• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

石生苔藓植物对喀斯特高钙环境的形态和生理适应特征。

Morphological and physiological adaptation characteristics of lithophytic bryophytes to karst high calcium environment.

机构信息

Guizhou Botanical Garden, Guiyang, 550001, China.

Guizhou Academy of Forestry Sciences, Guiyang, 550005, China.

出版信息

BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Mar 25;23(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03980-4.

DOI:10.1186/s12870-022-03980-4
PMID:36964495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10039556/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lithophytic bryophytes grow on the rock surface, change the habitat on the rock surface through biological karstification, and provide a material basis for the growth of other plants. However, the surface calcium content of bare rock is high. The lithophytic bryophytes may have a special mechanism to adapt to the karst high calcium environment. The present study aimed to explore the physiological regulation process of karst lithophytic bryophytes under high calcium environment, and to provide scientific basis for revealing the maintenance mechanism of karst biodiversity.

RESULTS

With the increase of Ca concentration, the contents of Pro, SP and MDA of lithophytic bryophytes showed a downward-upward-downward trend. However, when Ca ≥ 400 mmol/L, the contents of Pro and SP changed significantly at 1d, 2d, 3d, 5d and 7d with the extension of culture time, and lithophytic bryophytes died after 2 months of culture. Under different Ca concentrations, the maximum SOD activity of lithophytic bryophytes is 1758.00 (U/g FW), the minimum is 92.60 (U/g FW), the maximum POD activity is 120.88 (U/g FW), and the minimum is 4.80 (U/g FW). The antioxidative activity of of Hyophila involuta are higher than that of Didymodon constrictus and Eurohypnum leptothallum, and its enzyme activity changed significantly with the increase of calcium concentration and time.At the same time, the contents of TChl, Chla, and Chlb in lithophytic bryophytes decreased with the increase of Ca concentration. When Ca = 400 mmol/L, the contents of TChl and Chla were the lowest, but when Ca > 400 mmol/L, they began to increase. In addition, ABA is negatively correlated with TChl and Chla, and positively correlated with ROS. It shows that ABA has a certain role in regulating the adaptation of lithophytic bryophytes to high calcium environment.

CONCLUSIONS

Lithophytic bryophytes have strong calcium tolerance, and their physiological response to high calcium stress is different from vascular bundle plants. The general stress principle is not applicable to lithophytic bryophytes. The response of lithophytic bryophytes to the change of Caconcentration is slow, showing passive response or inert response.

摘要

背景

石生植物生长在岩石表面,通过生物岩溶作用改变岩石表面的生境,为其他植物的生长提供物质基础。但是,裸岩表面的钙含量较高。石生植物可能具有一种特殊的机制来适应岩溶高钙环境。本研究旨在探讨高钙环境下石生苔藓植物的生理调节过程,为揭示岩溶生物多样性维持机制提供科学依据。

结果

随着 Ca 浓度的增加,石生苔藓植物 Pro、SP 和 MDA 的含量呈先下降后上升再下降的趋势。然而,当 Ca≥400mmol/L 时,培养时间延长至 1d、2d、3d、5d 和 7d 时,Pro 和 SP 的含量变化明显,培养 2 个月后苔藓植物死亡。在不同 Ca 浓度下,石生苔藓植物的最大 SOD 活性为 1758.00(U/g FW),最小为 92.60(U/g FW),最大 POD 活性为 120.88(U/g FW),最小为 4.80(U/g FW)。厚叶拟鳞叶苔的抗氧化活性高于粗叶短月藓和东亚砂藓,其酶活性随 Ca 浓度和时间的增加而显著变化。同时,石生苔藓植物的总叶绿素(TChl)、叶绿素 a(Chla)和叶绿素 b(Chlb)含量随 Ca 浓度的增加而降低。当 Ca=400mmol/L 时,TChl 和 Chla 的含量最低,但当 Ca>400mmol/L 时,它们开始增加。此外,ABA 与 TChl 和 Chla 呈负相关,与 ROS 呈正相关。这表明 ABA 在调节石生苔藓植物对高钙环境的适应中具有一定的作用。

