• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Variability in genome-engineering source materials: consider your starting point.基因组编辑原材料的变异性:考虑你的起始点。
Synth Biol (Oxf). 2023 Mar 10;8(1):ysad003. doi: 10.1093/synbio/ysad003. eCollection 2023.
2
CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome engineering of CHO cell factories: Application and perspectives.CRISPR/Cas9介导的中国仓鼠卵巢细胞工厂基因组工程:应用与展望
Biotechnol J. 2015 Jul;10(7):979-94. doi: 10.1002/biot.201500082. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
3
Precision genome editing in plants: state-of-the-art in CRISPR/Cas9-based genome engineering.植物的精确基因组编辑:基于 CRISPR/Cas9 的基因组工程的最新进展。
BMC Plant Biol. 2020 May 25;20(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02385-5.
4
Challenges of in vitro genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 and possible solutions: A review.利用 CRISPR/Cas9 进行体外基因组编辑的挑战及可能的解决方案:综述。
Gene. 2020 Aug 30;753:144813. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.144813. Epub 2020 May 26.
5
Genome Editing in Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum N1-4 with the CRISPR-Cas9 System.利用CRISPR-Cas9系统对丙酮丁醇梭菌N1-4进行基因组编辑
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 May 1;83(10). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00233-17. Print 2017 May 15.
6
Recent advances in CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing in Bacillus subtilis.枯草芽孢杆菌中 CRISPR/Cas9 介导的基因组编辑技术的最新进展。
World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018 Sep 29;34(10):153. doi: 10.1007/s11274-018-2537-1.
7
CRISPR-Cas9 system: A new-fangled dawn in gene editing.CRISPR-Cas9 系统:基因编辑的崭新时代。
Life Sci. 2019 Sep 1;232:116636. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116636. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
8
Extending CRISPR-Cas9 Technology from Genome Editing to Transcriptional Engineering in the Genus Clostridium.将CRISPR-Cas9技术从基因组编辑扩展到梭菌属的转录工程
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016 Sep 30;82(20):6109-6119. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02128-16. Print 2016 Oct 15.
9
CRISPR/Cas9 advances engineering of microbial cell factories.CRISPR/Cas9技术推动了微生物细胞工厂的工程改造。
Metab Eng. 2016 Mar;34:44-59. doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.12.003. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
10
CRISPR/Cas genome editing to optimize pharmacologically active plant natural products.CRISPR/Cas 基因组编辑优化具有药理活性的植物天然产物。
Pharmacol Res. 2021 Feb;164:105359. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105359. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing of a swine cell line via electroporation.通过电穿孔对猪细胞系进行CRISPR-Cas9基因组编辑的方案。
STAR Protoc. 2024 Dec 20;5(4):103385. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2024.103385. Epub 2024 Oct 10.
2
Special issue: reproducibility in synthetic biology.特刊:合成生物学中的可重复性
Synth Biol (Oxf). 2023 Nov 16;8(1):ysad015. doi: 10.1093/synbio/ysad015. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The background and legacy of Lewontin's apportionment of human genetic diversity.人类遗传多样性分配的莱文廷背景和遗产。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Jun 6;377(1852):20200406. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0406. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
2
Frequent loss of heterozygosity in CRISPR-Cas9-edited early human embryos.CRISPR-Cas9 编辑的早期人类胚胎中频繁的杂合性丢失。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 1;118(22). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2004832117. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
3
Chromothripsis as an on-target consequence of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing.染色体重排是 CRISPR-Cas9 基因组编辑的一种靶向后果。
Nat Genet. 2021 Jun;53(6):895-905. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00838-7. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
4
Tools for experimental and computational analyses of off-target editing by programmable nucleases.可编程核酸酶脱靶编辑的实验和计算分析工具。
Nat Protoc. 2021 Jan;16(1):10-26. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-00431-y. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
5
Allele-Specific Chromosome Removal after Cas9 Cleavage in Human Embryos.Cas9 酶切后人类胚胎中的等位基因特异性染色体去除。
Cell. 2020 Dec 10;183(6):1650-1664.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.025. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
6
Anticipating and Identifying Collateral Damage in Genome Editing.预测和识别基因编辑中的附带损害
Trends Genet. 2020 Dec;36(12):905-914. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2020.09.011. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
7
CHANGE-seq reveals genetic and epigenetic effects on CRISPR-Cas9 genome-wide activity.CHANGE-seq 揭示了遗传和表观遗传对 CRISPR-Cas9 全基因组活性的影响。
Nat Biotechnol. 2020 Nov;38(11):1317-1327. doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0555-7. Epub 2020 Jun 15.
8
CRISPR/Cas9 increases mitotic gene conversion in human cells.CRISPR/Cas9 增加了人类细胞有丝分裂中的基因转换。
Gene Ther. 2020 Jun;27(6):281-296. doi: 10.1038/s41434-020-0126-z. Epub 2020 Feb 4.
9
Pre-validation of Gene Editing by CRISPR/Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein.CRISPR/Cas9核糖核蛋白对基因编辑的预验证
Avicenna J Med Biotechnol. 2019 Jul-Sep;11(3):259-263.
10
Interlaboratory study to validate a STR profiling method for intraspecies identification of mouse cell lines.实验室间研究验证用于鉴定小鼠细胞系种内鉴定的 STR 分析方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 20;14(6):e0218412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218412. eCollection 2019.

