Khan Adil Ahmed, Gupta Pramod Kumar, Baranwal Arun Kumar, Jayashree Muralidharan, Sahoo Tanushree
Department of Neonatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Department of Biostatistics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar;27(3):212-221. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24424.
The multiparameter monitor (MPM) is replacing mercury column sphygmomanometers (MCS) in acute care settings. However, data on the former's accuracy in critically ill children are scarce and mostly extrapolated from adults. We compared non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) measurements by MPMs with MCS in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Adequately sedated and hemodynamically stabilized children (age, 1-144 months) were prospectively enrolled.
Three NIBP measurements were obtained from MCS (Diamond®, India) and MPM (Intellivue MX800® or Ultraview SL®) in rapid succession in the upper limb resting in supine position. Respective three measurements were averaged to obtain a paired set of NIBP readings, one each from MCS and MPM. Such readings were obtained thrice a day. NIBP readings were then compared, and agreement was assessed.
From 39 children [median age (IQR), 30 (10-72) months], 1,690 sets of NIBP readings were obtained. A-third of readings were from infants and children >96 months, while 383 (22.6%) readings were from patients on inotropes. Multiparameter monitors gave significantly higher NIBP readings compared to MCS [median systolic blood pressure (SBP), 6.5 (6.4-6.7 mm Hg); diastolic blood pressure (DBP), 4.5 (4.3-4.6 mm Hg); mean arterial pressure (MAP), 5.3 (5.1-5.4 mm Hg); < 0.05]. It was consistent across age, gender, and critical care characteristics. Multiparameter monitors overestimated SBP in 80% of readings beyond the maximal clinically acceptable difference (MCAD).
Non-invasive blood pressure readings from MCS and MPMs are not interchangeable; SBP was 6-7 mm Hg higher with the latter. Overestimation beyond MCAD was overwhelming. Caution is required while classifying systolic hypotension with MPMs. Confirmation with auscultatory methods is advisable. More studies are required to evaluate currently available MPMs in different pediatric age groups.
Khan AA, Gupta PK, Baranwal AK, Jayashree M, Sahoo T. Comparison of Blood Pressure Measurements by Currently Available Multiparameter Monitors and Mercury Column Sphygmomanometer in Patients Admitted in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(3):212-221.
在急症护理环境中,多参数监护仪(MPM)正在取代汞柱式血压计(MCS)。然而,关于前者在危重症儿童中准确性的数据稀缺,且大多是从成人数据外推而来。我们在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)比较了MPM与MCS测量无创血压(NIBP)的情况。
前瞻性纳入了充分镇静且血流动力学稳定的儿童(年龄1至144个月)。
在上肢处于仰卧位休息状态时,快速连续从MCS(印度Diamond®)和MPM(Intellivue MX800®或Ultraview SL®)获取三次NIBP测量值。将各自的三次测量值平均,以获得一组配对的NIBP读数,分别来自MCS和MPM。每天进行三次这样的读数获取。然后比较NIBP读数,并评估一致性。
从39名儿童[中位年龄(IQR),30(10 - 72)个月]中获得了1690组NIBP读数。三分之一的读数来自婴儿和大于96个月的儿童,而383(22.6%)次读数来自使用血管活性药物的患者。与MCS相比,多参数监护仪给出的NIBP读数显著更高[中位收缩压(SBP),6.5(6.4 - 6.7毫米汞柱);舒张压(DBP),4.5(4.3 - 4.6毫米汞柱);平均动脉压(MAP),5.3(5.1 - 5.4毫米汞柱);P < 0.05]。这在年龄、性别和重症监护特征方面是一致的。在超过最大临床可接受差异(MCAD)的读数中,多参数监护仪高估SBP的情况占80%。
MCS和MPM的无创血压读数不可互换;后者的SBP高出6至7毫米汞柱。超过MCAD的高估情况非常普遍。使用MPM对收缩期低血压进行分类时需谨慎。建议用听诊法进行确认。需要更多研究来评估不同儿科年龄组中现有的MPM。
Khan AA, Gupta PK, Baranwal AK, Jayashree M, Sahoo T. 儿科重症监护病房患者中现有多参数监护仪与汞柱式血压计血压测量的比较。《印度重症医学杂志》2023;27(3):212 - 221。