• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)文件与临床试验.gov网站上关于孤儿药相关临床试验数据的差异。

Discrepancies between FDA documents and ClinicalTrials.gov for Orphan Drug-related clinical trial data.

作者信息

Choudhury Mohua Chakraborty, Chakraborty Indraneel, Saberwal Gayatri

机构信息

Institute of Bioinformatics and Applied Biotechnology, Bengaluru, India.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Apr 22;2(4):e0000261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000261. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0000261
PMID:36962222
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10021800/
Abstract

Clinical trial registries such as ClinicalTrials.gov (CTG) hold large amounts of data regarding trials. Drugs for rare diseases are known as orphan drugs (ODs), and it is particularly important that trials for ODs are registered, and the data in the trial record are accurate. However, there may be discrepancies between trial-related data that were the basis for the approval of a drug, as available from Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documents such as the Medical Review, and the data in CTG. We performed an audit of FDA-approved ODs, comparing trial-related data on phase, enrollment, and enrollment attribute (anticipated or actual) in such FDA documents and in CTG. The Medical Reviews of 63 ODs listed 422 trials. We used study identifiers in the Medical Reviews to find matches with the trial ID number, 'Other ID' or 'Acronyms' in CTG, and identified 202 trials that were registered with CTG. In comparing the phase data from the 'Table of Clinical Studies' of the Medical Review, with the data in CTG, there were exact matches in only 75% of the cases. The enrollment matched only in 70% of the cases, and the enrollment attribute in 91% of the cases. A similar trend was found for the sub-set of pivotal trials. Going forward, for all trials listed in a registry, it is important to provide the trial ID in the Medical Review. This will ensure that all trials that are the basis of a drug approval can be swiftly and unambiguously identified in CTG. Also, there continue to be discrepancies in trial data between FDA documents and CTG. Data in the trial records in CTG need to be updated when relevant.

