• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声检测到的复发性流产妊娠产物的特定异常的阵列比较基因组杂交分析

Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Products of Conception in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss for specific anomalies detected by USG.

作者信息

Gajjar Kinjal, Patel Alpesh, Patel Bhikhabhai, Chettiar Shiva, Jhala Devendrasinh

机构信息

K Gajjar, Department of Zoology, Gujarat University, Ahmedabad, India.

A Patel, GeneXplore Diagnostics and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd., Ahmedabad, India.

出版信息

Reprod Fertil. 2023 Mar 1;4(2). doi: 10.1530/RAF-22-0092.

DOI:10.1530/RAF-22-0092
PMID:36961397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10160560/
Abstract

To evaluate the proportion of chromosomal abnormalities in recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) assisted by array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) bright out with higher detection rate, more accuracy, and less sample failure as compared with conventional cytogenetic analysis. In this study, product of conception samples with abnormal USG findings of the fetus and clinical history of RPL were first processed for karyotyping and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization analysis. Normal results given by Karyotype and FISH samples with major anomalies detected by Ultrasound with RPL were divided into six groups and aCGH was performed to detect the gain or loss and copy number variations (CNVs) of a particular gene present in chromosomal segments. Among a total of 300 POC samples, 100 abnormal samples were identified either by karyotype (n=70) or by FISH (n=30). From the remaining 200 samples, 5 showed the presence of maternal cell contamination excluded. aCGH analysis revealed (n=195) that 74 (38%) samples with copy number variations (CNVs) and two samples with variants of unknown clinical significance (VOUS) were clinically associated with the clinical findings and 121(62%) samples showed no change in CNVs. The most frequent CNVs were loss of chromosome regions at 2q33.1, 7q11.21, 15q11.1, 16p11.2, Xp22.33, and Yp11.32. CNVs at arr[GRCh37]7p22.3,p21.2(830852-15124702)×1,7q34q36.3(141464180_158909738)×3, 14.2Mbp deletion of 7p22.3p21.2 (SUN1 gene) and 17.4Mbp duplication of 7q34q36.3 (KCNH2, CNTNAP2, and SHH genes) in one sample, CNVs at arr[GRCh37]8p22.2q22.3 (86326349_105509986)×1, 2.48Mbp deletion of 8p22.2q22.3 (GRHL1 gene) were found in another sample.

