• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际视角下的手术安全检查表修改

International Perspectives on Modifications to the Surgical Safety Checklist.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317183. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17183.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17183
PMID:37285154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10248735/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Modification of the World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) is a critical component of its implementation. To facilitate the SSC's use, it is important to know how surgical teams modify their SSCs, their reasons for making modifications, and the opportunities and challenges teams face in SSC tailoring.

OBJECTIVE

To study SSC modifications in high-income hospital settings in 5 countries: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United States, and the United Kingdom.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews based on the survey used in the quantitative study. Each interviewee was asked a core set of questions and various follow-up questions based on their survey responses. Interviews were conducted from July 2019 to February 2020 in person and online using teleconferencing software. Surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and hospital administrators from the 5 countries were recruited through a survey and snowball sampling.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Interviewees' attitudes and perceptions on SSC modifications and their perceived impact on operating rooms.

RESULTS

A total of 51 surgical team members and hospital administrators from the 5 countries were interviewed (37 [75%] with >10 years of service; 28 [55%] women). There were 15 (29%) surgeons, 13 (26%) nurses, 15 (29%) anesthesiologists, and 8 (16%) health administrators. Five themes emerged concerning the awareness and involvement in SSC modifications; reasons for modifications; types of modifications; the outcomes of modifications; and perceived barriers to SSC modifications. Based on the interviews, some SSCs may go many years without being revisited or modified. SSCs are modified to ensure they address local issues and standards of practice and that they are fit for purpose. Modifications are also made following adverse events to reduce the risk of reoccurrence. Interviewees described adding, moving, and removing elements from their SSCs, which increased their sense of ownership in their SSC and participation in its performance. Some barriers to modification included leadership and the SSC's inclusion in hospitals' electronic medical record.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this qualitative study of surgical team members and administrators, interviewees described addressing contemporary surgical issues through various SSC modifications. The process of SSC modification may improve team cohesion and buy-in in addition to providing opportunities for teams to improve patient safety.

摘要

重要性

世界卫生组织手术安全检查表(SSC)的修改是其实施的关键组成部分。为了方便 SSC 的使用,了解手术团队如何修改其 SSC、修改的原因以及团队在 SSC 定制方面面临的机会和挑战非常重要。

目的

在澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰、美国和英国这 5 个高收入国家的医院环境中研究 SSC 的修改。

设计、地点和参与者:这项定性研究使用了基于定量研究中使用的半结构化访谈。根据他们的调查回复,每位受访者都被问到了一组核心问题和各种后续问题。访谈于 2019 年 7 月至 2020 年 2 月在澳大利亚、加拿大、新西兰、美国和英国的 5 个国家进行,采用面对面和在线电话会议软件的方式进行。通过调查和滚雪球抽样,从这 5 个国家招募了外科医生、麻醉师、护士和医院管理人员。

主要结果和措施

受访者对 SSC 修改的态度和看法,以及他们对手术室的感知影响。

结果

来自这 5 个国家的 51 名外科手术团队成员和医院管理人员接受了采访(服务年限超过 10 年的有 37 人[75%];女性 28 人[55%])。受访者中有 15 人(29%)是外科医生,13 人(26%)是护士,15 人(29%)是麻醉师,8 人(16%)是卫生管理人员。出现了 5 个主题,涉及对 SSC 修改的认识和参与;修改的原因;修改的类型;修改的结果;以及对 SSC 修改的感知障碍。根据访谈,一些 SSCs 可能多年来都没有被重新审查或修改。修改 SSCs 是为了确保它们解决当地问题和实践标准,并且适合特定用途。修改还可以在发生不良事件后进行,以降低再次发生的风险。受访者描述了在他们的 SSCs 中添加、移动和删除元素,这增加了他们对 SSC 的所有权和对其执行的参与感。修改的一些障碍包括领导力和 SSC 被纳入医院的电子病历。

结论和相关性

在这项对手术团队成员和管理人员的定性研究中,受访者描述了通过各种 SSC 修改来解决当代手术问题。SSC 修改的过程除了为团队提供提高患者安全性的机会外,还可能提高团队凝聚力和参与度。

