Shivam Shashwat, Weitz Joshua S, Wardi Yorai
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;2(12):e0001312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001312. eCollection 2022.
The COVAX program aims to provide global equitable access to life-saving vaccines. Despite calls for increased sharing, vaccine protectionism has limited progress towards vaccine sharing goals. For example, as of April 2022 only ~20% of the population in Africa had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Here we use a two-nation coupled epidemic model to evaluate optimal vaccine-sharing policies given a selfish objective: in which countries with vaccine stockpiles aim to minimize fatalities in their own population. Computational analysis of a suite of simulated epidemics reveal that it is often optimal for a donor country to share a significant fraction of its vaccine stockpile with a recipient country that has no vaccine stockpile. Sharing a vaccine stockpile reduces the intensity of outbreaks in the recipient, in turn reducing travel-associated incidence in the donor. This effect is intensified as vaccination rates in a donor country decrease and epidemic coupling between countries increases. Critically, vaccine sharing by a donor significantly reduces transmission and fatalities in the recipient. Moreover, the same computational framework reveals the potential use of hybrid sharing policies that have a negligible effect on fatalities in the donor compared to the optimal policy while significantly reducing fatalities in the recipient. Altogether, these findings provide a self-interested rationale for countries to consider sharing part of their vaccine stockpiles.
新冠肺炎疫苗实施计划(COVAX)旨在实现全球公平获取救命疫苗。尽管呼吁加强疫苗共享,但疫苗保护主义阻碍了在实现疫苗共享目标方面取得进展。例如,截至2022年4月,非洲只有约20%的人口接种了至少一剂新冠疫苗。在此,我们使用两国耦合疫情模型来评估在自私目标下的最优疫苗共享政策:即有疫苗储备的国家旨在尽量减少本国人口中的死亡人数。对一系列模拟疫情的计算分析表明,对于一个捐助国来说,通常最优的做法是与没有疫苗储备的受援国分享其很大一部分疫苗储备。分享疫苗储备会降低受援国疫情爆发的强度,进而减少与旅行相关的捐助国发病率。随着捐助国疫苗接种率下降以及国家间疫情耦合增加,这种效应会增强。至关重要的是,捐助国分享疫苗会显著降低受援国的传播率和死亡率。此外,同样的计算框架揭示了混合共享政策的潜在用途,与最优政策相比,这些政策对捐助国的死亡率影响可忽略不计,同时能显著降低受援国的死亡率。总之,这些发现为各国考虑分享部分疫苗储备提供了一个出于自身利益的理由。