Bansah Eyram Cyril, Adanu Kekeli Kodjo, Adedia David, Addo-Lartey Adolphina Addoley
Department of Surgery, Richard Novati Catholic Hospital, Sogakope, Ghana.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;3(1):e0001143. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001143. eCollection 2023.
Despite the established positive benefits, LMICs' adoption of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is inadequate, with as little as 20% use. This study assessed the utilization and beliefs that drive the non-utilization of the WHO SSC among surgical providers at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH) in Accra, Ghana. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 186 surgical providers at the KBTH in Ghana. Data collected included the category of personnel, awareness of the SSC, training received, previously identified barriers, and staff perceptions. Utilization and drivers associated with non-utilization of the SSC were assessed using bivariate log-binomial regression. Out of 190 surgical professionals invited, 186 gave their consent and participated in the survey, giving a response rate of 97.9%. Respondents comprised 69 (37%) surgeons, 66 (36%) anesthetists, and 51 (27%) nurses. Only 30.4% of surgical professionals always use the SSC, as advised by WHO. The majority (67.7%) of surgical professionals had received no formal training on using the WHO SSC. The proportion was highest among surgeons (81.2%) compared to anesthetists (66.7%) and nurses (51%). Surgeons were perceived by other professionals to be the least supportive of checklist use (87.6%), in contrast to nurses (96.1%) and anesthetists (93.9%). Significant drivers associated with checklist usage among surgical professionals included the SSC taking too long to complete, poor communication between anesthetist and surgeon, checklist not covering all perioperative risks, difficulty finding a coordinator, poor attitude of team members toward questions, surgical specialty/unit and training status of professionals. The checklist was always used by only a small (30%) proportion of surgical professionals at the KBTH. Improving checklist use will necessitate its careful application to all surgical operations and a cycle of periodic training that includes context-specific adjustments, checklist auditing, and feedback from local coordinators.
尽管已证实有积极益处,但低收入和中等收入国家对世界卫生组织手术安全核对表(SSC)的采用情况并不理想,使用率低至20%。本研究评估了加纳阿克拉科勒布教学医院(KBTH)外科医护人员对世界卫生组织SSC的使用情况以及导致不使用的观念。在加纳KBTH的186名外科医护人员中进行了一项横断面研究。收集的数据包括人员类别、对SSC的知晓情况、接受的培训、先前确定的障碍以及工作人员的看法。使用双变量对数二项回归评估与不使用SSC相关的使用情况和驱动因素。在邀请的190名外科专业人员中,186人同意并参与了调查,回复率为97.9%。受访者包括69名(37%)外科医生、66名(36%)麻醉师和51名(27%)护士。只有30.4%的外科专业人员按照世界卫生组织的建议始终使用SSC。大多数(67.7%)外科专业人员未接受过关于使用世界卫生组织SSC的正规培训。与麻醉师(66.7%)和护士(51%)相比,外科医生中的这一比例最高(81.2%)。其他专业人员认为外科医生对核对表使用的支持度最低(87.6%),而护士(96.1%)和麻醉师(93.9%)的支持度较高。与外科专业人员核对表使用相关的重要驱动因素包括完成SSC耗时过长、麻醉师与外科医生之间沟通不畅、核对表未涵盖所有围手术期风险、难以找到协调员、团队成员对问题态度不佳、外科专业/科室以及专业人员的培训状况。在KBTH,只有一小部分(30%)外科专业人员始终使用核对表。提高核对表的使用率需要将其谨慎应用于所有外科手术,并进行定期培训循环,包括针对具体情况的调整、核对表审核以及当地协调员的反馈。