相似文献

1
International Perspectives on Modifications to the Surgical Safety Checklist.国际视角下的手术安全检查表修改
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jun 1;6(6):e2317183. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.17183.
2
Using i-PARIHS to assess implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist: an international qualitative study.运用 i-PARIHS 评估手术安全核对表的实施:一项国际定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):1284. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08680-1.
3
How does the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist fit with existing perioperative risk management strategies? An ethnographic study across surgical specialties.世卫组织手术安全检查表如何与现有的围手术期风险管理策略相契合?一项跨外科专业的民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4965-5.
4
The surgical safety checklist: a quantitative study on attitudes and barriers among gynecological surgery teams.手术安全核对表:妇科手术团队态度和障碍的定量研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 16;21(1):1106. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07130-8.
5
Narrative feedback from OR personnel about the safety of their surgical practice before and after a surgical safety checklist intervention.手术室人员关于手术安全核查干预前后其手术操作安全性的叙述性反馈。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Aug 1;29(4):461-469. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx050.
6
Implementation of the surgical safety checklist in hospitals of Iran; operating room personnel's attitude, awareness and acceptance.伊朗医院手术安全核对表的实施;手术室人员的态度、认知与接受情况。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2018 Jul 9;31(6):609-618. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-03-2017-0051.
7
Barriers and enablers to utilisation of the WHO surgical safety checklist at the university teaching hospital in Lusaka, Zambia: a qualitative study.赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院使用世界卫生组织手术安全检查表的障碍和促进因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 9;22(1):894. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08257-y.
8
Development of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Surgical Safety Checklist Through a Modified Delphi Process.通过改良德尔菲法制定外科手术安全检查表以促进术后快速康复。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2248460. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48460.
9
Going beyond compliance: A qualitative study of the practice of surgical safety checklist.超越合规:手术安全核查表实践的定性研究
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Mar;345:116652. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116652. Epub 2024 Feb 11.
10
Adapting the World Health Organization's Surgical Safety Checklist to High-Income Settings: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Trial Protocol.将世界卫生组织手术安全核对表应用于高收入环境:一项有效性与实施相结合的混合试验方案。
Ann Surg Open. 2024 May 22;5(2):e436. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000436. eCollection 2024 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventions to Improve Compliance to Surgical Safety Checklist Use: Before-and-After Study at a Tertiary Public Hospital in Croatia.提高手术安全检查表使用依从性的干预措施:克罗地亚一家三级公立医院的前后对照研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 10;13(16):1959. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13161959.
2
Does the Surgical Safety Checklist need a co-pilot? Comparing adherence in gynecological surgery through electronic medical records and OR Black Box video observations.手术安全核对表需要副驾驶吗?通过电子病历和手术室黑匣子视频观察比较妇科手术中的依从性。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jul 17. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11966-0.
3
Wrong-site, wrong-procedure, and retained foreign object events in out-of-hospital settings: analysis of closed medico-legal complaints in Canada (2012-2021).院外环境中的错误部位、错误手术及异物遗留事件:加拿大已结案医疗法律投诉分析(2012 - 2021年)
Patient Saf Surg. 2025 Apr 10;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13037-025-00432-4.
4
Obstacles to using the safe surgery checklist: Perspectives of first-line personnel.使用安全手术检查表的障碍:一线人员的观点。
SAGE Open Med. 2024 Sep 18;12:20503121241278229. doi: 10.1177/20503121241278229. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical Teams' Attitudes About Surgical Safety and the Surgical Safety Checklist at 10 Years: .外科团队对手术安全及手术安全核对表十年后的态度:
Ann Surg Open. 2021 Jul 6;2(3):e075. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000075. eCollection 2021 Sep.
2
Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples.立意抽样:复杂还是简单?研究案例
J Res Nurs. 2020 Dec;25(8):652-661. doi: 10.1177/1744987120927206. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
3
We Asked the Experts: The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist and the COVID-19 Pandemic: Recommendations for Content and Implementation Adaptations.我们咨询了专家:世界卫生组织手术安全检查表与 COVID-19 大流行:内容和实施调整建议。
World J Surg. 2021 May;45(5):1293-1296. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06000-y. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
4
Improving the quality of administration of the Surgical Safety Checklist: a mixed methods study in New Zealand hospitals.提高手术安全检查表管理质量:新西兰医院的混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 16;8(12):e022882. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022882.
5
World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist Modification: Do Changes Emphasize Communication and Teamwork?世界卫生组织手术安全核对表修订版:强调沟通和团队合作的改变?
J Surg Res. 2020 Feb;246:614-622. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.035. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
6
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization.定性研究中的饱和度:探索其概念化与操作化
Qual Quant. 2018;52(4):1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
7
Mortality Trends After a Voluntary Checklist-based Surgical Safety Collaborative.自愿基于清单的手术安全协作后的死亡率趋势。
Ann Surg. 2017 Dec;266(6):923-929. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002249.
8
Unlocking the "black box" of practice improvement strategies to implement surgical safety checklists: a process evaluation.揭开实施手术安全检查表的实践改进策略的“黑匣子”:一项过程评估。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017 Apr 5;10:157-166. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S124298. eCollection 2017.
9
Annals of Surgery Looks at The Opioid Crisis.《外科年鉴》关注阿片类药物危机。
Ann Surg. 2017 Apr;265(4):692. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002149.
10
Is Communication Improved With the Implementation of an Obstetrical Version of the World Health Organization Safe Surgery Checklist?实施世界卫生组织产科安全手术检查表后沟通是否得到改善?
J Patient Saf. 2020 Dec;16(4):279-283. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000327.