Esthetic Restorative and Implant Dentistry Program, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Jun;25(3):511-518. doi: 10.1111/cid.13201. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
Dynamic Computer Assisted Implant Surgery (CAIS) systems have been shown to improve accuracy of implant placement, thus training in the use of such systems is becoming increasingly important. There is a scarcity of research on how to implement dynamic CAIS training in the settings of postgraduate university education.
To determine the effectiveness of two modes of CAIS training programs on motor skill acquisition of novice surgeons.
Thirty-six postgraduate students without experience in dynamic CAIS systems were randomly assigned to a distributed training program (3 training sessions over 3 days) or a massed training (3 training sessions over the same day). A post-test involving the placement of one implant was conducted for both groups, 7 days after completion of the training. Surgical time and implant accuracy were recorded and analyzed, using independent t-tests, with 0.05 significant level.
Both groups reached the accuracy benchmarks expected by current standards in the use of CAIS. No significant differences with regards to accuracy were found between the groups, but a trend was documented favoring performance of distributed (mean difference-0.4, 95% confidence interval-0.7-0.1) in the accuracy at platform level. Distributed training students performed faster than massed for the third trial (mean difference-95.0, 95% confidence interval-178.8 to -11.2).
Novice students reached the accuracy benchmarks with the use of CAIS through both a massed and a distributed training program, while there was a strong but marginally not significant trend for higher accuracy in the distributed group. Students who received the training in the distributed format over the process of different days, performed faster. Trial registered in Thai Clinical Trials Registry: https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20230109002. This clinical trial was not registered prior to participant recruitment and randomization.
动态计算机辅助种植手术(CAIS)系统已被证明可以提高种植体放置的准确性,因此对这类系统的使用培训变得越来越重要。在研究生大学教育环境中实施动态 CAIS 培训的相关研究还很匮乏。
确定两种 CAIS 培训模式对新手外科医生手术技能习得的效果。
36 名没有动态 CAIS 系统经验的研究生被随机分配到分布式培训项目(3 天内 3 次培训)或集中式培训(同一天内 3 次培训)。两组均在培训结束后 7 天进行一次植入物植入的后测,记录并分析手术时间和植入物准确性,使用独立 t 检验,显著水平为 0.05。
两组均达到了当前 CAIS 使用标准所预期的准确性基准。但组间在准确性方面无显著差异,不过记录到分布式(平均差异-0.4,95%置信区间-0.7 至-0.1)在平台水平的准确性上表现出优势的趋势。分布式培训的学生在第三次试验中比集中式培训的学生更快(平均差异-95.0,95%置信区间-178.8 至-11.2)。
新手学生通过集中式和分布式培训均达到了 CAIS 使用的准确性基准,而在分布式组中存在更高准确性的强烈但略有非显著性趋势。在不同天的分布式格式中接受培训的学生表现更快。试验在泰国临床试验注册中心注册:https://www.thaiclinicaltrials.org/show/TCTR20230109002。本临床试验在招募和随机分组之前未进行注册。