基因组编辑原材料的变异性:考虑你的起始点。

Variability in genome-engineering source materials: consider your starting point.

作者信息

Patange Simona, D Miller Sierra, D Maragh Samantha

机构信息

Biosystems and Biomaterials Division, Materials Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

出版信息

Synth Biol (Oxf). 2023 Mar 10;8(1):ysad003. doi: 10.1093/synbio/ysad003. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1093/synbio/ysad003
PMID:36960426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10029982/
Abstract

The presence and impact of variability in cells as the source material for genome engineering are important to consider for the design, execution and interpretation of outcomes of a genome-engineering process. Variability may be present at the genotype and phenotype level, yet the impact of these sources of variability on a genome-engineering experiment may not be regularly considered by researchers. In this perspective, we use clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein (Cas) genome editing of mammalian cells to provide examples of how variation within or across cell samples may mislead a researcher in their expectations about the cells they are engineering. Furthermore, we highlight the need for understanding the baseline cell genotype and phenotype to appropriately understand the starting cell material and interpret and attribute the impact of engineering on cells. We emphasize that heterogeneity within a cell pool and the inherent variability in the cellular materials used for genome engineering are complex, but of high value to characterize and account for where possible, to move toward the potential of generating desired and predictable engineered products. Provided is a framework cause-and-effect diagram for CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing toward identifying and mitigating potential sources of variability. We encourage researchers to consider the variability of source materials and undertake strategies, which may include those described here, for detecting, attributing and minimizing additional sources of variability where possible toward the aim of fostering greater reliability, confidence and reproducibility in genome-engineering studies. .

摘要

细胞作为基因组工程的原材料,其变异性的存在及影响对于基因组工程过程的设计、实施和结果解读而言,是重要的考量因素。变异性可能存在于基因型和表型层面,但研究人员可能并不经常考虑这些变异性来源对基因组工程实验的影响。从这个角度出发,我们利用对哺乳动物细胞进行的成簇规律间隔短回文重复序列(CRISPR)/CRISPR相关蛋白(Cas)基因组编辑,来举例说明细胞样本内部或之间的变异如何在研究人员对其正在改造的细胞的预期方面产生误导。此外,我们强调需要了解基线细胞基因型和表型,以便恰当地理解起始细胞材料,并解读和归因工程对细胞的影响。我们强调,细胞群体内的异质性以及用于基因组工程的细胞材料的固有变异性是复杂的,但尽可能对其进行表征和考虑具有很高的价值,以便朝着生成所需且可预测的工程产品的潜力迈进。本文提供了一个用于CRISPR/Cas9基因组编辑的因果关系图,以识别和减轻潜在的变异性来源。我们鼓励研究人员考虑原材料的变异性,并采取可能包括本文所述策略在内的策略,尽可能检测、归因和最小化额外的变异性来源,以提高基因组工程研究的可靠性、可信度和可重复性。