科学界中人工智能生成的研究论文造假与抄袭现象。
AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community.
作者信息
Elali Faisal R, Rachid Leena N
机构信息
State University of New York Downstate Health Sciences University, College of Medicine, New York 11203, NY, USA.
Loyola University Medical Center, College of Medicine, Maywood, IL, USA.
出版信息
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Mar 10;4(3):100706. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100706.
Abstract
Fabricating research within the scientific community has consequences for one's credibility and undermines honest authors. We demonstrate the feasibility of fabricating research using an AI-based language model chatbot. Human detection versus AI detection will be compared to determine accuracy in identifying fabricated works. The risks of utilizing AI-generated research works will be underscored and reasons for falsifying research will be highlighted.
摘要
在科学界编造研究对个人信誉有影响，也会损害诚实的作者。我们展示了使用基于人工智能的语言模型聊天机器人编造研究的可行性。将比较人工检测与人工智能检测，以确定识别编造作品的准确性。将强调使用人工智能生成的研究作品的风险，并突出伪造研究的原因。
相似文献
1
AI-generated research paper fabrication and plagiarism in the scientific community.科学界中人工智能生成的研究论文造假与抄袭现象。
Patterns (N Y). 2023 Mar 10;4(3):100706. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100706.
2
What is the rate of text generated by artificial intelligence over a year of publication in Orthopedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research? Analysis of 425 articles before versus after the launch of ChatGPT in November 2022.在《矫形外科与创伤学：手术与研究》杂志上发表的人工智能文本在一年时间内的生成率是多少？分析 2022 年 11 月 ChatGPT 发布前后的 425 篇文章。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Dec;109(8):103694. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103694. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
3
Assessing the Reproducibility of the Structured Abstracts Generated by ChatGPT and Bard Compared to Human-Written Abstracts in the Field of Spine Surgery: Comparative Analysis.评估 ChatGPT 和 Bard 生成的结构化摘要与脊柱外科领域人类撰写的摘要在可重复性方面的比较：对比分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 26;26:e52001. doi: 10.2196/52001.
4
Quality and correctness of AI-generated versus human-written abstracts in psychiatric research papers.人工智能生成与人类撰写的精神科研究论文摘要的质量和准确性。
Psychiatry Res. 2024 Nov;341:116145. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.116145. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
5
Evaluation of the impact of large language learning models on articles submitted to Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR): A significant increase in the use of artificial intelligence in 2023.评估大型语言模型对《矫形外科与创伤学：研究与实践》（OTSR）投稿文章的影响：2023 年人工智能的使用显著增加。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023 Dec;109(8):103720. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103720. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
6
Utilizing ChatGPT in clinical research related to anesthesiology: a comprehensive review of opportunities and limitations.在麻醉学相关临床研究中使用ChatGPT：机遇与局限的全面综述
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2023 Jul;18(3):244-251. doi: 10.17085/apm.23056. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
7
Editorial: Generative artificial intelligence as a plagiarism problem.社论：生成式人工智能作为一种剽窃问题。
Biol Psychol. 2023 Jul;181:108621. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108621. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
8
ChatGPT: ethical concerns and challenges in academics and research.ChatGPT：学术和研究中的伦理问题与挑战。
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023 Sep 30;17(9):1292-1299. doi: 10.3855/jidc.18738.
9
Artificial Intelligence Can Generate Fraudulent but Authentic-Looking Scientific Medical Articles: Pandora's Box Has Been Opened.人工智能可以生成虚假但看起来真实的科学医学文章：潘多拉的盒子已经被打开。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 31;25:e46924. doi: 10.2196/46924.
10
Comparisons of Quality, Correctness, and Similarity Between ChatGPT-Generated and Human-Written Abstracts for Basic Research: Cross-Sectional Study.ChatGPT 生成的和人工撰写的基础研究摘要在质量、正确性和相似性方面的比较：横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Dec 25;25:e51229. doi: 10.2196/51229.
