Department of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Kawagoe, Saitama, Japan
Department of Pediatrics, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Iruma, Saitama, Japan.
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 23;13(3):e069314. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069314.
Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) causes severe morbidity in premature infants. Although the use of indomethacin is the standard therapy for PDA, it is sometimes not applicable because of its adverse effects, such as renal and platelet dysfunctions. Paracetamol has emerged as an alternative to indomethacin owing to its excellent safety profile in infants. Of the recently reported case series and clinical trials on the use of paracetamol for PDA, there are few reports in Japan on paracetamol use in preterm infants. Furthermore, indications for the use of paracetamol for PDA have not been approved for use in PDA. While the safety of intravenous paracetamol therapy in case series of preterm infants treated for haemodynamically significant PDA (hsPDA) has been reported, studies which were conducted to compare paracetamol to indomethacin are limited. We, therefore, intend to investigate the hypothesis that intravenous administration of paracetamol has superior safety over indomethacin.
Multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial for intravenous administration of paracetamol for PDA in preterm infants. The inclusion criteria are (1) hsPDA, (2) gestational age from 24 to 34 weeks and birth weight (BW) from 500 to 2000 g, (3) enrolment between 24 hours and 7 days from birth and (4) obtaining parental consent. The primary outcome is renal dysfunction within 48 hours from the last dose of the study drug. Enrolled patients fulfilling all the inclusion criteria are randomly allocated to either intravenous paracetamol or intravenous indomethacin. This trial requires 110 patients.
The clinical trial would follow Japan's Clinical Trials Act. The trial protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Review Board of Saitama Medical University (approval number: 222001). A written informed consent would be obtained from one of the parents. The results are expected to be published in a scientific journal.
jRCTs031220386.
31 March 2022, version 1.0.
动脉导管未闭(PDA)会给早产儿带来严重的发病风险。尽管使用吲哚美辛是治疗 PDA 的标准疗法,但由于其会导致肾脏和血小板功能障碍等副作用,有时并不适用。由于对婴儿安全性良好,扑热息痛已成为吲哚美辛的替代品。在最近报道的关于扑热息痛治疗 PDA 的病例系列和临床试验中,日本关于早产儿使用扑热息痛的报告很少。此外,扑热息痛治疗 PDA 的适应证尚未被批准用于 PDA。虽然静脉注射扑热息痛治疗有临床意义的动脉导管未闭(hsPDA)早产儿的病例系列报告了其安全性,但比较扑热息痛与吲哚美辛的研究有限。因此,我们旨在验证扑热息痛静脉给药的安全性优于吲哚美辛的假设。
一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验,旨在研究静脉注射扑热息痛治疗早产儿 PDA。纳入标准为:(1)hsPDA;(2)胎龄 24 至 34 周,出生体重 500 至 2000g;(3)生后 24 小时至 7 天入组;(4)获得家长同意。主要结局为研究药物末次给药后 48 小时内肾功能障碍。符合所有纳入标准的患者随机分为静脉注射扑热息痛或静脉注射吲哚美辛组。本试验需要 110 例患者。
临床试验将遵循日本临床试验法。试验方案已获得埼玉医科大学临床研究审查委员会的批准(批准号:222001)。将从父母一方获得书面知情同意。研究结果预计将在科学期刊上发表。
jRCTs031220386。
2022 年 3 月 31 日,版本 1.0。