Suppr超能文献

上肢周围神经正常弥散张量成像值的荟萃分析。

Meta-analysis of the normal diffusion tensor imaging values of the peripheral nerves in the upper limb.

机构信息

Leeds Institute for Medical Research, The Advanced Imaging Centre, Leeds General Infirmary, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS1 3EX, UK.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Leeds Teaching Hospitals Trust, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 24;13(1):4852. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-31307-2.

Abstract

Peripheral neuropathy affects 1 in 10 adults over the age of 40 years. Given the absence of a reliable diagnostic test for peripheral neuropathy, there has been a surge of research into diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) because it characterises nerve microstructure and provides reproducible proxy measures of myelination, axon diameter, fibre density and organisation. Before researchers and clinicians can reliably use diffusion tensor imaging to assess the 'health' of the major nerves of the upper limb, we must understand the "normal" range of values and how they vary with experimental conditions. We searched PubMed, Embase, medRxiv and bioRxiv for studies which reported the findings of DTI of the upper limb in healthy adults. Four review authors independently triple extracted data. Using the meta suite of Stata 17, we estimated the normal fractional anisotropy (FA) and diffusivity (mean, MD; radial, RD; axial AD) values of the median, radial and ulnar nerve in the arm, elbow and forearm. Using meta-regression, we explored how DTI metrics varied with age and experimental conditions. We included 20 studies reporting data from 391 limbs, belonging to 346 adults (189 males and 154 females, ~ 1.2 M:1F) of mean age 34 years (median 31, range 20-80). In the arm, there was no difference in the FA (pooled mean 0.59 mm/s [95% CI 0.57, 0.62]; I 98%) or MD (pooled mean 1.13 × 10 mm/s [95% CI 1.08, 1.18]; I 99%) of the median, radial and ulnar nerves. Around the elbow, the ulnar nerve had a 12% lower FA than the median and radial nerves (95% CI - 0.25, 0.00) and significantly higher MD, RD and AD. In the forearm, the FA (pooled mean 0.55 [95% CI 0.59, 0.64]; I 96%) and MD (pooled mean 1.03 × 10 mm/s [95% CI 0.94, 1.12]; I 99%) of the three nerves were similar. Multivariable meta regression showed that the b-value, TE, TR, spatial resolution and age of the subject were clinically important moderators of DTI parameters in peripheral nerves. We show that subject age, as well as the b-value, TE, TR and spatial resolution are important moderators of DTI metrics from healthy nerves in the adult upper limb. The normal ranges shown here may inform future clinical and research studies.

摘要

周围神经病变影响超过 40 岁的成年人的十分之一。由于缺乏可靠的周围神经病变诊断测试,因此研究人员一直在研究扩散张量成像 (DTI),因为它可以描述神经的微观结构,并提供髓鞘、轴突直径、纤维密度和组织的可重复的替代测量。在研究人员和临床医生能够可靠地使用扩散张量成像来评估上肢主要神经的“健康”状况之前,我们必须了解“正常”范围以及它们如何随实验条件而变化。我们在 PubMed、Embase、medRxiv 和 bioRxiv 上搜索了报告健康成年人上肢 DTI 结果的研究。四位综述作者独立地三重提取数据。我们使用 Stata 17 中的 meta 套件估计了手臂、肘部和前臂正中神经、桡神经和尺神经的正常分数各向异性 (FA) 和扩散率 (平均、MD;径向、RD;轴向 AD) 值。我们使用元回归探讨了 DTI 指标如何随年龄和实验条件而变化。我们纳入了 20 项研究,这些研究报告了来自 391 条肢体的数据,属于 346 名成年人(189 名男性和 154 名女性,~1.2:1),平均年龄 34 岁(中位数 31 岁,范围 20-80 岁)。在手臂中,正中神经、桡神经和尺神经的 FA(平均 0.59 毫米/秒 [95% CI 0.57, 0.62];I 98%)或 MD(平均 1.13×10 毫米/秒 [95% CI 1.08, 1.18];I 99%)没有差异。在肘部周围,尺神经的 FA 比正中神经和桡神经低 12%(95% CI -0.25, 0.00),MD、RD 和 AD 明显更高。在前臂中,三根神经的 FA(平均 0.55 [95% CI 0.59, 0.64];I 96%)和 MD(平均 1.03×10 毫米/秒 [95% CI 0.94, 1.12];I 99%)相似。多变量元回归显示,b 值、TE、TR、空间分辨率和受试者年龄是周围神经 DTI 参数的重要临床调节因素。我们表明,受试者年龄以及 b 值、TE、TR 和空间分辨率是成年上肢健康神经的 DTI 指标的重要调节因素。这里显示的正常范围可能会为未来的临床和研究提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d20/10039047/fe4b25f818d7/41598_2023_31307_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验