Zhang Zhijing, Shao Shuai, Liu Xuefeng, Tong Zhaohui
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Beijing Institute of Respiratory Medicine and Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Departments of Pathology, Urology, Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Med Virol. 2023 Apr;95(4):e28702. doi: 10.1002/jmv.28702.
The objective of this study was to assess whether mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy could offer survival advantages for patients with novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). An electronic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, WanFang, and CNKI was performed from December 1, 2019 to December 25, 2022. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted in this meta analysis. Besides, subgroup analysis and meta-regression was performed using a random-effects model to find the potential sources of heterogeneity. Seventeen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1073 patients with COVID-19 were included in this study. Compared with the control group, patients in the MSCs groups were associated with significantly reduced all-cause mortality (MSCs 18.4% vs. control 25.5%; risk ratio [RR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.90; p = 0.004; I² = 0%). For all secondary outcomes, there wasn't significant improvement in the experimental group versus the control group regarding symptom remission rate (53.2%, 201/378 vs. 46.5%, 164/353; RR 1.15; 95% CI 1.00-1.32; p = 0.05; I² = 43%), but the pooled analysis revealed significant differences between the groups in length of hospital stay (MD: -3.82, 95% CI: -5.87 to -1.77; p = 0.0003, I2 = 0%), requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation (RR 0.52; 95% CI 0.33-0.82; p = 0.005; I = 0%) and post-CRP level (MD: -31.61; 95% CI -46.74 to -16.49; p < 0.0001). Moreover, regarding the incidence of adverse events (AEs) (RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.35-1.52; p = 0.39; I² = 44%) and serious adverse events (sAEs) (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.40-1.92; p = 0.73; I² = 39%), no significant differences were observed between MSCs and control groups. The TSA analysis showed that the result of all-cause mortality might be false-positive result. Based on the pooled results in this study, compared with standard treatment, MSCs therapy may reduce all-cause mortality of patients with COVID-19 with no increase risk of AEs and sAEs, but may not improve symptom remission rate. Further more high-quality and large-sample RCTs should be performed to confirm these findings.
本研究的目的是评估间充质干细胞(MSCs)疗法是否能为2019年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者带来生存优势。于2019年12月1日至2022年12月25日对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science、万方和知网进行了电子检索。主要结局是全因死亡率。在本荟萃分析中进行了试验序贯分析(TSA)。此外,使用随机效应模型进行亚组分析和meta回归以寻找异质性的潜在来源。本研究纳入了17项随机对照试验(RCT),共涉及1073例COVID-19患者。与对照组相比,MSCs组患者的全因死亡率显著降低(MSCs组为18.4%,对照组为25.5%;风险比[RR]0.73;95%置信区间[CI]0.59 - 0.90;p = 0.00(4);I² = 0%)。对于所有次要结局,实验组与对照组在症状缓解率方面无显著改善(53.2%,201/378 vs. 46.5%,164/353;RR 1.15;95% CI 1.00 - 1.32;p = 0.05;I² = (43)%),但汇总分析显示两组在住院时间(MD: - 3.82,95% CI: - 5.87至 - 1.77;p = 0.000(3),I² = 0%)、有创机械通气需求(RR 0.52;95% CI 0.33 - 0.82;p = 0.00(5);I² = 0%)和CRP水平(MD: - 31.61;95% CI - 46.74至 - 16.49;p < 0.000(1))方面存在显著差异。此外,关于不良事件(AE)发生率(RR 0.73;95% CI 0.35 - 1.52;p = 0.39;I² = (44)%)和严重不良事件(sAE)发生率(RR 0.87;95% CI 0.40 - 1.92;p = 0.73;I² = (39)%),MSCs组与对照组之间未观察到显著差异。TSA分析表明全因死亡率的结果可能是假阳性结果。基于本研究的汇总结果,与标准治疗相比,MSCs疗法可能降低COVID-患者的全因死亡率,且不增加AE和sAE的风险,但可能无法提高症状缓解率。此外,应进行更多高质量、大样本的RCT来证实这些发现。