摘要

为评估与传统细胞遗传学分析相比,采用比较基因组杂交芯片(aCGH)辅助复发性流产(RPL)时染色体异常的比例,结果显示其检测率更高、准确性更高且样本失败率更低。在本研究中,首先对胎儿超声检查结果异常且有RPL临床病史的妊娠产物样本进行核型分析和荧光原位杂交分析。核型分析和荧光原位杂交结果正常且超声检查发现有主要异常以及有RPL的样本被分为六组,并进行aCGH检测,以检测染色体片段中特定基因的增减和拷贝数变异(CNV)。在总共300份妊娠产物样本中,通过核型分析(n = 70)或荧光原位杂交(n = 30)鉴定出100份异常样本。在其余200份样本中,排除了5份存在母血细胞污染的样本。aCGH分析显示(n = 195),74份(38%)有拷贝数变异(CNV)的样本和2份临床意义不明变异(VOUS)的样本与临床发现相关,121份(62%)样本的CNV无变化。最常见的CNV是2q33.1、7q11.21、15q11.1、16p11.2、Xp22.33和Yp11.32染色体区域的缺失。在一个样本中发现arr[GRCh37]7p22.3,p21.2(830852 - 15124702)×1、7q34q36.3(141464180_158909738)×3、7p22.3p21.2(SUN1基因)14.2Mbp缺失以及7q34q36.3(KCNH2、CNTNAP2和SHH基因)17.4Mbp重复的CNV,在另一个样本中发现arr[GRCh37]8p22.2q22.3(86326349_105509986)×1、8p该文档中未提及的内容,无法准确翻译。22.2q22.3(GRHL1基因)2.48Mbp缺失的CNV。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10160560/0d286f5913c6/RAF-22-0092fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10160560/5afb6d58139d/RAF-22-0092fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10160560/68b3db16e04b/RAF-22-0092fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10160560/0c5a4655cb37/RAF-22-0092fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10160560/0d286f5913c6/RAF-22-0092fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10160560/5afb6d58139d/RAF-22-0092fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10160560/68b3db16e04b/RAF-22-0092fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10160560/0c5a4655cb37/RAF-22-0092fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10160560/0d286f5913c6/RAF-22-0092fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Products of Conception in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss for specific anomalies detected by USG.超声检测到的复发性流产妊娠产物的特定异常的阵列比较基因组杂交分析
Reprod Fertil. 2023 Mar 1;4(2). doi: 10.1530/RAF-22-0092.
2
Spectrum of Cytogenomic Abnormalities Revealed by Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization on Products of Conception Culture Failure and Normal Karyotype Samples.通过对胚胎培养失败和正常核型样本的比较基因组杂交分析,揭示了细胞基因组异常的范围。
J Genet Genomics. 2016 Mar 20;43(3):121-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Feb 13.
3
Array comparative genomic hybridization and fetal congenital heart defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阵列比较基因组杂交与胎儿先天性心脏缺陷:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;45(1):27-35. doi: 10.1002/uog.14695.
4
Detection of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations by array-based comparative genomic hybridization in fetuses with congenital heart disease.应用基于微阵列的比较基因组杂交技术检测先天性心脏病胎儿的亚微观染色体畸变。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;43(4):404-12. doi: 10.1002/uog.13236.
5
Identification of De Novo and Rare Inherited Copy Number Variants in Children with Syndromic Congenital Heart Defects.患有综合征型先天性心脏病儿童中从头和罕见遗传性拷贝数变异的鉴定
Pediatr Cardiol. 2018 Jun;39(5):924-940. doi: 10.1007/s00246-018-1842-7. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
6
New insights in the interpretation of array-CGH: autism spectrum disorder and positive family history for intellectual disability predict the detection of pathogenic variants.阵列比较基因组杂交解读的新见解:自闭症谱系障碍和智力残疾的阳性家族史可预测致病变异的检测。
Ital J Pediatr. 2016 Apr 12;42:39. doi: 10.1186/s13052-016-0246-7.
7
Copy number variations in patients with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss: an arrayCGH approach.不明原因复发性流产患者的拷贝数变异:arrayCGH 方法。
Turk J Med Sci. 2022 Oct;52(5):1689-1696. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5511. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
8
Prenatal diagnosis using combined quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction and array comparative genomic hybridization analysis as a first-line test: results from over 1000 consecutive cases.采用联合定量荧光聚合酶链反应和阵列比较基因组杂交分析的产前诊断作为一线检测:1000 多例连续病例的结果。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;41(5):500-7. doi: 10.1002/uog.12429.
9
Application of chromosomal microarray in the evaluation of abnormal prenatal findings.染色体微阵列在异常产前发现评估中的应用。
Clin Genet. 2013 Jul;84(1):47-54. doi: 10.1111/cge.12027. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
10
Inconsistency of Karyotyping and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) in a Mosaic Turner Syndrome Case.一例嵌合型特纳综合征病例中核型分析与阵列比较基因组杂交(aCGH)结果的不一致性
Glob Med Genet. 2020 Dec;7(4):128-132. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1722974. Epub 2021 Feb 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of genetic alterations in couples and their products of conceptions from recurrent pregnancy loss in North Indian population.北印度人群复发性流产夫妇及其妊娠产物中基因改变的鉴定。
Front Genet. 2023 May 16;14:1155211. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1155211. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
Cytogenetic analysis of spontaneously discharged products of conception by array-based comparative genomic hybridization.采用基于芯片的比较基因组杂交技术对自然排出的妊娠产物进行细胞遗传学分析。
Springerplus. 2016 Jun 24;5(1):874. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2594-6. eCollection 2016.
2
Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.微阵列检测在妊娠丢失中的诊断效用。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;46(4):478-86. doi: 10.1002/uog.14866. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
Diagnostic utility of novel combined arrays for genome-wide simultaneous detection of aneuploidy and uniparental isodisomy in losses of pregnancy.
新型联合阵列在妊娠丢失中全基因组同时检测非整倍体和单亲同二体的诊断效用。
Mol Cytogenet. 2014 Jun 24;7:43. doi: 10.1186/1755-8166-7-43. eCollection 2014.
4
A comparative study of standard cytogenetic evaluation and molecular karyotyping for products of conception.对妊娠产物进行标准细胞遗传学评估和分子核型分析的比较研究。
Diagn Mol Pathol. 2013 Dec;22(4):228-35. doi: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e31829265ab.
5
Additional value of prenatal genomic array testing in fetuses with isolated structural ultrasound abnormalities and a normal karyotype: a systematic review of the literature.产前基因组阵列检测在孤立性结构超声异常且核型正常胎儿中的附加价值:文献系统综述
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;43(2):139-46. doi: 10.1002/uog.12575.
6
Additional information from chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) over conventional karyotyping when diagnosing chromosomal abnormalities in miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.当在流产中诊断染色体异常时,常规核型分析(conventional karyotyping)之外的染色体微阵列分析(chromosomal microarray analysis,CMA)提供的额外信息:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12382. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
7
First-trimester euploid miscarriages analysed by array-CGH.早孕期胚胎染色体非整倍体的阵列比较基因组杂交分析。
J Appl Genet. 2013 Aug;54(3):353-9. doi: 10.1007/s13353-013-0157-x. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
8
Detection rates of clinically significant genomic alterations by microarray analysis for specific anomalies detected by ultrasound.超声检出特定异常的微阵列分析对临床显著基因组改变的检出率。
Prenat Diagn. 2012 Oct;32(10):986-95. doi: 10.1002/pd.3943. Epub 2012 Jul 30.
9
Genetics of early miscarriage.早期流产的遗传学
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012 Dec;1822(12):1951-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.07.001. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
10
The role of DNA microarrays in the evaluation of fetal death.DNA 微阵列在评估胎儿死亡中的作用。
Prenat Diagn. 2012 Apr;32(4):371-5. doi: 10.1002/pd.3825.