Anatomical Pathology, Douglass Hanly Moir Pathology, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2113, Australia.
Discipline of Pathology, Macquarie Medical School, Macquarie University, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Endocr Pathol. 2023 Dec;34(4):461-470. doi: 10.1007/s12022-023-09788-8. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
Tall cell papillary thyroid carcinoma (TC-PTC) is considered adverse histology. However, previous studies are confounded by inconsistent criteria and strong associations with other adverse features. It is therefore still unclear if TC-PTC represents an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis and, if it does, what criteria should be employed for the diagnosis. We retrospectively reviewed 487 PTCs from our institution (where we have historically avoided the prospective diagnosis of TC-PTC) for both the height of tall cells (that is if the cells were two, or three, times as tall as wide) and the percentage of tall cells. On univariate analysis, there was significantly better disease free survival (DFS) in PTCs with no significant tall cell component (< 30%) compared to PTCs with cells two times tall as wide (p = 0.005). The proportion of tall cells (30-50% and > 50%) was significantly associated with DFS (p = 0.012). In a multivariate model including age, size, vascular space invasion, and lymph node metastasis, the current WHO tall cell criteria, met by 7.8% of PTCs, lacked statistical significance for DFS (p = 0.519). However, in the subset of tumours otherwise similar to the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines low-risk category, WHO TC-PTC demonstrated a highly significant reduction in DFS (p = 0.004). In contrast, in intermediate to high-risk tumours, TC-PTC by WHO criteria lacked statistical significance (p = 0.384). We conclude that it may be simplistic to think of tall cell features as being present or absent, as both the height of the cells (two times versus three times) and the percentage of cells that are tall have different clinical significances in different contexts. Most importantly, the primary clinical significance of TC-PTC is restricted to PTCs that are otherwise low risk by ATA guidelines.
高细胞型甲状腺乳头状癌(TC-PTC)被认为是不良组织学特征。然而,以前的研究受到标准不一致和与其他不良特征强烈关联的影响。因此,在多变量分析中,TC-PTC 是否代表独立的预后因素仍不清楚,如果是这样,应该采用什么标准进行诊断。我们回顾性分析了来自我们机构的 487 例 PTC 病例(我们在历史上避免前瞻性诊断 TC-PTC),分析内容包括高细胞的高度(即细胞高度是宽度的两倍或三倍)和高细胞的比例。在单因素分析中,无明显高细胞成分(<30%)的 PTC 患者与细胞高度是宽度两倍的 PTC 患者相比,无病生存率(DFS)显著更好(p=0.005)。高细胞比例(30-50%和>50%)与 DFS 显著相关(p=0.012)。在包括年龄、大小、血管空间侵犯和淋巴结转移的多变量模型中,目前的 WHO 高细胞标准,符合 7.8%的 PTC,在 DFS 方面缺乏统计学意义(p=0.519)。然而,在其他方面类似于美国甲状腺协会(ATA)指南低危组的肿瘤亚组中,WHO TC-PTC 显著降低了 DFS(p=0.004)。相比之下,在中高危肿瘤中,根据 WHO 标准,TC-PTC 缺乏统计学意义(p=0.384)。我们的结论是,将高细胞特征视为存在或不存在可能过于简单,因为细胞的高度(两倍与三倍)和高细胞的比例在不同的背景下具有不同的临床意义。最重要的是,TC-PTC 的主要临床意义仅限于其他方面符合 ATA 指南的低危 PTC。