Estación de Viticultura e Enoloxía de Galicia (EVEGA-AGACAL), Ponte San Clodio s/n, 32428 Leiro, Ourense, Spain.
Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2023 Jan 4;15(1):1. doi: 10.31083/j.fbe1501001.
The vineyard is a great reservoir of autochthonous yeast strains whose composition is defined by different regional (edaphology, orography or climatology) and anthropological factors (cultivation systems or cultural practices). Most of this yeast diversity corresponds to non- strains, some of which have potential use in winemaking.
The oenological potential of 29 different native non- strains belonging to 4 species (, , and spp.) was evaluated, using the autochthonous XG3 strain as a control. Microfermentations with pure culture of each strain were performed in duplicate and the basic parameters and major volatiles of wines were analysed following official methodology. The best strain within each species was selected using a quantification matrix including the relevant oenological characteristics.
The fermentative ability of non- was lower than in all cases, but with differences among species. and showed higher fermentation rates than , whereas spp. presented a low fermentative power. At chemical level all non- strains reduced the alcoholic content, the higher alcohols and the volatile acidity of wines and increased the content of glycerol, with differences among strains within a given species. and increased the total acidity of wines. The latter and spp. strains produced lactic acid, which decreased the wine pH in the case of . According to their oenological traits the best rated strains of each species were Lt93, Td315, Mf278 and Sb474. In addition, the data obtained in pure fermentations were correlated to those chemical and aromatic compounds obtained with these non- strains in sequential fermentations.
Autochthonous strains of non- yeast species contribute distinctive chemical characteristics to the wines. The correlations observed between wines fermented with the different non- indigenous strains in pure and sequential fermentations suggest that their contribution to wine properties remains stable regardless of must composition or winemaking techniques.
葡萄园是本土酵母菌株的巨大资源库,其组成受不同地区(土壤学、地形学或气候学)和人类学因素(栽培系统或文化实践)的影响。这些酵母多样性中的大多数对应于非酿酒酵母菌株,其中一些具有在酿酒中的潜在用途。
评估了属于 4 个种(、、和 spp.)的 29 种不同的本土非酿酒酵母菌株的酿造潜力,以本地的 XG3 菌株作为对照。对每种菌株的纯培养物进行了重复微发酵,并按照官方方法分析了葡萄酒的基本参数和主要挥发性物质。使用包括相关酿造特征的定量矩阵,从每个种中选择最佳菌株。
在所有情况下,非酿酒酵母的发酵能力均低于酿酒酵母,但不同种之间存在差异。和显示出比更高的发酵速度,而 spp.则表现出较低的发酵能力。在化学水平上,所有非酿酒酵母菌株均降低了葡萄酒的酒精含量、高级醇和挥发性酸度,并增加了甘油含量,不同种内的菌株之间存在差异。和增加了葡萄酒的总酸度。后者和 spp.菌株产生了乳酸,这降低了的 pH 值。根据其酿造特征,每个种中评分最高的菌株分别为 Lt93、Td315、Mf278 和 Sb474。此外,在纯发酵中获得的数据与这些非酿酒酵母菌株在连续发酵中获得的化学和芳香化合物数据相关。
非酿酒酵母种的本土菌株为葡萄酒赋予了独特的化学特征。在纯发酵和连续发酵中用不同的非本土菌株发酵的葡萄酒之间观察到的相关性表明,无论葡萄汁组成或酿酒技术如何,它们对葡萄酒特性的贡献仍然稳定。