• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射程序的正当化:两名放射技师在两家公立医院的经验。

Justification of radiological procedures: Radiographers' experiences at two public hospitals.

机构信息

University of Namibia, Faculty of Health Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, School of Allied Health Sciences, Department of Radiography, Windhoek, Namibia.

University of Namibia, Faculty of Health Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, School of Allied Health Sciences, Department of Radiography, Windhoek, Namibia.

出版信息

J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2023 Jun;54(2):312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.02.011. Epub 2023 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.jmir.2023.02.011
PMID:36964063
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Justification is a process conducted by the radiographer in consultation with the radiologist to evaluate radiological procedures ordered by doctors. The main purpose for justifying all radiologic procedures is to assess the benefits and risks of a requested radiographic procedure and determine whether exposure will continue. Furthermore, justification helps to prevent unnecessary radiation exposure and reduce the chances of harmful effects of ionizing radiation.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to explore the experiences of radiographers regarding the justification of radiological procedures at two public hospitals in Namibia METHODS: This study made use of a qualitative, exploratory design. A total number of 13 purposefully selected radiographers from radiology departments in two tertiary public - hospitals in Namibia were interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide and audio recorder. All interviews were conducted face-to-face until data saturation was achieved. Data were analysed using Atlas.ti Windows (version 9.0 using Tesch's 8-step method of qualitative data analysis to generate themes and subthemes.

FINDINGS

The participants experienced an enhancement of patient care through enhanced radiation protection and optimised patient care. They also experienced defunct communication systems through deficient communication between radiographers and referrers, professional role conflict and incomplete referrals.

CONCLUSION

The study revealed that the justification of radiological procedures was linked to both negative and positive experiences. Enhanced patient-centred care was a positive experience related to the radiographers' job responsibilities. The defunct communication support system was a negative experience as it related to the limited availability and utilisation of communication systems that are meant to enhance and support justification by radiographers. The study recommends an in-depth study to quantify unjustified procedures in these two hospital departments. Continuous professional development focusing on justification and referral protocols must be conducted jointly between radiographers and referrers to create awareness and a platform for shared decision-making models.

摘要

背景

正当化是放射技师与放射科医生协商进行的过程,用于评估医生开具的放射程序。正当化所有放射程序的主要目的是评估请求的放射程序的益处和风险,并确定是否继续进行照射。此外,正当化有助于防止不必要的辐射暴露,并降低电离辐射有害影响的可能性。

目的

本研究旨在探讨纳米比亚两家公立医院的放射技师对放射程序正当化的经验。

方法

本研究采用定性、探索性设计。从纳米比亚两家三级公立医院放射科部门中,通过目的性抽样选择了 13 名放射技师进行半结构化访谈,并使用音频记录器。所有访谈均面对面进行,直到达到数据饱和。使用 Atlas.ti Windows(版本 9.0)采用 Tesch 的 8 步定性数据分析方法对数据进行分析,以生成主题和子主题。

结果

参与者通过增强辐射防护和优化患者护理体验到患者护理的提升。他们还经历了因放射技师和转诊医生之间沟通系统失效、专业角色冲突和转诊不完整而导致的沟通失效。

结论

研究表明,放射程序的正当化与积极和消极的经验都有关联。增强以患者为中心的护理是与放射技师工作职责相关的积极经验。失效的沟通支持系统是一种消极经验,因为它与旨在增强和支持放射技师正当化的沟通系统的有限可用性和利用有关。本研究建议对这两家医院科室中未经正当化的程序进行深入研究。必须由放射技师和转诊医生共同开展关于正当化和转诊协议的持续专业发展,以提高认识并为共同决策模型搭建平台。

相似文献

1
Justification of radiological procedures: Radiographers' experiences at two public hospitals.放射程序的正当化:两名放射技师在两家公立医院的经验。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2023 Jun;54(2):312-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.02.011. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
2
Radiation risk-benefit communication during paediatric CT imaging: Experiences of radiographers at two public hospitals.儿科CT成像中的辐射风险效益沟通:两家公立医院放射技师的经验
Radiography (Lond). 2023 Mar;29(2):301-306. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
Workplace factors facilitating the radiographers' assessment of referrals for diagnostic imaging - A qualitative study.促进放射技师对诊断成像转诊评估的工作场所因素——一项定性研究。
Radiography (Lond). 2022 Feb;28(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
Radiographers' actions and challenges when confronted with inappropriate radiology referrals.放射技师在面对不适当的放射科转诊时的行为和挑战。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jun;32(6):4210-4217. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08470-z. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
5
The radiographers' opinion on assessing radiological referrals.放射技师对放射学转诊评估的意见。
Radiography (Lond). 2024 Mar;30(2):605-611. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.01.016. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
6
Radiographers' role in justification of medical imaging examinations.放射技师在医学影像检查正当性判断中的作用。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2024 Mar;55(1):74-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2023.12.007. Epub 2024 Jan 14.
7
South African radiographers' radiation protection practices, a qualitative study.南非放射技师的辐射防护实践:一项定性研究。
Radiography (Lond). 2022 May;28(2):387-393. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2021.12.008. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
8
Radiographers' perceptions of their professional rights in diagnostic radiography: a qualitative interview study.放射技师对其在诊断放射学中专业权利的认知:一项定性访谈研究。
Scand J Caring Sci. 2017 Mar;31(1):139-145. doi: 10.1111/scs.12335. Epub 2016 May 10.
9
Communicating Radiation Risk to Patients: Experiences Among Radiographers in Norway.向患者传达辐射风险:挪威放射技师的经验。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020 Dec;51(4S):S84-S89. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.06.011. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
10
Preparedness to assume professional roles: experiences of recently qualified radiographers: A qualitative study.准备承担专业角色:最近合格的放射技师的经验:一项定性研究。
J Med Radiat Sci. 2023 Sep;70(3):262-269. doi: 10.1002/jmrs.690. Epub 2023 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Collaborating with non-radiological clinical colleagues.与非放射科临床同事合作。
Pediatr Radiol. 2025 Mar;55(3):397-410. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06027-y. Epub 2024 Aug 22.