Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
Thyroid. 2023 Jun;33(6):697-704. doi: 10.1089/thy.2022.0534. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
While the diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs) with tall cell features (PTCtcf) is often made for carcinomas with histological features intermediate between classic and tall cell subtypes of PTC (tcPTC), its comparative signature to that of either tcPTC or classic PTC is less clear. The objective of this study was to perform an integrative clinicopathologic and genomic analysis elucidating the spectrum of tcPTC, PTCtcf, and classic PTC. We analyzed all consecutive patients with tcPTC and PTCtcf evaluated at a tertiary academic referral center between 2005 and 2020, as well as a comparative cohort of classic PTC, in a retrospective observational cohort analysis. Clinicopathologic data were compared among the three groups, including progression-free survival (PFS), recurrent/persistent disease, and a negative composite outcome of death, progression, or need for advanced therapy. To specifically understand differences between tcPTC and PTCtcf, targeted next-generation sequencing was performed in a subset of these cohorts. A total of 292 patients were analyzed (81 tcPTC, 65 PTCtcf, 146 classic PTC). Thirteen percent of tcPTC versus 8% of PTCtcf versus 1% of classic PTC had the advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer stage ( = 0.002). Similarly, macroscopic extrathyroidal extension was observed in 38% of tcPTC, 14% of PTCtcf, and 12% of classic PTC ( < 0.001). The 5-year PFS was 76.5%, 81.5%, and 88.3% for tcPTC, PTCtcf, and classic PTC, respectively, while the rates of the negative composite outcome 40.2% for tcPTC, 20.7% for PTCtcf, and 11.2% for classic PTC ( < 0.001). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, the negative composite outcome was independently associated with tcPTC (HR 4.3 [confidence interval 1.1-16.1], = 0.03). tcPTC demonstrated substantially more hotspot promoter mutations than PTCtcf (44% vs. 6%, = 0.012). Our study demonstrates a continuum of disease-specific risk of PTC, pointing at PTCtcf as an intermediate entity between tcPTC and classic PTC. These data provide a more refined understanding of risk at time of presentation, while better elucidating the diversity of genomic drivers.
当诊断出具有高细胞特征的甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)(PTCtcf)时,通常是在经典型和高细胞型 PTC(tcPTC)之间的组织学特征的癌之间做出诊断,而其与 tcPTC 或经典 PTC 相比的特征就不那么清楚了。本研究的目的是通过整合临床病理和基因组分析来阐明 tcPTC、PTCtcf 和经典 PTC 的范围。我们在回顾性观察队列分析中分析了 2005 年至 2020 年间在三级学术转诊中心评估的所有连续患有 tcPTC 和 PTCtcf 的患者,以及具有经典 PTC 的对照队列。在三组之间比较了临床病理数据,包括无进展生存期(PFS)、复发性/持续性疾病以及死亡、进展或需要先进治疗的阴性复合结果。为了专门了解 tcPTC 和 PTCtcf 之间的差异,我们在这些队列的一部分中进行了靶向下一代测序。共分析了 292 名患者(81 名 tcPTC、65 名 PTCtcf、146 名经典 PTC)。tcPTC 的 13%与 PTCtcf 的 8%与经典 PTC 的 1%具有高级美国癌症联合委员会分期(=0.002)。同样,38%的 tcPTC、14%的 PTCtcf 和 12%的经典 PTC 观察到肉眼甲状腺外延伸( <0.001)。tcPTC、PTCtcf 和经典 PTC 的 5 年 PFS 分别为 76.5%、81.5%和 88.3%,而 tcPTC 的阴性复合结果率为 40.2%、PTCtcf 的 20.7%和经典 PTC 的 11.2%( <0.001)。在多变量 Cox 回归分析中,阴性复合结果与 tcPTC 独立相关(HR 4.3 [置信区间 1.1-16.1], =0.03)。tcPTC 显示出比 PTCtcf 更多的热点启动子突变(44%对 6%, =0.012)。我们的研究表明,PTC 具有疾病特异性风险的连续性,指出 PTCtcf 是 tcPTC 和经典 PTC 之间的中间实体。这些数据提供了在发病时风险的更精细理解,同时更好地阐明了基因组驱动因素的多样性。