摘要

诸如ClinicalTrials.gov(CTG)之类的临床试验注册机构拥有大量与试验相关的数据。用于罕见病的药物被称为孤儿药(OD),对孤儿药试验进行注册且试验记录中的数据准确尤为重要。然而,作为药物批准依据的试验相关数据(可从美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的文件如医学审评中获取)与CTG中的数据之间可能存在差异。我们对FDA批准的孤儿药进行了审核,比较了此类FDA文件和CTG中关于试验阶段、入组人数及入组属性(预期或实际)的试验相关数据。63种孤儿药的医学审评列出了422项试验。我们利用医学审评中的研究标识符在CTG中查找与试验ID号、“其他ID”或“首字母缩写”的匹配项,确定了202项在CTG中注册的试验。在比较医学审评“临床研究表”中的阶段数据与CTG中的数据时,仅有75%的情况完全匹配。入组人数仅有70%的情况匹配,入组属性有91%的情况匹配。关键试验子集也发现了类似趋势。展望未来,对于注册机构列出的所有试验,在医学审评中提供试验ID很重要。这将确保在CTG中能迅速且明确地识别出作为药物批准依据的所有试验。此外,FDA文件和CTG之间的试验数据仍存在差异。CTG中试验记录的数据在相关时需要更新。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1327/10021800/bafe6f80855d/pgph.0000261.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1327/10021800/bafe6f80855d/pgph.0000261.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1327/10021800/bafe6f80855d/pgph.0000261.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Discrepancies between FDA documents and ClinicalTrials.gov for Orphan Drug-related clinical trial data.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)文件与临床试验.gov网站上关于孤儿药相关临床试验数据的差异。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Apr 22;2(4):e0000261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000261. eCollection 2022.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Hidden duplicates: 10s or 100s of Indian trials, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, have not been registered in India, as required by law.潜在重复:数以百计的印度临床试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,但根据法律要求,这些试验并未在印度注册。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234925. eCollection 2020.
4
Postmarketing commitments for novel drugs and biologics approved by the US Food and Drug Administration: a cross-sectional analysis.美国食品和药物管理局批准的新型药物和生物制品的上市后承诺:一项横断面分析。
BMC Med. 2019 Jun 17;17(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1344-3.
5
ClinicalTrials.gov and Drugs@FDA: A Comparison of Results Reporting for New Drug Approval Trials.ClinicalTrials.gov与美国食品药品监督管理局药品数据库:新药批准试验结果报告的比较
Ann Intern Med. 2016 Sep 20;165(6):421-30. doi: 10.7326/M15-2658. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
6
Participant Recruitment From Low- and Middle-Income Countries for Pivotal Trials of Drugs Approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration : A Cross-Sectional Analysis.从低收入和中等收入国家招募参与者参与美国食品和药物管理局批准的药物的关键性试验:一项横断面分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2022 Dec;175(12):1675-1684. doi: 10.7326/M22-1857. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
7
Association of the FDA Amendment Act with trial registration, publication, and outcome reporting.《美国食品药品监督管理局修正案法案》与试验注册、发表及结果报告的关联
Trials. 2017 Jul 18;18(1):333. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2068-3.
8
Assessment of Reported Trial Characteristics, Rate of Publication, and Inclusion of Mandatory Biopsies of Research Biopsies in Clinical Trials in Oncology.评估肿瘤学临床试验中报告的试验特征、发表率以及研究活检中强制性活检的纳入情况。
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):402-405. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4640.
9
Clinical trial evidence supporting FDA approval of novel therapeutic agents, 2005-2012.2005-2012 年支持 FDA 批准新型治疗药物的临床试验证据。
JAMA. 2014;311(4):368-77. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.282034.
10
Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study.FDAAA 前后支持 FDA 批准神经精神药物的临床试验的注册、结果报告和发表偏倚:一项回顾性队列研究
Trials. 2018 Oct 23;19(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2957-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Discrepancies in reported results between trial registries and journal articles for AI clinical research.人工智能临床研究的试验注册机构与期刊文章所报告结果之间的差异。
EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Jan 20;80:103066. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103066. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Data from the Indian drug regulator and from Clinical Trials Registry-India does not always match.来自印度药品监管机构以及“印度临床试验注册中心”的数据并非总是一致。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 15;11:1346208. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1346208. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative analysis of important public clinical trial registries, and a proposal for an interim ideal one.重要公共临床试验注册库的比较分析,及一个临时理想库的建议。
PLoS One. 2021 May 11;16(5):e0251191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251191. eCollection 2021.
2
Consistency of trial reporting between ClinicalTrials.gov and corresponding publications: one decade after FDAAA.《FDAAA 实施十年后:ClinicalTrials.gov 与相应出版物之间试验报告的一致性》
Trials. 2020 Jul 23;21(1):675. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04603-9.
3
Hidden duplicates: 10s or 100s of Indian trials, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, have not been registered in India, as required by law.
潜在重复:数以百计的印度临床试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,但根据法律要求,这些试验并未在印度注册。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234925. eCollection 2020.
4
10-Year Update on Study Results Submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov.提交至ClinicalTrials.gov的研究结果的10年更新
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 14;381(20):1966-1974. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr1907644.
5
An analysis of deficiencies in the data of interventional drug trials registered with Clinical Trials Registry - India.对临床试验注册中心 - 印度登记的介入性药物试验数据缺陷的分析。
Trials. 2019 Aug 28;20(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3592-0.
6
Some data quality issues at ClinicalTrials.gov.ClinicalTrials.gov 存在一些数据质量问题。
Trials. 2019 Jun 24;20(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3408-2.
7
Registration, results reporting, and publication bias of clinical trials supporting FDA approval of neuropsychiatric drugs before and after FDAAA: a retrospective cohort study.FDAAA 前后支持 FDA 批准神经精神药物的临床试验的注册、结果报告和发表偏倚:一项回顾性队列研究
Trials. 2018 Oct 23;19(1):581. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2957-0.
8
Noncommercial Funders' Policies on Trial Registration, Access to Summary Results, and Individual Patient Data Availability.非商业资助者的试验注册、摘要结果获取和个体患者数据可及性政策。
JAMA. 2018 Apr 24;319(16):1721-1723. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2841.
9
Comparison of Data on Serious Adverse Events and Mortality in ClinicalTrials.gov, Corresponding Journal Articles, and FDA Medical Reviews: Cross-Sectional Analysis.临床试验.gov 上严重不良事件和死亡率数据与相应期刊文章和 FDA 医疗审查的比较: 横断面分析。
Drug Saf. 2018 Sep;41(9):849-857. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0666-y.
10
Prevalence of clinical trial status discrepancies: A cross-sectional study of 10,492 trials registered on both ClinicalTrials.gov and the European Union Clinical Trials Register.临床试验状态差异的流行率:一项在 ClinicalTrials.gov 和欧盟临床试验注册中心登记的 10492 项试验的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193088. eCollection 2018.