Sahib A, Chen J, Cárdenas D, Calear A L
School of Medicine and Psychology, The Australian National University, Building 39, Science Rd, Action ACT 2601, Australia.
Department of Psychology, University of Montreal, Pavillon Marie-Victorin, 90 avenue Vincent d'Indy, Montréal (QC) H2V 2S9, Canada.
Clin Psychol Rev. 2023 Apr;101:102270. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2023.102270. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
Intolerance of uncertainty, a transdiagnostic factor manifested across emotional disorders, has been associated with difficulties in regulating emotions. This meta-analysis addresses the lack of synthesis of this relationship. PsycInfo, PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest were systematically searched for relevant articles published up to and during November 2022. We combined 161 effect sizes from 91 studies (N = 30,239), separating the analysis into maladaptive and adaptive emotion regulation strategies and their association with intolerance of uncertainty. We found a moderate positive relationship between maladaptive, and a moderate inverse relationship between adaptive emotion regulation and intolerance of uncertainty. Analysing the magnitude of relationships revealed that cognitive avoidance and mindfulness were the maladaptive and adaptive strategies respectively which had the largest effect sizes and thus strongest relationships with intolerance of uncertainty. Combining all strategies, cognitive avoidance remained the largest effect size, while expressive suppression had the smallest effect size and was non-significant in its relationship. Further analyses testing study sample, design, and age as moderators found no significant moderator for the relationships between intolerance of uncertainty and emotion regulation strategies. These findings have implications for future intolerance of uncertainty interventions, with emotion regulation as a potential target of change.
对不确定性的不耐受是一种在情绪障碍中普遍存在的跨诊断因素,与情绪调节困难有关。这项荟萃分析解决了对这种关系缺乏综合研究的问题。我们系统检索了PsycInfo、PubMed、Scopus和ProQuest数据库,查找截至2022年11月及该月期间发表的相关文章。我们合并了91项研究(N = 30,239)中的161个效应量,将分析分为适应不良和适应性情绪调节策略及其与对不确定性的不耐受之间的关联。我们发现适应不良的情绪调节与对不确定性的不耐受之间存在中等程度的正相关,而适应性情绪调节与对不确定性的不耐受之间存在中等程度的负相关。对关系强度的分析表明,认知回避和正念分别是与对不确定性的不耐受具有最大效应量且因此具有最强关系的适应不良和适应性策略。综合所有策略来看,认知回避的效应量仍然最大,而表达抑制的效应量最小且其关系不显著。进一步将研究样本、设计和年龄作为调节变量进行分析,发现对不确定性的不耐受与情绪调节策略之间的关系不存在显著的调节变量。这些发现对未来针对对不确定性的不耐受的干预措施具有启示意义,情绪调节可作为一个潜在的改变目标。