文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis.

作者信息

Haddaway Neal R, Page Matthew J, Pritchard Chris C, McGuinness Luke A

机构信息

Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF) Müncheberg Germany.

Africa Centre for Evidence University of Johannesburg Johannesburg South Africa.

出版信息

Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 27;18(2):e1230. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1230. eCollection 2022 Jun.


DOI:10.1002/cl2.1230
PMID:36911350
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8958186/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reporting standards, such as PRISMA aim to ensure that the methods and results of systematic reviews are described in sufficient detail to allow full transparency. Flow diagrams in evidence syntheses allow the reader to rapidly understand the core procedures used in a review and examine the attrition of irrelevant records throughout the review process. Recent research suggests that use of flow diagrams in systematic reviews is poor and of low quality and called for standardised templates to facilitate better reporting in flow diagrams. The increasing options for interactivity provided by the Internet gives us an opportunity to support easy-to-use evidence synthesis tools, and here we report on the development of a tool for the production of PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review flow diagrams. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We developed a free-to-use, Open Source R package and web-based Shiny app to allow users to design PRISMA flow diagrams for their own systematic reviews. Our tool allows users to produce standardised visualisations that transparently document the methods and results of a systematic review process in a variety of formats. In addition, we provide the opportunity to produce interactive, web-based flow diagrams (exported as HTML files), that allow readers to click on boxes of the diagram and navigate to further details on methods, results or data files. We provide an interactive example here; https://prisma-flowdiagram.github.io/. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a user-friendly tool for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams for users with coding experience and, importantly, for users without prior experience in coding by making use of Shiny (https://estech.shinyapps.io/prisma_flowdiagram/). This free-to-use tool will make it easier to produce clear and PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review flow diagrams. Significantly, users can also produce interactive flow diagrams for the first time, allowing readers of their reviews to smoothly and swiftly explore and navigate to further details of the methods and results of a review. We believe this tool will increase use of PRISMA flow diagrams, improve the compliance and quality of flow diagrams, and facilitate strong science communication of the methods and results of systematic reviews by making use of interactivity. We encourage the systematic review community to make use of the tool, and provide feedback to streamline and improve their usability and efficiency.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b5/8958186/165800d7615b/CL2-18-e1230-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b5/8958186/046f0b79a0bc/CL2-18-e1230-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b5/8958186/9fea05716604/CL2-18-e1230-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b5/8958186/f00649e229f2/CL2-18-e1230-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b5/8958186/165800d7615b/CL2-18-e1230-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b5/8958186/046f0b79a0bc/CL2-18-e1230-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b5/8958186/9fea05716604/CL2-18-e1230-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b5/8958186/f00649e229f2/CL2-18-e1230-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9b5/8958186/165800d7615b/CL2-18-e1230-g004.jpg

相似文献

[1]
: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis.

Campbell Syst Rev. 2022-3-27

[2]
I-REFF diagrams: enhancing transparency in systematic review through interactive reference flow diagrams.

Syst Rev. 2024-1-17

[3]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[4]
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.

Early Hum Dev. 2020-11

[5]
Development of an interactive web-based tool to conduct and interrogate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: MetaDTA.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019-4-18

[6]
Do evidence summaries increase health policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review.

Campbell Syst Rev. 2018-9-10

[7]
Tailored PRISMA 2020 flow diagrams for living systematic reviews: a methodological survey and a proposal.

F1000Res. 2021

[8]
Quality of flow diagram in systematic review and/or meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2018-6-27

[9]
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024-7-9

[10]
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

Qual Life Res. 2024-8

引用本文的文献

[1]
Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and chronic kidney disease: a comprehensive meta-analysis.

Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025-7-23

[2]
Application of head-mounted display-based augmented and mixed reality in nursing education: a scoping review.

BMC Nurs. 2025-9-2

[3]
Clinical outcomes and complications in Latarjet versus free bone block procedures for anterior shoulder instability: a meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025-8-31

[4]
Efficacy of a single intra-articular injection of mesenchymal stem cells for knee osteoarthritis: a dose-focused meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025-8-30

[5]
A Systematic Review of the Relation between Complementary Feeding and Children's Development.

Curr Nutr Rep. 2025-8-30

[6]
Glycopeptide Heteroresistance Among Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2025-8-14

[7]
Differentiating Visual Symptoms in Retinal Migraine and Migraine With Aura: A Systematic Review of Shared Features, Distinctions, and Clinical Implications.

Cureus. 2025-8-26

[8]
An Update on Viral Conjunctivitis Treatment Strategies: A Narrative Literature Review.

Microorganisms. 2025-7-22

[9]
Discovery of Gingipains and Inhibitors from Food-Derived Natural Products: A Narrative Review.

Foods. 2025-8-19

[10]
Depression in Romanian Medical Students-A Study, Systematic Review, and Meta-Analysis.

J Clin Med. 2025-8-19

本文引用的文献

[1]
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

BMJ. 2021-3-29

[2]
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019-10-3

[3]
Quality of flow diagram in systematic review and/or meta-analysis.

PLoS One. 2018-6-27

[4]
Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017-9-11

[5]
Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews of Biomedical Research: A Cross-Sectional Study.

PLoS Med. 2016-5-24

[6]
Study flow diagrams in Cochrane systematic review updates: an adapted PRISMA flow diagram.

Syst Rev. 2014-5-29

[7]
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

PLoS Med. 2009-7-21

[8]
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

PLoS Med. 2009-7-21

[9]
Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews.

PLoS Med. 2007-3-27

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索