结论

石生苔藓植物具有较强的耐钙能力,其对高钙胁迫的生理响应不同于维管束植物。一般的胁迫原则不适用于石生苔藓植物。石生苔藓植物对 Ca 浓度变化的反应较慢,表现为被动反应或惰性反应。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/c470b59c8016/12870_2022_3980_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/1da1feb303bf/12870_2022_3980_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/3636e40b2e50/12870_2022_3980_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/1c37949caada/12870_2022_3980_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/368669c45c39/12870_2022_3980_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/0876161134c3/12870_2022_3980_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/65e8d1644b00/12870_2022_3980_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/117d7bbb1c36/12870_2022_3980_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/128c4e052d21/12870_2022_3980_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/656aa7f6b4fc/12870_2022_3980_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/c139565ba3d9/12870_2022_3980_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/597e811aa1d7/12870_2022_3980_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/c470b59c8016/12870_2022_3980_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/1da1feb303bf/12870_2022_3980_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/3636e40b2e50/12870_2022_3980_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/1c37949caada/12870_2022_3980_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/368669c45c39/12870_2022_3980_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/0876161134c3/12870_2022_3980_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/65e8d1644b00/12870_2022_3980_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/117d7bbb1c36/12870_2022_3980_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/128c4e052d21/12870_2022_3980_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/656aa7f6b4fc/12870_2022_3980_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/c139565ba3d9/12870_2022_3980_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/597e811aa1d7/12870_2022_3980_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78ec/10039556/c470b59c8016/12870_2022_3980_Fig12_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Morphological and physiological adaptation characteristics of lithophytic bryophytes to karst high calcium environment.石生苔藓植物对喀斯特高钙环境的形态和生理适应特征。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Mar 25;23(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03980-4.
2
Diversity of lithophytic moss species in karst regions in response to elevation gradients.石生苔藓物种多样性对喀斯特地区海拔梯度的响应。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 30;18(6):e0286722. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286722. eCollection 2023.
3
Bryophytes and the symbiotic microorganisms, the pioneers of vegetation restoration in karst rocky desertification areas in southwestern China.苔藓植物与共生微生物:中国西南喀斯特石漠化地区植被恢复的先驱。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020 Jan;104(2):873-891. doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-10235-0. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
4
[Effects of gap and growth substrate on nitrogen and phosphorus contents of bryophytes in an alpine forest].[林隙与生长基质对高寒森林苔藓植物氮、磷含量的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Apr;29(4):1133-1139. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201804.003.
5
Rare microbial taxa as the major drivers of nutrient acquisition under moss biocrusts in karst area.稀有微生物类群是喀斯特地区苔藓生物结皮养分获取的主要驱动因素。
Front Microbiol. 2024 May 1;15:1384367. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1384367. eCollection 2024.
6
The bryophyte community as bioindicator of heavy metals in a waterfall outflow.苔藓植物群落作为瀑布出水口重金属的生物指示剂。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 28;12(1):6942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10980-9.
7
ABA in bryophytes: how a universal growth regulator in life became a plant hormone?苔藓植物中的 ABA:普遍生长调节剂如何成为植物激素?
J Plant Res. 2011 Jul;124(4):437-53. doi: 10.1007/s10265-011-0410-5. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
8
Study on interspecific relationships, community stability, and environmental factors of lithophytic moss at different elevations in karst cities.喀斯特城市不同海拔石生苔藓的种间关系、群落稳定性及环境因子研究
Ecol Evol. 2024 Aug 6;14(8):e70120. doi: 10.1002/ece3.70120. eCollection 2024 Aug.
9
Callose Detection and Quantification at Plasmodesmata in Bryophytes.在苔藓植物中检测和量化质膜通道中的胼胝质。
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2457:177-187. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2132-5_11.
10
Could the canopy structure of bryophytes serve as an indicator of microbial biodiversity? A test for testate amoebae and microcrustaceans from a subtropical cloud forest in Dominican Republic.苔藓植物的冠层结构可以作为微生物生物多样性的指标吗?来自多米尼加共和国亚热带云雾林的有壳变形虫和微型甲壳类动物的检验。
Microb Ecol. 2012 Jul;64(1):200-13. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-0004-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Genome-Wide Characterization of the Gene Family in Bunting and the Role of CsANN1 in Dehydrocavidine Biosynthesis.鹀属中该基因家族的全基因组特征及 CsANN1 在脱氢卡维丁生物合成中的作用
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jun 27;14(13):1974. doi: 10.3390/plants14131974.
2
Effects of exogenous calcium on seed germination and physiological traits of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) seedlings.外源钙对紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)种子萌发及幼苗生理特性的影响
BMC Plant Biol. 2025 Mar 11;25(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12870-025-06334-y.
3
Genome-Wide Identification and Characterization of the Family of Genes and Their Response to High-Calcium Stress in .

