Division of Evolution, Infection and Genomics, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, M13 9WL, Manchester, UK.
Fam Cancer. 2023 Jul;22(3):341-344. doi: 10.1007/s10689-023-00330-7. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
Recent genetic sequencing studies in large series' of predominantly childhood medulloblastoma have implicated loss-of-function, predominantly truncating, variants in the ELP1 and GPR161 genes in causation of the MB subtype specifically. The latter association, along with a report of an index case with some features of Gorlin syndrome has led to speculation that GPR161 may also cause Gorlin syndrome. We show that these genes are associated with relatively low absolute risks of medulloblastoma from extrapolating lifetime risks in the general population and odds ratios from the population database gnomAD. The projected risks are around 1 in 270-430 for ELP1 and 1 in 1600-2500 for GPR161. These risks do not suggest the need for MRI screening in infants with ELP1 or GPR161 variants as this is not currently recommended for PTCH1 where the risks are equivalent or higher. We also screened 27 PTCH1/SUFU pathogenic variant-negative patients with Gorlin syndrome for GPR161 and found no suspicious variants. Given the population frequencies of 0.0962% for GPR161 and 0.0687% for ELP1, neither of these genes can be a cause of Gorlin syndrome with an unexplained population frequency far lower at 0.0021%.
最近在大量以儿童髓母细胞瘤为主的研究中进行的基因测序研究表明,ELP1 和 GPR161 基因的功能丧失,主要是截断变异,与 MB 亚型的病因有关。后一种关联,以及一例具有戈林综合征某些特征的索引病例的报告,导致人们推测 GPR161 也可能导致戈林综合征。我们表明,这些基因与髓母细胞瘤的相对较低的绝对风险相关,从一般人群的终身风险和人群数据库 gnomAD 的比值比推断得出。ELP1 的预测风险约为每 270-430 人中 1 例,GPR161 的预测风险约为每 1600-2500 人中 1 例。这些风险并不表明需要对携带 ELP1 或 GPR161 变异的婴儿进行 MRI 筛查,因为目前不建议对风险相当或更高的 PTCH1 进行筛查。我们还对 27 例戈林综合征患者进行了 GPR161 的 SUFU 致病性变异阴性筛查,未发现可疑变异。鉴于 GPR161 的人群频率为 0.0962%,ELP1 的人群频率为 0.0687%,这两个基因都不能成为戈林综合征的病因,而戈林综合征的未解释人群频率远低于 0.0021%。