Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Dante Pazzanese Institute of Cardiology, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jun 1;380:20-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.03.042. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
Provocative maneuvers have the potential to overcome the low sensitivity of resting echocardiography and biomarkers in the detection of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We investigate the mechanical response of the left ventricle to an afterload challenge in patients with preclinical and early-stage HFpEF (es-HFpEF).
Three groups of patients (non-HFpEF - n = 42, pre-HFpEF - n = 43, and es-HFpEF - n = 39) underwent echocardiography at rest and during an afterload challenge induced by handgrip maneuver combined with pneumatic constriction of limbs.
Patients in the non-HF group displayed a median ΔLPSS = -4% (IQR: -10%, +2%), LPSS rest<16% in 3/42(7%) and LPSS stress<16% in 6/43(14%). Subjects in the pre-HFpEF group displayed median ΔLPSS = -3% (IQR: -10%, +5%) LPSS rest<16% in 13/43(30%) and LPSS stress<16% in 19/43 (44%). 11/43 (25%) subjects in this group increased at least one absolute point in LPSS during stress. Patients in es-HFpEF group displayed a median ΔLPSS = -10% (IQR: -18%, -1%), LPSS rest<16% in 15/39(38%) and LPSS stress<16% in 25/39(64%). Changes in LPSS (ΔLPSS) were significantly greater in es-HFpEF than pre-HFpEF (p = 0.022). In multivariate analysis, this group effect was maintained after adjustment of the LPSS for systolic blood pressure, use of β-blockers, LV mass, RWT, age, and sex.
Our data suggest that patients with HFpEF have a marked decrease in peak strain during acute pressure overload. Longitudinal studies are needed to test and compare the clinical impact of each pattern in early and long-term follow-ups.
在检测射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF)中,有创性操作有可能克服静息超声心动图和生物标志物的低敏感性。我们研究了左心室在有临床前和早期 HFpEF(es-HFpEF)患者中的负荷挑战下的机械反应。
三组患者(非 HFpEF- n=42,pre-HFpEF- n=43,es-HFpEF- n=39)在静息状态和手部握力操作联合四肢气动收缩引起的后负荷挑战下进行超声心动图检查。
非 HF 组患者的中位 ΔLPSS=-4%(IQR:-10%,+2%),42 例中有 3 例(7%)LPSS 静息<16%,43 例中有 6 例(14%)LPSS 应激<16%。pre-HFpEF 组患者的中位 ΔLPSS=-3%(IQR:-10%,+5%),43 例中有 13 例(30%)LPSS 静息<16%,43 例中有 19 例(44%)LPSS 应激<16%。该组中有 11 例(25%)患者在应激时 LPSS 至少增加了一个绝对值。es-HFpEF 组患者的中位 ΔLPSS=-10%(IQR:-18%,-1%),39 例中有 15 例(38%)LPSS 静息<16%,39 例中有 25 例(64%)LPSS 应激<16%。es-HFpEF 组 LPSS(ΔLPSS)的变化明显大于 pre-HFpEF(p=0.022)。在多变量分析中,在调整 LPSS 与收缩压、β受体阻滞剂的使用、LV 质量、RWT、年龄和性别后,这种组间差异仍然存在。
我们的数据表明,HFpEF 患者在急性压力超负荷时峰值应变明显下降。需要进行纵向研究来测试和比较每种模式在早期和长期随访中的临床影响。