• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高在家中去世的几率:使姑息治疗成为可能的全科医生的角色、任务和方法:定性文献的系统评价。

Increasing the chance of dying at home: roles, tasks and approaches of general practitioners enabling palliative care: a systematic review of qualitative literature.

机构信息

The Research Unit for General Practice and Section for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Palliative Care Unit, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 23;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02038-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12875-023-02038-0
PMID:36959553
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10035229/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many elderly people wish to die at home but end up dying at the hospital. If the patient wishes to die at home, palliative care provided by General Practitioners (GPs) may increase the chance of dying at home, however, there is a lack of knowledge on how GPs should provide palliative care. We aimed to identify roles, tasks and approaches of GPs enabling palliative care, by exploring the experiences of GPs, other healthcare professionals, patients, and relatives through a systematic review of the qualitative literature.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and CINAHL in March 2022. Thematic analysis was used for synthesizing the results.

RESULTS

Four thousand five hundred sixty three unique records were retrieved, and 12 studies were included for review. Of these, ten were interview or focus group studies and two were survey studies with additional open-ended questions. Only qualitative findings from the studies were used in synthesizing the results. Thematic analysis produced four main themes describing the roles, tasks and approaches of GPs enabling palliative care to increase the chance for patients to die at home. GPs can support patients in the final phases of life by applying a holistic, patient-centred, and proactive approach to palliative care and by having sufficient education and training. Furthermore, the palliative care consultation should include symptom management, handling psychosocial and spiritual needs, maintaining a fragile balance, and proper communication with the patient. Lastly, GPs must address several palliative care elements surrounding the consultation including initiating the palliative care, being available, being the team coordinator/collaborator, providing continuous care and having sufficient knowledge about the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

The roles, tasks and approaches of the GPs enabling palliative care include being aware of elements in the palliative care consultation and elements surrounding the consultation and by having sufficient education and training and a broad, proactive, and patient-centred approach.

摘要

背景

许多老年人希望在家中离世,但最终却在医院去世。如果患者希望在家中离世,全科医生(GP)提供的姑息治疗可能会增加在家中离世的机会,然而,对于 GP 应该如何提供姑息治疗,人们知之甚少。我们旨在通过系统回顾定性文献,确定 GP 提供姑息治疗的角色、任务和方法,通过探索 GP、其他医疗保健专业人员、患者和亲属的经验。

方法

我们于 2022 年 3 月在 PubMed、EMBASE、PsycINFO、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 中进行了检索。使用主题分析对结果进行综合。

结果

共检索到 4563 条独特记录,纳入了 12 项研究进行综述。其中,10 项为访谈或焦点小组研究,2 项为调查研究,并附有开放性问题。仅使用研究中的定性发现来综合结果。主题分析产生了四个主要主题,描述了 GP 提供姑息治疗以增加患者在家中离世机会的角色、任务和方法。GP 可以通过对姑息治疗采取整体、以患者为中心、主动的方法,并接受充分的教育和培训,来支持生命末期的患者。此外,姑息治疗咨询应包括症状管理、处理心理社会和精神需求、维持脆弱的平衡以及与患者进行适当的沟通。最后,GP 必须解决姑息治疗咨询中涉及的几个方面,包括启动姑息治疗、随时待命、担任团队协调员/合作者、提供持续护理以及对患者有足够的了解。

