• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

来自印度药品监管机构以及“印度临床试验注册中心”的数据并非总是一致。

Data from the Indian drug regulator and from Clinical Trials Registry-India does not always match.

作者信息

Bhalla Iqbal S, Ravindranath Adithi Gopadi, Vaswani Ravi, Saberwal Gayatri

机构信息

School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Department of Biotechnology, PES University, Bengaluru, India.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 15;11:1346208. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1346208. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1346208
PMID:38435394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10906088/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In India, regulatory trials, which require the drug regulator's permission, must be registered with the Clinical Trials Registry-India (CTRI) as of 19 March 2019. In this study, for about 300 trials, we aimed to identify the CTRI record that matched the trial for which the regulator had given permission. After identifying 'true pairs', our goal was to determine whether the sites and Principal Investigators mentioned in the permission letter were the same as those mentioned in the CTRI record.

METHODS

We developed a methodology to compare the regulator's permission letters with CTRI records. We manually validated 151 true pairs by comparing the titles, the drug interventions, and the indications. We then examined discrepancies in their trial sites and Principal Investigators.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed substantial variations in the number and identity of sites and Principal Investigators between the permission letters and the CTRI records.

DISCUSSION

These discrepancies raise concerns about the accuracy and transparency of regulatory trials in India. We recommend easier data extraction from regulatory documents, cross-referencing regulatory documents and CTRI records, making public the changes to approval letters, and enforcing oversight by Institutional Ethics Committees for site additions or deletions. These steps will increase transparency around regulatory trials running in India.

摘要

引言

在印度,自2019年3月19日起,需要药品监管机构批准的注册试验必须在印度临床试验注册中心(CTRI)进行注册。在本研究中,针对约300项试验,我们旨在识别与监管机构已批准试验相匹配的CTRI记录。在识别出“真实配对”后,我们的目标是确定批准信中提及的试验地点和主要研究者是否与CTRI记录中提及的一致。

方法

我们开发了一种方法来比较监管机构的批准信与CTRI记录。通过比较标题、药物干预措施和适应症,我们手动验证了151对真实配对。然后,我们检查了它们在试验地点和主要研究者方面的差异。

结果

我们的研究结果显示,批准信与CTRI记录之间在试验地点数量和身份以及主要研究者方面存在显著差异。

讨论

这些差异引发了对印度注册试验准确性和透明度的担忧。我们建议更轻松地从监管文件中提取数据,交叉引用监管文件和CTRI记录,公开批准信的变更,并由机构伦理委员会对试验地点的增减进行监督。这些措施将提高印度正在进行的注册试验的透明度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a419/10906088/30ee0775e838/fmed-11-1346208-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a419/10906088/30ee0775e838/fmed-11-1346208-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a419/10906088/30ee0775e838/fmed-11-1346208-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Data from the Indian drug regulator and from Clinical Trials Registry-India does not always match.来自印度药品监管机构以及“印度临床试验注册中心”的数据并非总是一致。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 15;11:1346208. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1346208. eCollection 2024.
2
Hidden duplicates: 10s or 100s of Indian trials, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, have not been registered in India, as required by law.潜在重复:数以百计的印度临床试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,但根据法律要求,这些试验并未在印度注册。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234925. eCollection 2020.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
An analysis of deficiencies in the data of interventional drug trials registered with Clinical Trials Registry - India.对临床试验注册中心 - 印度登记的介入性药物试验数据缺陷的分析。
Trials. 2019 Aug 28;20(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3592-0.
5
Public disclosure of clinical trial results at Clinical Trial Registry of India- Need for transparency in research!印度临床试验注册中心对临床试验结果的公开披露——研究需要透明度!
Perspect Clin Res. 2023 Apr-Jun;14(2):81-85. doi: 10.4103/picr.picr_39_22. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
6
Clinical Trials Registry - India: A decadal perspective.临床试验注册印度:十年展望。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2020 Jul-Aug;52(4):272-282. doi: 10.4103/ijp.IJP_24_20.
7
Publication of neurology clinical trials registered with clinical trial registry of India: A cross-sectional study.印度临床试验注册中心注册的神经病学临床试验发表情况:一项横断面研究。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2022 Nov;146(5):475-484. doi: 10.1111/ane.13669. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
An analysis of deficiencies in the ethics committee data of certain interventional trials registered with the Clinical Trials Registry-India.对在印度临床试验注册中心注册的某些干预性试验伦理委员会数据缺陷的分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;2(10):e0000617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000617. eCollection 2022.
9
Three levels of discrepancies in the records of trial sites in India, registered with the European Union Clinical Trials Register.在欧盟临床试验注册处登记的印度试验地点记录中的三个差异级别。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 5;11:1357930. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1357930. eCollection 2024.
10
CTRI - Clicking to greater transparency and accountability.CTRI - 点击实现更高的透明度和问责制。
Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Oct;3(4):122-4. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.103592.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical trial registration in India: 12% of drug regulatory trials are not registered, as required by law.印度的临床试验注册情况:12%的药品监管试验未按法律要求进行注册。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Feb 18;23(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01288-x.
2
Three levels of discrepancies in the records of trial sites in India, registered with the European Union Clinical Trials Register.在欧盟临床试验注册处登记的印度试验地点记录中的三个差异级别。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jul 5;11:1357930. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1357930. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
In Clinical Trials Registry-India, the classification of sponsors needs to be standardised.在临床试验注册印度,需要对赞助商的分类进行标准化。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2024 Jan-Mar;IX(1):11-18. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2023.071.
2
An analysis of deficiencies in the ethics committee data of certain interventional trials registered with the Clinical Trials Registry-India.对在印度临床试验注册中心注册的某些干预性试验伦理委员会数据缺陷的分析。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Oct 24;2(10):e0000617. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000617. eCollection 2022.
3
Discrepancies between FDA documents and ClinicalTrials.gov for Orphan Drug-related clinical trial data.
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)文件与临床试验.gov网站上关于孤儿药相关临床试验数据的差异。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Apr 22;2(4):e0000261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000261. eCollection 2022.
4
US congress committee calls for tougher action on trial sponsors who fail to meet reporting deadlines.
BMJ. 2023 Jan 30;380:235. doi: 10.1136/bmj.p235.
5
CTRI requirement of prospective trial registration: Not always consistent.CTRI 要求前瞻性试验注册:并非总是一致。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2022 Oct-Dec;VII(4):312-314. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2022.033. Epub 2022 May 13.
6
A comparative analysis of important public clinical trial registries, and a proposal for an interim ideal one.重要公共临床试验注册库的比较分析,及一个临时理想库的建议。
PLoS One. 2021 May 11;16(5):e0251191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251191. eCollection 2021.
7
Hidden duplicates: 10s or 100s of Indian trials, registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, have not been registered in India, as required by law.潜在重复:数以百计的印度临床试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册,但根据法律要求,这些试验并未在印度注册。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 19;15(6):e0234925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234925. eCollection 2020.
8
An analysis of deficiencies in the data of interventional drug trials registered with Clinical Trials Registry - India.对临床试验注册中心 - 印度登记的介入性药物试验数据缺陷的分析。
Trials. 2019 Aug 28;20(1):535. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3592-0.
9
Discrepancies between ClinicalTrials.gov recruitment status and actual trial status: a cross-sectional analysis.ClinicalTrials.gov招募状态与实际试验状态之间的差异:一项横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 11;7(10):e017719. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017719.
10
Previously unidentified duplicate registrations of clinical trials: an exploratory analysis of registry data worldwide.此前未被识别的临床试验重复注册情况:一项全球注册数据的探索性分析
Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 15;5(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0283-8.