本文引用的文献

1
When time is not of the essence: constraints to the carbon balance of bryophytes.当时间不再紧迫时:苔藓植物碳平衡的限制因素。
J Exp Bot. 2022 Jul 16;73(13):4562-4575. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac104.
2
GhWRKY1-like, a WRKY transcription factor, mediates drought tolerance in Arabidopsis via modulating ABA biosynthesis.GhWRKY1-like,一种 WRKY 转录因子,通过调节 ABA 生物合成介导拟南芥的耐旱性。
BMC Plant Biol. 2021 Oct 8;21(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03238-5.
3
The hornworts: morphology, evolution and development.角苔纲:形态学、进化与发育
全基因组范围内对该基因家族的鉴定与特征分析及其对高钙胁迫的响应 。 (原文中“. ”处信息缺失,翻译可能不太完整准确)
Genes (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;16(1):109. doi: 10.3390/genes16010109.
New Phytol. 2021 Jan;229(2):735-754. doi: 10.1111/nph.16874. Epub 2020 Sep 15.
4
A combination of morphological and photosynthetic functional traits maintains the vertical distribution of bryophytes in a subtropical cloud forest.形态和光合功能特征的结合维持了亚热带云雾林苔藓植物的垂直分布。
Am J Bot. 2020 May;107(5):761-772. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1474.
5
Comprehensive study of the genes involved in chlorophyll synthesis and degradation pathways in some monocot and dicot plant species.对一些单子叶和双子叶植物物种中涉及叶绿素合成和降解途径的基因进行综合研究。
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2021 Apr;39(7):2387-2414. doi: 10.1080/07391102.2020.1748717. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
6
Anatomical constraints to nonstomatal diffusion conductance and photosynthesis in lycophytes and bryophytes.维管植物和苔藓植物中非气孔扩散导度和光合作用的解剖限制。
New Phytol. 2019 May;222(3):1256-1270. doi: 10.1111/nph.15675. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
7
Comparisons of photosynthesis-related traits of 27 abundant or subordinate bryophyte species in a subalpine old-growth fir forest.亚高山老龄冷杉林中27种优势或从属苔藓植物光合相关性状的比较
Ecol Evol. 2017 Aug 11;7(18):7454-7461. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3277. eCollection 2017 Sep.
8
The 'plant economic spectrum' in bryophytes, a comparative study in subalpine forest.苔藓植物的“植物经济谱”:亚高山森林中的一项比较研究
Am J Bot. 2017 Feb;104(2):261-270. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1600335. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
9
Higher photosynthetic capacity and different functional trait scaling relationships in erect bryophytes compared with prostrate species.与匍匐苔藓植物相比,直立苔藓植物具有更高的光合能力和不同的功能性状缩放关系。
Oecologia. 2016 Feb;180(2):359-69. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3484-2. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
10
Are bryophytes shade plants? Photosynthetic light responses and proportions of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total carotenoids.苔藓植物是喜阴植物吗?光合光响应以及叶绿素a、叶绿素b和总类胡萝卜素的比例。
Ann Bot. 2004 Oct;94(4):593-603. doi: 10.1093/aob/mch178. Epub 2004 Aug 19.