Patange Simona, D Miller Sierra, D Maragh Samantha
Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, Materials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Synth Biol (Oxf). 2023 Mar 10;8(1):ysad003. doi: 10.1093/synbio/ysad003. eCollection 2023.
The presence and impact of variability in cells as the source material for genome engineering are important to consider for the design, execution and interpretation of outcomes of a genome-engineering process. Variability may be present at the genotype and phenotype level, yet the impact of these sources of variability on a genome-engineering experiment may not be regularly considered by researchers. In this perspective, we use clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) genome editing of mammalian cells to provide examples of how variation within or across cell samples may mislead a researcher in their expectations about the cells they are engineering. Furthermore, we highlight the need for understanding the baseline cell genotype and phenotype to appropriately understand the starting cell material and interpret and attribute the impact of engineering on cells. We emphasize that heterogeneity within a cell pool and the inherent variability in the cellular materials used for genome engineering are complex, but of high value to characterize and account for where possible, to move toward the potential of generating desired and predictable engineered products. Provided is a framework cause-and-effect diagram for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing toward identifying and mitigating potential sources of variability. We encourage researchers to consider the variability of source materials and undertake strategies, which may include those described here, for detecting, attributing and minimizing additional sources of variability where possible toward the aim of fostering greater reliability, confidence and reproducibility in genome-engineering studies. .
细胞作为基因组工程的原材料,其变异性的存在及影响对于基因组工程过程的设计、实施和结果解读而言,是重要的考量因素。变异性可能存在于基因型和表型层面,但研究人员可能并不经常考虑这些变异性来源对基因组工程实验的影响。从这个角度出发,我们利用对哺乳动物细胞进行的成簇规律间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR)/CRISPR相关蛋白(Cas)基因组编辑,来举例说明细胞样本内部或之间的变异如何在研究人员对其正在改造的细胞的预期方面产生误导。此外,我们强调需要了解基线细胞基因型和表型,以便恰当地理解起始细胞材料,并解读和归因工程对细胞的影响。我们强调,细胞群体内的异质性以及用于基因组工程的细胞材料的固有变异性是复杂的,但尽可能对其进行表征和考虑具有很高的价值,以便朝着生成所需且可预测的工程产品的潜力迈进。本文提供了一个用于CRISPR/Cas9基因组编辑的因果关系图,以识别和减轻潜在的变异性来源。我们鼓励研究人员考虑原材料的变异性,并采取可能包括本文所述策略在内的策略,尽可能检测、归因和最小化额外的变异性来源,以提高基因组工程研究的可靠性、可信度和可重复性。