引用本文的文献
1
Attitudes and perceptions of biomedical journal editors in chief towards the use of artificial intelligence chatbots in the scholarly publishing process: a cross-sectional survey.生物医学期刊主编对学术出版过程中使用人工智能聊天机器人的态度和看法：一项横断面调查
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2025 Sep 8;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41073-025-00178-8.
2
Artificial Intelligence Use in Medical Education: Best Practices and Future Directions.人工智能在医学教育中的应用：最佳实践与未来方向。
Curr Urol Rep. 2025 May 29;26(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s11934-025-01277-1.
3
Readability of Orthopaedic Patient Educational Material: An artificial intelligence application.骨科患者教育材料的可读性：一项人工智能应用。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Mar 12;64:102971. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102971. eCollection 2025 May.
4
Comparative Analysis of Information Quality in Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology: Clinicians, Residents, and Large Language Models.儿科耳鼻咽喉科学中信息质量的比较分析：临床医生、住院医师和大语言模型
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jul;173(1):228-236. doi: 10.1002/ohn.1225. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
5
AI detectors are poor western blot classifiers: a study of accuracy and predictive values.人工智能检测工具在蛋白质印迹法分类方面表现不佳：准确性和预测价值研究
PeerJ. 2025 Feb 20;13:e18988. doi: 10.7717/peerj.18988. eCollection 2025.
6
Research on key factors influencing Chinese designers' use of AIGC: An extension based on TAM and TRI.影响中国设计师使用AIGC的关键因素研究：基于技术接受模型和技术就绪度指数的扩展
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 19;20(2):e0314306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314306. eCollection 2025.
7
A conceptual ethical framework to preserve natural human presence in the use of AI systems in education.一个在教育领域使用人工智能系统时维护人类自然存在的概念性伦理框架。
Front Artif Intell. 2025 Jan 21;7:1377938. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1377938. eCollection 2024.
8
Use of generative large language models for patient education on common surgical conditions: a comparative analysis between ChatGPT and Google Gemini.使用生成式大语言模型对常见外科疾病患者进行教育：ChatGPT与谷歌Gemini的比较分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan 15. doi: 10.1007/s13304-025-02074-8.
9
Navigating Artificial Intelligence in Scientific Manuscript Writing: Tips and Traps.科学论文写作中的人工智能应用指南：技巧与陷阱
Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2025 Jan 9;35(Suppl 1):S178-S186. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1800801. eCollection 2025 Jan.
10
Reader's digest version of scientific writing: comparative evaluation of summarization capacity between large language models and medical students in analyzing scientific writing in sleep medicine.科学写作的读者文摘版：大型语言模型与医学生在分析睡眠医学科学写作方面的总结能力比较评估
Front Artif Intell. 2024 Dec 24;7:1477535. doi: 10.3389/frai.2024.1477535. eCollection 2024.
本文引用的文献
1
Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers.使用检测器和不知情的人类评审员，将ChatGPT生成的科学摘要与真实摘要进行比较。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Apr 26;6(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6.
2
AI-enabled image fraud in scientific publications.科学出版物中利用人工智能的图像造假。
Patterns (N Y). 2022 Jul 8;3(7):100511. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2022.100511.
3
US Medical Student Perspectives on the Impact of a Pass/Fail USMLE Step 1.美国医学生对 USMLE 第 1 阶段通过/不通过制影响的看法。
J Surg Educ. 2022 Mar-Apr;79(2):397-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2021.09.010. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
4
Plagiarism detection and prevention: a primer for researchers.抄袭检测与预防：研究人员入门指南
Reumatologia. 2021;59(3):132-137. doi: 10.5114/reum.2021.105974. Epub 2021 May 13.
5
Plagiarism Detection by Online Solutions.通过在线解决方案进行剽窃检测。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;238:227-230.
6
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.有多少科学家伪造和篡改研究数据？对调查数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
Zotero 插件