Lázaro-González Alba, Andivia Enrique, Hampe Arndt, Hasegawa Shun, Marzano Raffaella, Santos Ana M C, Castro Jorge, Leverkus Alexandro B
Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Granada, 18071, Granada, Spain; INRAE, University of Bordeaux, BIOGECO, F-33610, Cestas, France.
Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jul 1;337:117713. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117713. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
Roughly 2 billion ha of land are degraded and in need of ecological restoration worldwide. Active restoration frequently involves revegetation, which leads to the dilemma of whether to conduct direct seeding or to plant nursery-grown seedlings. The choice of revegetation method can regulate plant survival and performance, with economic implications that ultimately feed back to our capacity to conduct restoration. We followed a peer-reviewed protocol to develop a systematic map that collates, describes and catalogues the available studies on how seeding compares to planting in achieving restoration targets. We compiled a database with the characteristics of all retrieved studies, which can be searched to identify studies of particular locations and habitats, objectives of restoration, plant material, technical aspects, and outcomes measured. The search was made in eight languages and retrieved 3355 publications, of which 178 were retained. The systematic map identifies research gaps, such as a lack of studies in the global South, in tropical rainforests, and covering a long time period, which represent opportunities to expand field-based research. Additionally, many studies overlooked reporting on important technical aspects such as seed provenance and nursery cultivation methods, and others such as watering or seedling protection were more frequently applied for planting than for seeding, which limits our capacity to learn from past research. Most studies measured outcomes related to the target plants but avoided measuring general restoration outcomes or economic aspects. This represents a relevant gap in research, as the choice of revegetation method is greatly based on economic aspects and the achievement of restoration goals goes beyond the establishment of plants. Finally, we identified a substantial volume of studies conducted in temperate regions and over short periods (0-5 y). This research cluster calls for a future in-depth synthesis, potentially through meta-analysis, to reveal the overall balance between seeding and planting and assess whether the response to this question is mediated by species traits, environmental characteristics, or technical aspects. Besides identifying research clusters and gaps, the systematic map database allows managers to find the most relevant scientific literature on the appropriateness of seeding vs. planting for particular conditions, such as certain species or habitats.
全球约有20亿公顷土地退化,需要进行生态修复。主动修复通常涉及植被恢复,这就产生了是直接播种还是种植苗圃培育的幼苗的两难问题。植被恢复方法的选择可以调节植物的存活率和生长表现,其经济影响最终会反馈到我们进行修复的能力上。我们遵循同行评审的方案,绘制了一份系统地图,整理、描述并编目了关于播种与种植在实现修复目标方面的比较的现有研究。我们编制了一个包含所有检索到的研究特征的数据库,可以通过该数据库搜索特定地点和栖息地、修复目标、植物材料、技术方面以及测量结果的研究。搜索使用了八种语言,共检索到3355篇出版物,其中178篇被保留。该系统地图确定了研究空白,例如全球南方、热带雨林地区缺乏研究,以及缺乏长期研究,这些都是扩大实地研究的机会。此外,许多研究忽略了报告重要的技术方面,如种子来源和苗圃培育方法,而浇水或幼苗保护等其他方面在种植中比在播种中应用得更频繁,这限制了我们从过去研究中学习的能力。大多数研究测量了与目标植物相关的结果,但没有测量总体修复结果或经济方面。这是研究中的一个相关空白,因为植被恢复方法的选择很大程度上基于经济方面,而修复目标的实现不仅仅是植物的建立。最后,我们发现大量研究是在温带地区进行的,且时间较短(0 - 5年)。这一研究集群需要未来进行深入综合分析,可能通过荟萃分析,以揭示播种和种植之间的总体平衡,并评估对这个问题的回答是否由物种特征、环境特征或技术方面介导。除了确定研究集群和空白外,该系统地图数据库还允许管理人员找到关于特定条件(如某些物种或栖息地)下播种与种植适宜性的最相关科学文献。