结论

GP 提供姑息治疗的角色、任务和方法包括了解姑息治疗咨询中的各个方面和咨询周围的各个方面,接受充分的教育和培训,采取广泛、主动和以患者为中心的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c064/10035229/23f8e25dabf7/12875_2023_2038_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c064/10035229/69eadb07bf13/12875_2023_2038_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c064/10035229/23f8e25dabf7/12875_2023_2038_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c064/10035229/69eadb07bf13/12875_2023_2038_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c064/10035229/23f8e25dabf7/12875_2023_2038_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Increasing the chance of dying at home: roles, tasks and approaches of general practitioners enabling palliative care: a systematic review of qualitative literature.提高在家中去世的几率:使姑息治疗成为可能的全科医生的角色、任务和方法:定性文献的系统评价。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 23;24(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02038-0.
2
"It is not the fading candle that one expects": general practitioners' perspectives on life-preserving versus "letting go" decision-making in end-of-life home care.“人们所期待的并非那逐渐熄灭的蜡烛”:全科医生对临终家庭护理中维持生命与“放手”决策的看法。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(4):233-42. doi: 10.3109/02813432.2015.1118837. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
3
Belgian general practitioners' perspectives on the use of palliative sedation in end-of-life home care: a qualitative study.比利时全科医生对临终家庭护理中使用姑息性镇静的看法:一项定性研究。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Jun;47(6):1054-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.06.016. Epub 2013 Oct 2.
4
Finding their place - general practitioners' experiences with palliative care-a Norwegian qualitative study.寻找自己的位置 - 全科医生在姑息治疗方面的经验-挪威的一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Jul 12;21(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01015-1.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
Patient-centeredness to anticipate and organize an end-of-life project for patients receiving at-home palliative care: a phenomenological study.以患者为中心,为接受居家姑息治疗的患者预先规划并组织临终项目:一项现象学研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2017 Feb 23;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0602-8.
7
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of hospital-based specialist palliative care for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.针对患有晚期疾病的成年人及其护理人员的医院专科姑息治疗的有效性和成本效益。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Sep 30;9(9):CD012780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012780.pub2.
8
Reasons for and Frequency of End-of-Life Hospital Admissions: General Practitioners' Perspective on Reducing End-of-Life Hospital Referrals.临终前住院的原因和频率:全科医生对减少临终前转院的看法。
J Palliat Med. 2018 Aug;21(8):1122-1130. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0489. Epub 2018 May 4.
9
Providing palliative care for cancer patients: the views and exposure of community general practitioners and district nurses in Japan.为癌症患者提供姑息治疗:日本社区全科医生和地区护士的观点和经历。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Jan;43(1):59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.03.012. Epub 2011 Jun 23.
10
Experiences, challenges and perspectives for ensuring end-of-life patient care: A national online survey with general practitioners in Germany.确保终末期患者护理的经验、挑战和观点:德国全科医生的全国在线调查。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 27;16(7):e0254056. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254056. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
The Practices of Portuguese Primary Health Care Professionals in Palliative Care Access and Referral: A Focus Group Study.葡萄牙初级卫生保健专业人员在姑息治疗准入和转诊方面的实践:一项焦点小组研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 1;13(13):1576. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131576.
2
The instrumental value of advance directives: lesson learned from the COVID-19 pandemic for policymaking.预先指示的工具性价值:从新冠疫情中汲取的政策制定经验教训。
Res Health Serv Reg. 2025 Feb 5;4(1):1. doi: 10.1007/s43999-025-00060-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Advance care planning conversations in primary care: a quality improvement project using the Serious Illness Care Program.初级保健中的预先护理计划对话:使用严重疾病护理计划进行的质量改进项目。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Jul 30;20(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00817-z.
2
Engaging Family Physicians in the Provision of Palliative and End-of-Life Care: Can We Do Better?让家庭医生参与提供姑息治疗和临终关怀:我们能否做得更好?
Palliat Med Rep. 2021 Jul 16;2(1):207-211. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2021.0021. eCollection 2021.
3
Family Physicians' Perspectives on Their Role in Palliative Care: A Double Focus Group in Portugal.
家庭医生对其在姑息治疗中角色的看法:葡萄牙的双焦点小组研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 7;18(14):7282. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147282.
4
Advance care planning in Dutch primary care: a pre/post-implementation study.荷兰初级医疗保健中的预先护理计划:一项实施前后研究。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2021 Mar 30;12(e3):e358-65. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002762.
5
Real-world ethics in palliative care: A systematic review of the ethical challenges reported by specialist palliative care practitioners in their clinical practice.姑息治疗中的现实世界伦理:对姑息治疗专科从业者在临床实践中报告的伦理挑战的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;35(2):315-334. doi: 10.1177/0269216320974277. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
6
GPs' perspective on End-of-Life Care - an evaluation based on the German version of the General Practice End of Life Care Index.全科医生对临终关怀的看法 - 基于一般实践临终关怀指数德国版的评估。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Nov 16;18:Doc10. doi: 10.3205/000286. eCollection 2020.
7
Effects of an Integrated Palliative Care Pathway: More Proactive GPs, Well Timed, and Less Acute Care: A Clustered, Partially Controlled Before-After Study.综合姑息治疗路径的效果:更积极的全科医生、更及时的治疗、更少的急性治疗:一项聚类、部分对照的前后研究。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Feb;22(2):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
8
What do positive and negative experiences of patients, relatives, general practitioners, medical assistants, and nurses tell us about barriers and supporting factors in outpatient palliative care? A critical incident interview study.患者、家属、全科医生、医疗助理和护士的积极和消极体验告诉我们什么是门诊姑息治疗中的障碍和支持因素?一项关键事件访谈研究。
Ger Med Sci. 2020 Sep 18;18:Doc08. doi: 10.3205/000284. eCollection 2020.
9
How do physicians and nurses in family practice describe their care for patients with progressive life-limiting illness? A qualitative study of a 'palliative approach'.家庭医疗中的医生和护士如何描述他们对患有进行性生命受限疾病患者的护理?一项关于“姑息治疗方法”的定性研究。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 Jul 1;20:e95. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000252.
10
General Practitioners' Perspectives on General and Specialized Palliative Home Care in North Rhine, Germany: An Explorative Focus Group Study.德国北莱茵地区全科医生对一般和专科姑息家庭护理的看法:一项探索性焦点小组研究
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2021 Jan;38(1):32-38. doi: 10.1177/1049909120920541. Epub 2020 Apr 28.