Department of Human Development and Quantitative Methodology, University of Maryland, 3304 Benjamin Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA.
Biol Psychol. 2023 Jul;181:108621. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108621. Epub 2023 Jun 24.
There is increasing concern and consternation about generative artificial intelligence (AI) programs and its potential impact on academia. This editorial addresses the potential impact of such programs on scientific publishing as it relates to the journal Biological Psychology. Using chatGPT as an example, it makes the case that a prime concern is its implications for facilitating plagiarism. It briefly outlines what is known about the algorithm of the GPT text model, and also the implications of its chatGPT front end, on being able to establish appropriate credit for ideas in text that it outputs. It is concluded that, at least for Biological Psychology, the expectation is that authors will be transparent about AI usage, will declare when AI is the source of an idea, and will redouble efforts to seek out and cite prior claims to ideas in the published literature when AI is involved.
人们对生成式人工智能（AI）程序及其对学术界的潜在影响越来越关注和担忧。本社论讨论了此类程序对与《生物心理学》杂志相关的科学出版的潜在影响。本文以 ChatGPT 为例，提出了人们主要关注的问题是其对促进剽窃的影响。本文简要概述了人们对 GPT 文本模型算法的了解，以及其 ChatGPT 前端在确定其输出文本中思想的适当归属方面的影响。本文得出结论，至少对于《生物心理学》杂志而言，人们期望作者能够对 AI 的使用保持透明，当 AI 是一个想法的来源时，作者应声明这一点，并在涉及 AI 时加倍努力在已发表文献中查找和引用先前对该想法的主张。
