• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类和人工智能在法医身体特征推断中的性能比较分析。

A comparative analysis of human and AI performance in forensic estimation of physical attributes.

机构信息

School of Information, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 23;13(1):4784. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31821-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-023-31821-3
PMID:36959267
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10036317/
Abstract

Human errors in criminal investigations have previously led to devastating miscarriages of justice. For example, flaws in forensic identification based on physical or photographic evidence are notoriously unreliable. The criminal justice system has, therefore, started to turn to artificial intelligence (AI) to improve the reliability and fairness of forensic identification. So as not to repeat history, it is critical to evaluate the appropriateness of deploying these new AI forensic tools. We assess the feasibility of measuring basic physical attributes in a photo using a state-of-the-art AI system, and compare performance with human experts and non-experts. Our results raise concerns as to the use of current AI-based forensic identification.

摘要

在刑事调查中,人为错误曾导致严重的司法误判。例如,基于物理或照片证据的法医鉴定存在缺陷,这是众所周知的不可靠。因此,刑事司法系统已开始转向人工智能(AI)以提高法医鉴定的可靠性和公正性。为了避免重蹈覆辙,评估部署这些新的 AI 法医工具的适当性至关重要。我们评估了使用最先进的 AI 系统在照片中测量基本身体属性的可行性,并将性能与人专家和非专家进行了比较。我们的结果对当前基于 AI 的法医鉴定的使用提出了质疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f0/10036317/4fb047658e1a/41598_2023_31821_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f0/10036317/b100226de7f0/41598_2023_31821_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f0/10036317/4fb047658e1a/41598_2023_31821_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f0/10036317/b100226de7f0/41598_2023_31821_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/56f0/10036317/4fb047658e1a/41598_2023_31821_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis of human and AI performance in forensic estimation of physical attributes.人类和人工智能在法医身体特征推断中的性能比较分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 23;13(1):4784. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31821-3.
2
Artificial intelligence for detecting keratoconus.人工智能在圆锥角膜检测中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD014911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014911.pub2.
3
Risk of thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19 who are using hormonal contraception.COVID-19 患者使用激素避孕的血栓栓塞风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 9;1(1):CD014908. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014908.pub2.
4
AI-based Hepatic Steatosis Detection and Integrated Hepatic Assessment from Cardiac CT Attenuation Scans Enhances All-cause Mortality Risk Stratification: A Multi-center Study.基于人工智能的心脏CT衰减扫描检测肝脂肪变性及综合肝脏评估可增强全因死亡风险分层:一项多中心研究
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.09.25329157. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.09.25329157.
5
Perspectives of Health Care Professionals on the Use of AI to Support Clinical Decision-Making in the Management of Multiple Long-Term Conditions: Interview Study.医疗保健专业人员对使用人工智能支持多种慢性病管理中临床决策的看法:访谈研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 4;27:e71980. doi: 10.2196/71980.
6
Applications of artificial intelligence in forensic sciences: Current potential benefits, limitations and perspectives.人工智能在法医学中的应用:当前的潜在益处、局限性及展望。
Int J Legal Med. 2023 Mar;137(2):445-458. doi: 10.1007/s00414-022-02928-5. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
7
Formative research to optimize pre-eclampsia risk-screening and prevention (PEARLS): study protocol.优化子痫前期风险筛查与预防的形成性研究(PEARLS):研究方案
Reprod Health. 2025 Mar 24;22(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12978-025-01980-9.
8
Health Care Professionals' Experience of Using AI: Systematic Review With Narrative Synthesis.医疗保健专业人员使用人工智能的体验:系统评价与叙事综合。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 30;26:e55766. doi: 10.2196/55766.
9
Trust, Trustworthiness, and the Future of Medical AI: Outcomes of an Interdisciplinary Expert Workshop.信任、可信度与医学人工智能的未来:跨学科专家研讨会成果
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 2;27:e71236. doi: 10.2196/71236.
10
Improving reliability of movement assessment in Parkinson's disease using computer vision-based automated severity estimation.利用基于计算机视觉的自动严重程度估计提高帕金森病运动评估的可靠性。
J Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Mar;15(2):349-360. doi: 10.1177/1877718X241312605. Epub 2025 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Human identification through 3D images: 
a comparative method based on common dental morphological traits.通过三维图像进行身份识别:一种基于常见牙齿形态特征的比较方法。
J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2025 Apr 30;43(1):33-43. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.15332195.
2
Science, evidence, law, and justice.科学、证据、法律和正义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Oct 10;120(41):e2312529120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2312529120. Epub 2023 Oct 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias.专家决策中的认知和人为因素:六个谬论和八个偏见来源。
Anal Chem. 2020 Jun 16;92(12):7998-8004. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
2
Automated face recognition in forensic science: Review and perspectives.自动人脸识别在法医学中的应用:综述与展望。
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Feb;307:110124. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.110124. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
3
The accuracy, fairness, and limits of predicting recidivism.预测累犯的准确性、公正性和局限性。
Sci Adv. 2018 Jan 17;4(1):eaao5580. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5580. eCollection 2018 Jan.
4
Are normal-weight Americans over-fat?正常体重的美国人是否超重?
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010 Nov;18(11):2067-8. doi: 10.1038/oby.2010.103.
5
Change in spine height measurements following sustained mid-range and end-range flexion of the lumbar spine.腰椎持续中范围和终范围屈伸后脊柱高度测量的变化。
Appl Ergon. 2011 Jan;42(2):331-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Sep 15.