• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives.出于自私目的的疫苗储备共享。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;2(12):e0001312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001312. eCollection 2022.
2
COVAX, vaccine donations and the politics of global vaccine inequity.新冠疫苗全球获取机制、疫苗捐赠与全球疫苗不平等的政治问题
Global Health. 2022 Mar 5;18(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12992-022-00801-z.
3
To give or not to give? Pandemic vaccine donation policy.给还是不给?大流行病疫苗捐赠政策。
Public Health. 2024 Aug;233:164-169. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2024.05.011. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
4
Framework for Optimal Global Vaccine Stockpile Design for Vaccine-Preventable Diseases: Application to Measles and Cholera Vaccines as Contrasting Examples.疫苗可预防疾病的全球最佳疫苗储备设计框架:以麻疹和霍乱疫苗为例进行对比应用
Risk Anal. 2016 Jul;36(7):1487-509. doi: 10.1111/risa.12265. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
5
International Collaboration to Ensure Equitable Access to Vaccines for COVID-19: The ACT-Accelerator and the COVAX Facility.国际合作确保公平获取 COVID-19 疫苗:ACT-Accelerator 和 COVAX 设施。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):426-449. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12503. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
6
Optimizing the dose of pre-pandemic influenza vaccines to reduce the infection attack rate.优化大流行前流感疫苗的剂量以降低感染攻击率。
PLoS Med. 2007 Jun;4(6):e218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040218.
7
How enlightened self-interest guided global vaccine sharing benefits all: A modeling study.从自利到共益:基于模型的全球疫苗公平分配策略研究。
J Glob Health. 2023 Dec 20;13:06038. doi: 10.7189/jogh.13.06038.
8
Mitigating donor interests in the case of COVID-19 vaccine: the implication of COVAX and DAC membership.减轻 COVID-19 疫苗供应方的利益考量:COVAX 和 DAC 成员资格的影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 Jan;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010188.
9
Stockpile levels for pediatric vaccines: how much is enough?儿童疫苗的储备水平:多少才足够?
Vaccine. 2006 Apr 24;24(17):3530-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.02.004. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
10
The development of global vaccine stockpiles.全球疫苗储备的发展。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;15(3):340-7. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70999-5. Epub 2015 Feb 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Vaccinating the world against COVID-19 is a no-brainer.让全世界接种新冠疫苗是一件轻而易举的事。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 May 2;2(5):e0000427. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000427. eCollection 2022.
2
Equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines makes a life-saving difference to all countries.公平获取 COVID-19 疫苗对所有国家都有着生死攸关的意义。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Feb;6(2):207-216. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01289-8. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
3
COVAX can still end COVID-19 vaccine apartheid.新冠疫苗全球获取机制仍可终结新冠疫苗分配不公的现象。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Feb;6(2):175. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01308-8.
4
Vaccine inequity is unethical.疫苗分配不公是不道德的。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Feb;6(2):168-169. doi: 10.1038/s41562-022-01295-w.
5
A Call to Action: Reinvigorating Interest and Investments in Health Infrastructure.呼吁行动:重振对卫生基础设施的兴趣和投资。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2021 Dec 21;9(4):711-715. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-21-00674. Print 2021 Dec 31.
6
Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine up to 6 months in a large integrated health system in the USA: a retrospective cohort study.辉瑞-BioNTech 信使核糖核酸 COVID-19 疫苗在美国大型综合卫生系统中的 6 个月有效性:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2021 Oct 16;398(10309):1407-1416. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02183-8. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
7
Waning Immune Humoral Response to BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine over 6 Months.辉瑞-BioNTech 新冠疫苗接种 6 个月后免疫体液反应逐渐减弱。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Dec 9;385(24):e84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2114583. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
8
National interest may require distributing COVID-19 vaccines to other countries.国家利益可能需要向其他国家分发 COVID-19 疫苗。
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 14;11(1):18253. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97544-5.
9
Dynamics of antibody response to BNT162b2 vaccine after six months: a longitudinal prospective study.BNT162b2疫苗接种六个月后抗体反应的动态变化:一项纵向前瞻性研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2021 Nov;10:100208. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100208. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
10
Optimal COVID-19 Vaccine Sharing Between Two Nations That Also Have Extensive Travel Exchanges.两国之间的 COVID-19 疫苗最佳共享,这两个国家也有广泛的旅行交流。
Front Public Health. 2021 Aug 12;9:633144. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.633144. eCollection 2021.

出于自私目的的疫苗储备共享。

Vaccine stockpile sharing for selfish objectives.

作者信息

Shivam Shashwat, Weitz Joshua S, Wardi Yorai

机构信息

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLOS Glob Public Health. 2022 Dec 5;2(12):e0001312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001312. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgph.0001312
PMID:36962897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10021782/
Abstract

The COVAX program aims to provide global equitable access to life-saving vaccines. Despite calls for increased sharing, vaccine protectionism has limited progress towards vaccine sharing goals. For example, as of April 2022 only ~20% of the population in Africa had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose. Here we use a two-nation coupled epidemic model to evaluate optimal vaccine-sharing policies given a selfish objective: in which countries with vaccine stockpiles aim to minimize fatalities in their own population. Computational analysis of a suite of simulated epidemics reveal that it is often optimal for a donor country to share a significant fraction of its vaccine stockpile with a recipient country that has no vaccine stockpile. Sharing a vaccine stockpile reduces the intensity of outbreaks in the recipient, in turn reducing travel-associated incidence in the donor. This effect is intensified as vaccination rates in a donor country decrease and epidemic coupling between countries increases. Critically, vaccine sharing by a donor significantly reduces transmission and fatalities in the recipient. Moreover, the same computational framework reveals the potential use of hybrid sharing policies that have a negligible effect on fatalities in the donor compared to the optimal policy while significantly reducing fatalities in the recipient. Altogether, these findings provide a self-interested rationale for countries to consider sharing part of their vaccine stockpiles.

摘要

新冠肺炎疫苗实施计划(COVAX)旨在实现全球公平获取救命疫苗。尽管呼吁加强疫苗共享,但疫苗保护主义阻碍了在实现疫苗共享目标方面取得进展。例如,截至2022年4月,非洲只有约20%的人口接种了至少一剂新冠疫苗。在此,我们使用两国耦合疫情模型来评估在自私目标下的最优疫苗共享政策:即有疫苗储备的国家旨在尽量减少本国人口中的死亡人数。对一系列模拟疫情的计算分析表明,对于一个捐助国来说,通常最优的做法是与没有疫苗储备的受援国分享其很大一部分疫苗储备。分享疫苗储备会降低受援国疫情爆发的强度,进而减少与旅行相关的捐助国发病率。随着捐助国疫苗接种率下降以及国家间疫情耦合增加,这种效应会增强。至关重要的是,捐助国分享疫苗会显著降低受援国的传播率和死亡率。此外,同样的计算框架揭示了混合共享政策的潜在用途,与最优政策相比,这些政策对捐助国的死亡率影响可忽略不计,同时能显著降低受援国的死亡率。总之,这些发现为各国考虑分享部分疫苗储备提供了一个出于自身利益的理由。