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114160
PMID:36958189
Abstract

Open-defecation (OD) is one of the most widespread sanitation practices in low-income countries. This practice often causes diarrheal diseases and 760,000 deaths per year. To eradicate OD, several approaches have been developed, including Community-Led-Total Sanitation (CLTS) which is a participatory and community approach. The specificity of CLTS is that it is managed by the community itself, as its name implies, and that no subsidies or financial contributions from outside the community are used in the construction of the facilities. Although, the CLTS is effective in the short-term for eradicating OD, the long-term results are not encouraging: Open-Defecation-Free (ODF) communities revert to OD or partially use latrines. The present research is based on literature review and authors investigation in Burkina Faso. It was conducted to provide a comprehensive understanding of the factors that affect the sustainability of ODF-status leading to slippage in communities. It was found that these factors can be grouped into five categories: behavioral and social, technological, organizational, and vulnerability factors. The last one, socio-political factors, is a contribution from the authors as it was not reported in the literature yet. The authors have proposed graphical synthesis of all the slippage factors and their associated categories in the ODF-communities. Finally, authors have suggested that to sustain ODF-status of communities: include all stages of the sanitation value chain (SVC) in the CLTS, the follow-up activities after achieving ODF-status must be planned well in advance, sanitation marketing should be developed and the sanctions against the practice of OD have to be reinforced. Governments and donors should pay particular attention to the following options: raising awareness and regular monitoring after ODF certification, encouraging research on sustainable and pro-poor sanitation technologies, and building the capacity of implementing actors including facilitators. While obtaining ODF status is materialized by a sign with the status on it, this paper drew the attention of CLTS implementers to the lack of materialization of slippage when it occurs, and the absence of studies on the evolution of the community sanitation scale after ODF-status.

摘要

露天排便(OD)是低收入国家最普遍的卫生实践之一。这种做法经常导致腹泻病和每年 76 万人死亡。为了消除 OD,已经开发了几种方法,包括社区主导的整体卫生(CLTS),这是一种参与式和社区方法。CLTS 的特殊性在于,顾名思义,它由社区自己管理,而且在设施建设中不使用社区以外的任何补贴或财政捐款。尽管 CLTS 在短期内消除 OD 非常有效,但长期效果并不令人鼓舞:无露天排便(ODF)社区会恢复 OD 或部分使用厕所。本研究基于文献综述和在布基纳法索的作者调查,旨在提供对影响 ODF 状态可持续性导致社区滑坡的因素的全面理解。研究发现,这些因素可以分为五类:行为和社会、技术、组织和脆弱性因素。最后一个,社会政治因素,是作者的贡献,因为它在文献中尚未报道。作者提出了所有滑坡因素及其在 ODF 社区中的相关类别综合图形的建议。最后,作者建议为了维持社区的 ODF 状态:将卫生价值链(SVC)的所有阶段都纳入 CLTS,在实现 ODF 状态后必须提前计划好后续活动,应该发展卫生营销,并加强对 OD 做法的制裁。政府和捐助者应特别注意以下选项:在 ODF 认证后提高认识和定期监测,鼓励对可持续和有利于穷人的卫生技术进行研究,并建立包括促进者在内的实施行为者的能力。虽然 ODF 状态的获得是通过带有状态的标志来实现的,但本文提请 CLTS 执行者注意在发生滑坡时缺乏实现,以及在获得 ODF 状态后社区卫生规模演变的研究不足。

