Sánchez-Vincitore Laura V, Castro Arachu
Neurocognition and Psychophysiology Laboratory, Universidad Iberoamericana (UNIBE), Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.
Department of International Health and Sustainable Development, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Jul 19;2(7):e0000465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000465. eCollection 2022.
The association between sociodemographic factors-poverty, lack of maternal schooling, being male at birth-, childhood developmental delay, and poor educational outcomes has been established in the Dominican Republic (DR). However, family moderating factors present or introduced to buffer sociodemographic factors effects on early childhood development (ECD) are still unknown. We conducted a secondary analysis of the DR's 2014 and 2019 Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys. We had four study aims: 1) confirm the relationship between socioeconomic position (SP), parenting practices, and ECD; 2) determine if a sociodemographic model predicted ECD; 3) determine if a psychosocial model (family childrearing practices, discipline, and early childhood stimulation) predicted ECD above and beyond the sociodemographic model; 4) explore mothers' beliefs about physical punishment and its relationship with ECD and psychosocial variables. We found that both models predicted ECD significantly, but the psychosocial model explained more variance than the sociodemographic model (6.3% in 2014 and 4.4% in 2019). The most relevant sociodemographic predictors were SP (explaining 21.6% of ECD variance in 2014 and 18.6% in 2019) and mother's education (explaining 13.9% in 2014 and 14.1% in 2019). The most salient ECD psychosocial predictors were: negative discipline, number of children's books at home, stimulating activities at home, and attendance to an early childhood education program. The predicting weights of the independent variables were similar for both years. These results have multiple implications for social programs that aim to improve children's potential in contexts of poverty. Although the results show a protective effect of psychosocial factors, sustainable and large-scale interventions should not be limited to just buffering effects, but to solve the underlying problem, which is that poverty prevents children from reaching their developmental potential and exposes them to life-long greater risk for chronic disease. Addressing delays early in life can therefore contribute to achieving health equity.
在多米尼加共和国(DR),社会人口因素(贫困、母亲未受过教育、出生时为男性)、儿童发育迟缓与不良教育成果之间的关联已得到证实。然而,目前尚不清楚存在哪些或引入了哪些家庭调节因素来缓冲社会人口因素对幼儿发展(ECD)的影响。我们对DR 2014年和2019年的多指标类集调查进行了二次分析。我们有四个研究目标:1)确认社会经济地位(SP)、育儿方式与ECD之间的关系;2)确定社会人口模型是否能预测ECD;3)确定心理社会模型(家庭育儿方式、管教和幼儿刺激)在社会人口模型之外是否能预测ECD;4)探究母亲对体罚的看法及其与ECD和心理社会变量的关系。我们发现,两个模型都能显著预测ECD,但心理社会模型比社会人口模型解释的方差更多(2014年为6.3%,2019年为4.4%)。最相关的社会人口预测因素是SP(2014年解释ECD方差的21.6%,2019年为18.6%)和母亲的教育程度(2014年为13.9%,2019年为14.1%)。最显著的ECD心理社会预测因素是:负面管教、家中儿童书籍数量、家中的刺激活动以及参加幼儿教育项目。这两年自变量的预测权重相似。这些结果对旨在提高贫困环境中儿童潜力的社会项目具有多重意义。尽管结果显示了心理社会因素的保护作用,但可持续的大规模干预不应仅限于缓冲效应,而应解决根本问题,即贫困阻碍儿童发挥其发展潜力,并使他们面临终身患慢性病的更大风险。因此,尽早解决发育迟缓问题有助于实现健康公平。