相似文献

1
Review of the slippage factors from open defecation-free (ODF) status towards open defecation (OD) after the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach implementation.回顾社区主导的全面卫生(CLTS)方法实施后,从无露天排便(ODF)状态向露天排便(OD)转变的滑动因素。
Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2023 May;250:114160. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2023.114160. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
2
Factors influencing community-led total sanitation (CLTS) implementation abandonment before achieving open defecation-free (ODF) status: case study of the Central-Western region of Burkina Faso.影响社区主导的全面卫生(CLTS)在实现无露天排便(ODF)状态之前被放弃的因素:布基纳法索中西部地区的案例研究。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Dec;30(60):125628-125645. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-31142-y. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
3
Can open-defecation free (ODF) communities be sustained? A cross-sectional study in rural Ghana.能否维持无露天排便(ODF)社区?加纳农村的一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 7;17(1):e0261674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261674. eCollection 2022.
4
Analysis of behavioral change techniques in community-led total sanitation programs.社区主导的全面卫生计划中行为改变技术的分析
Health Promot Int. 2015 Mar;30(1):16-28. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dau073. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
5
The Impact of Pro-Poor Sanitation Subsidies in Open Defecation-Free Communities: A Randomized, Controlled Trial in Rural Ghana.《贫困导向卫生设施补贴对无露天排便社区的影响:加纳农村地区的一项随机对照试验》。
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 Jun;130(6):67004. doi: 10.1289/EHP10443. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
6
Role of Implementation Factors for the Success of Community-Led Total Sanitation on Latrine Coverage. A Case Study from Rural Ghana.实施因素在社区主导的整体卫生运动对厕所普及率的成功中的作用。来自加纳农村的案例研究。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 May 7;53(9):5466-5472. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b01055. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
7
Improving Uptake and Sustainability of Sanitation Interventions in Timor-Leste: A Case Study.提高东帝汶卫生设施干预措施的接受度和可持续性:案例研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 24;18(3):1013. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031013.
8
Sustainability of facilities built under the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) implementation: Moving from basic to safe facilities on the sanitation ladder.社区主导的整体卫生(CLTS)实施下建造的设施的可持续性:在卫生设施阶梯上从基本设施迈向安全设施。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0293395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293395. eCollection 2023.
9
Comprehending practitioners' assessments of community-led total sanitation.理解社区主导的整体卫生从业者评估。
Health Promot Int. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):e129-e138. doi: 10.1093/heapro/day070.
10
Community-Led Total Sanitation, Open Defecation Free Status, and Ebola Virus Disease in Lofa County, Liberia.利比里亚洛法县的社区主导全面卫生、无露天排便状况与埃博拉病毒病
J Health Commun. 2017;22(sup1):72-80. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2016.1242671.

引用本文的文献

1
Household ownership of latrines does not ensure use: a scoping review.家庭拥有厕所并不确保会使用:一项范围综述
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Aug 14;3(2):e001527. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2024-001527. eCollection 2025.
2
Effect of community-led total sanitation on open defecation in Uganda: A propensity score-matched analysis.社区主导的全面卫生设施对乌干达露天排便的影响:倾向得分匹配分析
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 24;20(7):e0329307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329307. eCollection 2025.
3
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene for Everyone Intervention Study: Protocol for a Controlled Before-and-After Trial.
人人享有水、环境卫生和个人卫生干预研究:一项前后对照试验的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 15;14:e68280. doi: 10.2196/68280.
4
The persistence of failure in water, sanitation and hygiene programming: a qualitative study.水、环境卫生与个人卫生项目中持续存在的失败问题:一项定性研究
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Feb 24;10(2):e016354. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016354.
5
Inclusion of persons living with disabilities in a district-wide sanitation programme: A cross-sectional study in rural Malawi.将残疾人纳入全地区卫生计划:马拉维农村地区的一项横断面研究。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Aug 29;4(8):e0003005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003005. eCollection 2024.
6
Sustainability of facilities built under the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) implementation: Moving from basic to safe facilities on the sanitation ladder.社区主导的整体卫生(CLTS)实施下建造的设施的可持续性:在卫生设施阶梯上从基本设施迈向安全设施。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0293395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293395. eCollection 2023.
7
Prevalence of zero-sanitation in India: Patterns of change across the states and Union Territories, 1993-2021.印度零卫生设施的流行情况:1993-2021 年各邦和联邦属地的变化模式。
J Glob Health. 2023 Jul 28;13:04082. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.04082.